{"title":"二进制值原理的力量","authors":"Yaroslav Alekseev, E. Hirsch","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2210.17429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The (extended) Binary Value Principle (eBVP: $\\sum_{i=1}^n x_i2^{i-1} = -k$ for $k>0$ and $x^2_i=x_i$) has received a lot of attention recently, several lower bounds have been proved for it (Alekseev et al 2020, Alekseev 2021, Part and Tzameret 2021). Also it has been shown (Alekseev et al 2020) that the probabilistically verifiable Ideal Proof System (IPS) (Grochow and Pitassi 2018) together with eBVP polynomially simulates a similar semialgebraic proof system. In this paper we consider Polynomial Calculus with the algebraic version of Tseitin's extension rule (Ext-PC). Contrary to IPS, this is a Cook--Reckhow proof system. We show that in this context eBVP still allows to simulate similar semialgebraic systems. We also prove that it allows to simulate the Square Root Rule (Grigoriev and Hirsch 2003), which is in sharp contrast with the result of (Alekseev 2021) that shows an exponential lower bound on the size of Ext-PC derivations of the Binary Value Principle from its square. On the other hand, we demonstrate that eBVP probably does not help in proving exponential lower bounds for Boolean formulas: we show that an Ext-PC (even with the Square Root Rule) derivation of any unsatisfiable Boolean formula in CNF from eBVP must be of exponential size.","PeriodicalId":11639,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The power of the Binary Value Principle\",\"authors\":\"Yaroslav Alekseev, E. Hirsch\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2210.17429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The (extended) Binary Value Principle (eBVP: $\\\\sum_{i=1}^n x_i2^{i-1} = -k$ for $k>0$ and $x^2_i=x_i$) has received a lot of attention recently, several lower bounds have been proved for it (Alekseev et al 2020, Alekseev 2021, Part and Tzameret 2021). Also it has been shown (Alekseev et al 2020) that the probabilistically verifiable Ideal Proof System (IPS) (Grochow and Pitassi 2018) together with eBVP polynomially simulates a similar semialgebraic proof system. In this paper we consider Polynomial Calculus with the algebraic version of Tseitin's extension rule (Ext-PC). Contrary to IPS, this is a Cook--Reckhow proof system. We show that in this context eBVP still allows to simulate similar semialgebraic systems. We also prove that it allows to simulate the Square Root Rule (Grigoriev and Hirsch 2003), which is in sharp contrast with the result of (Alekseev 2021) that shows an exponential lower bound on the size of Ext-PC derivations of the Binary Value Principle from its square. On the other hand, we demonstrate that eBVP probably does not help in proving exponential lower bounds for Boolean formulas: we show that an Ext-PC (even with the Square Root Rule) derivation of any unsatisfiable Boolean formula in CNF from eBVP must be of exponential size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.17429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.17429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
(扩展的)二进制值原理(eBVP: $\sum_{i=1}^n x_i2^{i-1} = -k$ for $k>0$和$x^2_i=x_i$)最近受到了很多关注,已经证明了它的几个下界(Alekseev et al 2020, Alekseev 2021, Part and Tzameret 2021)。此外,已经证明(Alekseev等人2020),概率可验证的理想证明系统(IPS) (Grochow和Pitassi 2018)与eBVP一起多项式地模拟了类似的半代数证明系统。本文考虑了多项式微积分的代数版本的tseittin的扩展规则(Ext-PC)。与IPS不同的是,这是库克-雷克豪的证明系统。我们表明,在这种情况下,eBVP仍然允许模拟类似的半代数系统。我们还证明了它允许模拟平方根规则(Grigoriev和Hirsch 2003),这与(Alekseev 2021)的结果形成鲜明对比,后者显示了二进制值原理的Ext-PC衍生的大小的指数下界。另一方面,我们证明了eBVP可能对证明布尔公式的指数下界没有帮助:我们证明了从eBVP推导出CNF中任何不满足的布尔公式的Ext-PC(即使使用平方根规则)必须具有指数大小。
The (extended) Binary Value Principle (eBVP: $\sum_{i=1}^n x_i2^{i-1} = -k$ for $k>0$ and $x^2_i=x_i$) has received a lot of attention recently, several lower bounds have been proved for it (Alekseev et al 2020, Alekseev 2021, Part and Tzameret 2021). Also it has been shown (Alekseev et al 2020) that the probabilistically verifiable Ideal Proof System (IPS) (Grochow and Pitassi 2018) together with eBVP polynomially simulates a similar semialgebraic proof system. In this paper we consider Polynomial Calculus with the algebraic version of Tseitin's extension rule (Ext-PC). Contrary to IPS, this is a Cook--Reckhow proof system. We show that in this context eBVP still allows to simulate similar semialgebraic systems. We also prove that it allows to simulate the Square Root Rule (Grigoriev and Hirsch 2003), which is in sharp contrast with the result of (Alekseev 2021) that shows an exponential lower bound on the size of Ext-PC derivations of the Binary Value Principle from its square. On the other hand, we demonstrate that eBVP probably does not help in proving exponential lower bounds for Boolean formulas: we show that an Ext-PC (even with the Square Root Rule) derivation of any unsatisfiable Boolean formula in CNF from eBVP must be of exponential size.