ZAGHLÛL RÂGHIB MUḤAMMAD AL-NAJJÂR科学解经的方法与原则:tafsr al al-Âyât al- kawniyyah fî al- qur ' n n al- kar述评

Umaiyatus Syarifah, Siti Fahimah
{"title":"ZAGHLÛL RÂGHIB MUḤAMMAD AL-NAJJÂR科学解经的方法与原则:tafsr al al-Âyât al- kawniyyah fî al- qur ' n n al- kar<e:1>述评","authors":"Umaiyatus Syarifah, Siti Fahimah","doi":"10.18860/ua.v21i2.10227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific exegesis is one of the new trends in interpreting the Quran that will continue to be in demand. There are many discussions of science and Quran integration, and the rise of various works of scientific interpretation among scholars and scientists has become the real proof of it. However, some Muslim communities still doubt the validity of scientific interpretations. One of the reasons is because the source of the interpretation is relative and temporal. This evidence, of course, cannot be compared with the Quran, which is absolute. Therefore, a regulation is needed in the application of scientific interpretation. This study aims to examine and explore the methods and principles of the scientific interpretation of the Quran conducted by Zaghlûl Râghib al-Najjâr, in terms of their strengths, shortcomings, and relevance in the interpretation of the Quran. This research is considered qualitative research utilizing library research by analyzing some literatures such as books and journal articles. The results of this research show that the Zaghlûl as a Geologist, who is quite productive with the authority of science he has, does not only interpret Quran scientifically but also explains the procedure of interpretation through methods and principles of interpretation similar to scholars of tafsîr in general. In fact, he may be even be considered more specific and ideal compared to others because he not only complements but also enhances the guidelines and principles of the scientific exegesis that have been used before.","PeriodicalId":53390,"journal":{"name":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ZAGHLÛL RÂGHIB MUḤAMMAD AL-NAJJÂR’S METHODS AND PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC EXEGESIS: A Review of Tafsîr al-Âyât al-Kawniyyah fî al-Qur’ân al-Karîm\",\"authors\":\"Umaiyatus Syarifah, Siti Fahimah\",\"doi\":\"10.18860/ua.v21i2.10227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientific exegesis is one of the new trends in interpreting the Quran that will continue to be in demand. There are many discussions of science and Quran integration, and the rise of various works of scientific interpretation among scholars and scientists has become the real proof of it. However, some Muslim communities still doubt the validity of scientific interpretations. One of the reasons is because the source of the interpretation is relative and temporal. This evidence, of course, cannot be compared with the Quran, which is absolute. Therefore, a regulation is needed in the application of scientific interpretation. This study aims to examine and explore the methods and principles of the scientific interpretation of the Quran conducted by Zaghlûl Râghib al-Najjâr, in terms of their strengths, shortcomings, and relevance in the interpretation of the Quran. This research is considered qualitative research utilizing library research by analyzing some literatures such as books and journal articles. The results of this research show that the Zaghlûl as a Geologist, who is quite productive with the authority of science he has, does not only interpret Quran scientifically but also explains the procedure of interpretation through methods and principles of interpretation similar to scholars of tafsîr in general. In fact, he may be even be considered more specific and ideal compared to others because he not only complements but also enhances the guidelines and principles of the scientific exegesis that have been used before.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.10227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.10227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

科学训诂学是解释《古兰经》的新趋势之一,将继续受到需求。关于科学和《古兰经》的融合有很多讨论,学者和科学家之间各种科学解释作品的兴起已经成为真正的证据。然而,一些穆斯林社区仍然怀疑科学解释的有效性。其中一个原因是因为解释的来源是相对的和暂时的。当然,这些证据不能与《古兰经》相比,因为《古兰经》是绝对的。因此,在科学解释的应用中需要有一个规则。本研究旨在考察和探讨扎格尔·吉布·纳贾尔科学解释《古兰经》的方法和原则,以及这些方法和原则在解释《古兰经》中的优点、缺点和相关性。本研究为质性研究,透过分析书籍及期刊文章等文献,运用图书馆研究的方法。这一研究结果表明,扎格尔作为一名具有科学权威的多产的地质学家,不仅科学地解释《古兰经》,而且通过与一般的塔夫斯学者相似的解释方法和原则来解释解释的程序。事实上,他甚至可以被认为比其他人更具体和更理想,因为他不仅补充而且加强了以前使用的科学训诂的指导方针和原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ZAGHLÛL RÂGHIB MUḤAMMAD AL-NAJJÂR’S METHODS AND PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC EXEGESIS: A Review of Tafsîr al-Âyât al-Kawniyyah fî al-Qur’ân al-Karîm
Scientific exegesis is one of the new trends in interpreting the Quran that will continue to be in demand. There are many discussions of science and Quran integration, and the rise of various works of scientific interpretation among scholars and scientists has become the real proof of it. However, some Muslim communities still doubt the validity of scientific interpretations. One of the reasons is because the source of the interpretation is relative and temporal. This evidence, of course, cannot be compared with the Quran, which is absolute. Therefore, a regulation is needed in the application of scientific interpretation. This study aims to examine and explore the methods and principles of the scientific interpretation of the Quran conducted by Zaghlûl Râghib al-Najjâr, in terms of their strengths, shortcomings, and relevance in the interpretation of the Quran. This research is considered qualitative research utilizing library research by analyzing some literatures such as books and journal articles. The results of this research show that the Zaghlûl as a Geologist, who is quite productive with the authority of science he has, does not only interpret Quran scientifically but also explains the procedure of interpretation through methods and principles of interpretation similar to scholars of tafsîr in general. In fact, he may be even be considered more specific and ideal compared to others because he not only complements but also enhances the guidelines and principles of the scientific exegesis that have been used before.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE REACTUALIZATION OF ‘IṢMAH AL-A’IMMAH CONCEPT: Analysis on the Interpretation of al- Ṭabatabâ’î RATIONAL SUFISM OF HARUN NASUTION: Phenomenological Historical Approach to His Thought and Intellectual Influence THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY, SUFISM, ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND JAVANESE TRADITION ON WOMEN THE JUSTIFICATION OF SHIA IDEOLOGY IN THE QURANIC HERMENEUTICS: Reading the Interpretation of Nâser Makârem Shîrâzî LIVING ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY: Reflection on Mulyadhi Kartanegara's Thought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1