砂岩储层含氟硼酸基质酸化设计与分析的新型模拟装置

M. Qamruzzaman, Mandeep Khan, D. Roy, R. Raman
{"title":"砂岩储层含氟硼酸基质酸化设计与分析的新型模拟装置","authors":"M. Qamruzzaman, Mandeep Khan, D. Roy, R. Raman","doi":"10.2118/205893-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Matrix acidizing with fluoroboric acid (HBF4) has gained special attention as not only it provides deeper penetration of in – situ generated hydrofluoric acid, but also stabilizes formation fines by binding them to the pore surface. While numerous mathematical models exist in literature for design and evaluation of conventional mud acid treatments, fewer attempts have been made in developing a lab validated model that can do so for fluoroboric acid treatments.\n This paper presents a novel mathematical model that has been developed taking into account the chemical kinetics and equilibrium aspects of important reactions and fluid flow inside the reservoir rock. The solution to the governing equations has been obtained through tools of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The model has been validated rigorously through use of state-of-the-art core flooding and ion chromatography setups. The resulting simulator can be used to design an optimum fluoroboric acid treatment by analysing the effects of all the important factors including reservoir temperature, formation mineralogy and job execution details like initial acid concentration, pumping rate, job volume and shut-in time post treatment.\n Simulation results with the developed model indicate that although penetration of fluoroboric acid is much larger compared to mud acid, its overall effect on skin factor is inferior for temperatures less than 90 °C. Stimulation in such wells should be preferred with mud acid which can be followed by fluoroboric acid for fines stabilization. For temperatures more than 120 °C, stimulation effects of fluoroboric acid become comparable to that of mud acid. Under these conditions, it can be used as an alternate fluid to mud acid to prevent issues of secondary and tertiary precipitation. It is found that major stimulation benefits with fluoroboric acid are realized during pumping and subsequent shutting of well, which is a common practice with fluoroboric acid, has relatively smaller effect on skin factor. Apart from design and evaluation of fluoroboric acid treatments, the simulator can also be used for analyzing mud acid and mud acid followed by fluoroboric acid treatments thus enabling the user to select and design the best suited treatment for a given well.","PeriodicalId":10928,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Simulator for Design and Analysis of Matrix Acidizing Jobs with Fluoroboric Acid in Sandstone Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"M. Qamruzzaman, Mandeep Khan, D. Roy, R. Raman\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205893-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Matrix acidizing with fluoroboric acid (HBF4) has gained special attention as not only it provides deeper penetration of in – situ generated hydrofluoric acid, but also stabilizes formation fines by binding them to the pore surface. While numerous mathematical models exist in literature for design and evaluation of conventional mud acid treatments, fewer attempts have been made in developing a lab validated model that can do so for fluoroboric acid treatments.\\n This paper presents a novel mathematical model that has been developed taking into account the chemical kinetics and equilibrium aspects of important reactions and fluid flow inside the reservoir rock. The solution to the governing equations has been obtained through tools of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The model has been validated rigorously through use of state-of-the-art core flooding and ion chromatography setups. The resulting simulator can be used to design an optimum fluoroboric acid treatment by analysing the effects of all the important factors including reservoir temperature, formation mineralogy and job execution details like initial acid concentration, pumping rate, job volume and shut-in time post treatment.\\n Simulation results with the developed model indicate that although penetration of fluoroboric acid is much larger compared to mud acid, its overall effect on skin factor is inferior for temperatures less than 90 °C. Stimulation in such wells should be preferred with mud acid which can be followed by fluoroboric acid for fines stabilization. For temperatures more than 120 °C, stimulation effects of fluoroboric acid become comparable to that of mud acid. Under these conditions, it can be used as an alternate fluid to mud acid to prevent issues of secondary and tertiary precipitation. It is found that major stimulation benefits with fluoroboric acid are realized during pumping and subsequent shutting of well, which is a common practice with fluoroboric acid, has relatively smaller effect on skin factor. Apart from design and evaluation of fluoroboric acid treatments, the simulator can also be used for analyzing mud acid and mud acid followed by fluoroboric acid treatments thus enabling the user to select and design the best suited treatment for a given well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205893-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205893-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

用氟硼酸(HBF4)酸化基质得到了特别的关注,因为它不仅提供了原位生成的氢氟酸更深的渗透,而且还通过将地层细颗粒与孔隙表面结合来稳定地层细颗粒。虽然文献中存在许多用于设计和评估常规泥浆酸处理的数学模型,但在开发可用于氟硼酸处理的实验室验证模型方面的尝试较少。本文提出了一个新的数学模型,该模型考虑了储层岩石内部重要反应和流体流动的化学动力学和平衡方面。利用计算流体力学(CFD)工具得到了控制方程的解。该模型已通过使用最先进的岩心驱油和离子色谱装置进行了严格验证。通过分析所有重要因素的影响,包括储层温度、地层矿物学和作业执行细节(如初始酸浓度、泵送速率、作业体积和处理后关井时间),该模拟器可用于设计最佳氟硼酸处理方案。该模型的模拟结果表明,尽管氟硼酸的渗透性比泥浆酸大得多,但在低于90℃的温度下,氟硼酸对表皮因子的总体影响不如泥浆酸。在这类井中,应该优先使用泥浆酸进行增产,然后可以使用氟硼酸来稳定颗粒。当温度超过120°C时,氟硼酸的增产效果与泥浆酸相当。在这些条件下,它可以作为泥浆酸的替代流体,以防止二次和三次沉淀问题。研究发现,氟硼酸的主要增产效益是在泵送和关井期间实现的,这是氟硼酸的普遍做法,对表皮因子的影响相对较小。除了设计和评估氟硼酸处理之外,该模拟器还可以用于分析泥浆酸和泥浆酸,然后进行氟硼酸处理,从而使用户能够选择和设计最适合特定井的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel Simulator for Design and Analysis of Matrix Acidizing Jobs with Fluoroboric Acid in Sandstone Reservoirs
Matrix acidizing with fluoroboric acid (HBF4) has gained special attention as not only it provides deeper penetration of in – situ generated hydrofluoric acid, but also stabilizes formation fines by binding them to the pore surface. While numerous mathematical models exist in literature for design and evaluation of conventional mud acid treatments, fewer attempts have been made in developing a lab validated model that can do so for fluoroboric acid treatments. This paper presents a novel mathematical model that has been developed taking into account the chemical kinetics and equilibrium aspects of important reactions and fluid flow inside the reservoir rock. The solution to the governing equations has been obtained through tools of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The model has been validated rigorously through use of state-of-the-art core flooding and ion chromatography setups. The resulting simulator can be used to design an optimum fluoroboric acid treatment by analysing the effects of all the important factors including reservoir temperature, formation mineralogy and job execution details like initial acid concentration, pumping rate, job volume and shut-in time post treatment. Simulation results with the developed model indicate that although penetration of fluoroboric acid is much larger compared to mud acid, its overall effect on skin factor is inferior for temperatures less than 90 °C. Stimulation in such wells should be preferred with mud acid which can be followed by fluoroboric acid for fines stabilization. For temperatures more than 120 °C, stimulation effects of fluoroboric acid become comparable to that of mud acid. Under these conditions, it can be used as an alternate fluid to mud acid to prevent issues of secondary and tertiary precipitation. It is found that major stimulation benefits with fluoroboric acid are realized during pumping and subsequent shutting of well, which is a common practice with fluoroboric acid, has relatively smaller effect on skin factor. Apart from design and evaluation of fluoroboric acid treatments, the simulator can also be used for analyzing mud acid and mud acid followed by fluoroboric acid treatments thus enabling the user to select and design the best suited treatment for a given well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Wettability Alteration from Alkali/Nanoparticles/Polymer Flooding - Integrating Data of Imbibition, Contact Angle and Interfacial-Tension to Screen Injection Agents Benchmarking and Field-Testing of the Distributed Quasi-Newton Derivative-Free Optimization Method for Field Development Optimization Aplicability of an Innovative and Light Seismic Approach to Monitor SAGD Operations in Surmont: A Blind Test Four Simple Questions: Decision-Centered Risk and Project Management Gas Migration in Wellbores During Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling PMCD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1