Muhammad Lukman Fadillah, Nahrowi Nahrowi, Ipah Farihah
{"title":"依赖于印度尼西亚的宪法系统的著名外国品牌的法律保护(MA . 13 . K/ PDT裁决分析)。SUS-HKI - 2017)","authors":"Muhammad Lukman Fadillah, Nahrowi Nahrowi, Ipah Farihah","doi":"10.15408/jlr.v4i6.22331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Protection every right to appear from the result the people creativity in the field of trading and industry, so improvement in the similarity of the peoples to perform passing off reputation on the other side, now therefore mark breaching especially motivated by wished for obtaining of benefit in the goods and services trading with utilized by the other mark which has been famous or popular or with the passing off owner mark or well known mark. Trading of trademark in well known mark speed on selling to the market and then certainly will obtain well benefit in the fast time. The activity unbreach of law which breach right a company known by mentioned passing off reputation. This journal aims to find out how the legal protection of foreign brands in Indonesia against well-known marks which are foreign marks that are not registered in Indonesia in trademark registration in Indonesia, which applies the first to file system principle, in relation to the dispute over the \"EIK\" trademark with the \"EIK, EIKA and EIKA brand\". This type of research uses a qualitative normative juridical research with a statute approach and a case approach. The statute approach in this study refers to Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications, while the case approach is by examining a case that has become a court decision with permanent legal force which in this case is Supreme Court Decision Number 1300 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017. The results of this study indicate that Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications only provides protection for trademark rights based on registration because it adheres to a constitutive system. The consideration of the judges of the Supreme Court in deciding the case between the EIK brand and EIK, EIKA and EIKA has given sufficient and correct consideration because it does not only refer to Law Number 20 of 2016 but also refers to the evidence in court.Key words : Legal Protection, Foreign Well Known Mark, Basically The Same, Constitutive system","PeriodicalId":40374,"journal":{"name":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS MEREK ASING TERKENAL YANG BERGANTUNG PADA SISTEM KONSTITUTIF DI INDONESIA (Analisis Putusan MA No. 1300 K/ PDT.SUS-HKI/ 2017)\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Lukman Fadillah, Nahrowi Nahrowi, Ipah Farihah\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jlr.v4i6.22331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Protection every right to appear from the result the people creativity in the field of trading and industry, so improvement in the similarity of the peoples to perform passing off reputation on the other side, now therefore mark breaching especially motivated by wished for obtaining of benefit in the goods and services trading with utilized by the other mark which has been famous or popular or with the passing off owner mark or well known mark. Trading of trademark in well known mark speed on selling to the market and then certainly will obtain well benefit in the fast time. The activity unbreach of law which breach right a company known by mentioned passing off reputation. This journal aims to find out how the legal protection of foreign brands in Indonesia against well-known marks which are foreign marks that are not registered in Indonesia in trademark registration in Indonesia, which applies the first to file system principle, in relation to the dispute over the \\\"EIK\\\" trademark with the \\\"EIK, EIKA and EIKA brand\\\". This type of research uses a qualitative normative juridical research with a statute approach and a case approach. The statute approach in this study refers to Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications, while the case approach is by examining a case that has become a court decision with permanent legal force which in this case is Supreme Court Decision Number 1300 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017. The results of this study indicate that Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications only provides protection for trademark rights based on registration because it adheres to a constitutive system. The consideration of the judges of the Supreme Court in deciding the case between the EIK brand and EIK, EIKA and EIKA has given sufficient and correct consideration because it does not only refer to Law Number 20 of 2016 but also refers to the evidence in court.Key words : Legal Protection, Foreign Well Known Mark, Basically The Same, Constitutive system\",\"PeriodicalId\":40374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i6.22331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i6.22331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要保护每一项权利都是从人们在贸易和工业领域的创造性产生的结果,从而提高了人们在对方实施假冒声誉的相似性,因此,现在商标侵权尤是由于希望在商品和服务贸易中与已出名或流行的对方商标或与被假冒的所有者商标或驰名商标取得利益的动机。以驰名商标进行商标交易,在较快的时间内向市场销售,必将获得良好的效益。公司所知的假冒名誉权的违法行为。本期刊旨在探讨在印尼商标注册中,针对“EIK”商标与“EIK、EIKA和EIKA品牌”的争议,采用先到先立案的原则,对外国品牌在印尼的驰名商标(即未在印尼注册的外国商标)的法律保护如何进行。这种类型的研究采用定性的规范性法律研究,采用法规方法和案例方法。本研究中的成文法方法指的是2016年关于商标和地理标志的第20号法律,而案例方法是通过审查一个已经成为具有永久法律效力的法院判决的案件,在本案例中是最高法院第1300 K/ pdt . su - hki /2017号判决。本研究的结果表明,2016年第20号《商标和地理标志法》仅提供基于注册的商标权保护,因为它遵循构成体系。最高法院法官在判决EIK品牌与EIK、EIKA和EIKA之间的案件时,不仅参考了2016年第20号法律,而且参考了法庭上的证据,考虑的是充分和正确的。关键字 : 法律保护,外国著名的马克,基本相同,本构系统
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS MEREK ASING TERKENAL YANG BERGANTUNG PADA SISTEM KONSTITUTIF DI INDONESIA (Analisis Putusan MA No. 1300 K/ PDT.SUS-HKI/ 2017)
Abstract Protection every right to appear from the result the people creativity in the field of trading and industry, so improvement in the similarity of the peoples to perform passing off reputation on the other side, now therefore mark breaching especially motivated by wished for obtaining of benefit in the goods and services trading with utilized by the other mark which has been famous or popular or with the passing off owner mark or well known mark. Trading of trademark in well known mark speed on selling to the market and then certainly will obtain well benefit in the fast time. The activity unbreach of law which breach right a company known by mentioned passing off reputation. This journal aims to find out how the legal protection of foreign brands in Indonesia against well-known marks which are foreign marks that are not registered in Indonesia in trademark registration in Indonesia, which applies the first to file system principle, in relation to the dispute over the "EIK" trademark with the "EIK, EIKA and EIKA brand". This type of research uses a qualitative normative juridical research with a statute approach and a case approach. The statute approach in this study refers to Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications, while the case approach is by examining a case that has become a court decision with permanent legal force which in this case is Supreme Court Decision Number 1300 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017. The results of this study indicate that Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications only provides protection for trademark rights based on registration because it adheres to a constitutive system. The consideration of the judges of the Supreme Court in deciding the case between the EIK brand and EIK, EIKA and EIKA has given sufficient and correct consideration because it does not only refer to Law Number 20 of 2016 but also refers to the evidence in court.Key words : Legal Protection, Foreign Well Known Mark, Basically The Same, Constitutive system