{"title":"无筋砌体竖向弯曲结构可靠性及部分安全系数评定","authors":"Andrea Isfeld, M. Stewart, M. Masia","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2023.2173868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper focuses on a structural reliability-based assessment of clay brick unreinforced masonry (URM) walls subjected to uniformly distributed out-of-plane loads in one-way vertical bending. Stochastic models combining finite element analysis (FEA) and Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) are used to account for spatial variability of the flexural tensile bond strength when estimating the wall failure loads. The strength of URM walls is known to be influenced by the flexural tensile bond strength, which is subject to high spatial variability as batching, workmanship, and environmental exposure alter the strength of this bond. For this assessment, single skin walls have been considered with bond strength statistics seen in typical construction. The model error statistics available for similar walls are combined with the results of the spatial stochastic FEA and probabilistic load models to determine the reliability index corresponding to the Australian Standard for Masonry Structures AS 3700 design of members in vertical bending. It was found that existing levels of reliability exceed target reliabilities, and the capacity reduction factor can be increased from 0.60 to 0.65 for URM walls in one-way vertical bending while still providing an acceptable level of reliability. A sensitivity analysis showed this finding to be robust.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural reliability and partial safety factor assessment of unreinforced masonry in vertical bending\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Isfeld, M. Stewart, M. Masia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2023.2173868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper focuses on a structural reliability-based assessment of clay brick unreinforced masonry (URM) walls subjected to uniformly distributed out-of-plane loads in one-way vertical bending. Stochastic models combining finite element analysis (FEA) and Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) are used to account for spatial variability of the flexural tensile bond strength when estimating the wall failure loads. The strength of URM walls is known to be influenced by the flexural tensile bond strength, which is subject to high spatial variability as batching, workmanship, and environmental exposure alter the strength of this bond. For this assessment, single skin walls have been considered with bond strength statistics seen in typical construction. The model error statistics available for similar walls are combined with the results of the spatial stochastic FEA and probabilistic load models to determine the reliability index corresponding to the Australian Standard for Masonry Structures AS 3700 design of members in vertical bending. It was found that existing levels of reliability exceed target reliabilities, and the capacity reduction factor can be increased from 0.60 to 0.65 for URM walls in one-way vertical bending while still providing an acceptable level of reliability. A sensitivity analysis showed this finding to be robust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2173868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2173868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structural reliability and partial safety factor assessment of unreinforced masonry in vertical bending
ABSTRACT This paper focuses on a structural reliability-based assessment of clay brick unreinforced masonry (URM) walls subjected to uniformly distributed out-of-plane loads in one-way vertical bending. Stochastic models combining finite element analysis (FEA) and Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) are used to account for spatial variability of the flexural tensile bond strength when estimating the wall failure loads. The strength of URM walls is known to be influenced by the flexural tensile bond strength, which is subject to high spatial variability as batching, workmanship, and environmental exposure alter the strength of this bond. For this assessment, single skin walls have been considered with bond strength statistics seen in typical construction. The model error statistics available for similar walls are combined with the results of the spatial stochastic FEA and probabilistic load models to determine the reliability index corresponding to the Australian Standard for Masonry Structures AS 3700 design of members in vertical bending. It was found that existing levels of reliability exceed target reliabilities, and the capacity reduction factor can be increased from 0.60 to 0.65 for URM walls in one-way vertical bending while still providing an acceptable level of reliability. A sensitivity analysis showed this finding to be robust.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.