{"title":"对现有可公开验证的秘密共享方案的关键调查","authors":"Kun Peng","doi":"10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing publicly verifiable secret sharing (PVSS) schemes are surveyed in a critical way in this study. The authors show that they are not so reliable and efficient as they claim or appear. They are limited by assumptions and conditions, vulnerable in important target properties and need more cost in practice. In this study, their actual performance and cost are fairly measured and their drawbacks are pointed out.","PeriodicalId":13305,"journal":{"name":"IET Inf. Secur.","volume":"117 1","pages":"249-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical survey of existing publicly verifiable secret sharing schemes\",\"authors\":\"Kun Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existing publicly verifiable secret sharing (PVSS) schemes are surveyed in a critical way in this study. The authors show that they are not so reliable and efficient as they claim or appear. They are limited by assumptions and conditions, vulnerable in important target properties and need more cost in practice. In this study, their actual performance and cost are fairly measured and their drawbacks are pointed out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"249-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical survey of existing publicly verifiable secret sharing schemes
The existing publicly verifiable secret sharing (PVSS) schemes are surveyed in a critical way in this study. The authors show that they are not so reliable and efficient as they claim or appear. They are limited by assumptions and conditions, vulnerable in important target properties and need more cost in practice. In this study, their actual performance and cost are fairly measured and their drawbacks are pointed out.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
