{"title":"高斯过程的经典正交规则","authors":"T. Karvonen, S. Särkkä","doi":"10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an extension to some previous work on the topic, we show how all classical polynomial-based quadrature rules can be interpreted as Bayesian quadrature rules if the covariance kernel is selected suitably. As the resulting Bayesian quadrature rules have zero posterior integral variance, the results of this article are mostly of theoretical interest in clarifying the relationship between the two different approaches to numerical integration.","PeriodicalId":6542,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 27th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)","volume":"162 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classical quadrature rules via Gaussian processes\",\"authors\":\"T. Karvonen, S. Särkkä\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an extension to some previous work on the topic, we show how all classical polynomial-based quadrature rules can be interpreted as Bayesian quadrature rules if the covariance kernel is selected suitably. As the resulting Bayesian quadrature rules have zero posterior integral variance, the results of this article are mostly of theoretical interest in clarifying the relationship between the two different approaches to numerical integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 27th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)\",\"volume\":\"162 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 27th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 27th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In an extension to some previous work on the topic, we show how all classical polynomial-based quadrature rules can be interpreted as Bayesian quadrature rules if the covariance kernel is selected suitably. As the resulting Bayesian quadrature rules have zero posterior integral variance, the results of this article are mostly of theoretical interest in clarifying the relationship between the two different approaches to numerical integration.