高等教育在线课程实施的测量模型

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society Pub Date : 2018-06-18 DOI:10.20368/1971-8829/1394
Diana Marcela Cardona-Román, J. M. Sánchez-Torres, J. Duart
{"title":"高等教育在线课程实施的测量模型","authors":"Diana Marcela Cardona-Román, J. M. Sánchez-Torres, J. Duart","doi":"10.20368/1971-8829/1394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents the results of expert judgment assessment of a model to measure the implementation of online programs in higher education. Online education is an innovative approach that has been used worldwide by several universities. The evaluation of the implementation of online education is, generally, focused in technology, content quality, instructor and service quality and learner satisfaction. However, it is weak in the structural and functional aspects of the universities. Therefore, a question needs to be answered: Are the dimensions and components of this model suitable for measuring the implementation of online programs? In order to answer that question, this work follows a descriptive statistical approach and four stages: 1. preparing the questionnaire for model assessment; 2. selecting experts; 3. application of the questionnaire; and 4. analysis of results. This study collected 39 completed responses from experts. The Aiken’s V coefficient was used as a measure to quantify the expert agreement. Findings illustrate the importance (88.4%), sufficiency (82%), influence (81.8%) and priority of the model components. As a conclusion, it was found that the dimensions and components of the model are suitable for measuring the implementation of online programs. The expert criterion is an important technique to support models designed from the literature. Limitations, as well as possible research directions, are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":44748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model for Measuring the Implementation of Online Programs in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Diana Marcela Cardona-Román, J. M. Sánchez-Torres, J. Duart\",\"doi\":\"10.20368/1971-8829/1394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents the results of expert judgment assessment of a model to measure the implementation of online programs in higher education. Online education is an innovative approach that has been used worldwide by several universities. The evaluation of the implementation of online education is, generally, focused in technology, content quality, instructor and service quality and learner satisfaction. However, it is weak in the structural and functional aspects of the universities. Therefore, a question needs to be answered: Are the dimensions and components of this model suitable for measuring the implementation of online programs? In order to answer that question, this work follows a descriptive statistical approach and four stages: 1. preparing the questionnaire for model assessment; 2. selecting experts; 3. application of the questionnaire; and 4. analysis of results. This study collected 39 completed responses from experts. The Aiken’s V coefficient was used as a measure to quantify the expert agreement. Findings illustrate the importance (88.4%), sufficiency (82%), influence (81.8%) and priority of the model components. As a conclusion, it was found that the dimensions and components of the model are suitable for measuring the implementation of online programs. The expert criterion is an important technique to support models designed from the literature. Limitations, as well as possible research directions, are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究提出一种评估高等教育线上课程实施情况的专家判断评估模型。在线教育是一种创新的方法,已经被世界各地的几所大学采用。在线教育实施的评价一般集中在技术、内容质量、教师和服务质量以及学习者满意度等方面。然而,它在大学的结构和功能方面是薄弱的。因此,有一个问题需要回答:这个模型的维度和组成部分是否适合衡量在线课程的实施?为了回答这个问题,这项工作遵循描述性统计方法和四个阶段:1。为模型评估准备问卷;2. 选择专家;3.问卷的应用;和4。结果分析。这项研究收集了来自专家的39份完整的回复。采用艾肯V系数作为量化专家同意度的度量。研究结果说明了模型组成部分的重要性(88.4%)、充分性(82%)、影响力(81.8%)和优先级。结果表明,该模型的维度和组成部分适合于衡量在线课程的实施情况。专家准则是支持从文献中设计模型的重要技术。讨论了研究的局限性和可能的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Model for Measuring the Implementation of Online Programs in Higher Education
This study presents the results of expert judgment assessment of a model to measure the implementation of online programs in higher education. Online education is an innovative approach that has been used worldwide by several universities. The evaluation of the implementation of online education is, generally, focused in technology, content quality, instructor and service quality and learner satisfaction. However, it is weak in the structural and functional aspects of the universities. Therefore, a question needs to be answered: Are the dimensions and components of this model suitable for measuring the implementation of online programs? In order to answer that question, this work follows a descriptive statistical approach and four stages: 1. preparing the questionnaire for model assessment; 2. selecting experts; 3. application of the questionnaire; and 4. analysis of results. This study collected 39 completed responses from experts. The Aiken’s V coefficient was used as a measure to quantify the expert agreement. Findings illustrate the importance (88.4%), sufficiency (82%), influence (81.8%) and priority of the model components. As a conclusion, it was found that the dimensions and components of the model are suitable for measuring the implementation of online programs. The expert criterion is an important technique to support models designed from the literature. Limitations, as well as possible research directions, are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society
Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: SIe-L , Italian e-Learning Association, is a non-profit organization who operates as a non-commercial entity to promote scientific research and testing best practices of e-Learning and Distance Education. SIe-L consider these subjects strategic for citizen and companies for their instruction and education.
期刊最新文献
Key issues and pedagogical implications in the design of Digital Educational Escape rooms Symbols and Their Meanings Truth and Truths The Prehistory of Knowledge Ideas as Meanings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1