家庭托儿服务提供者对能力、自主性和相关性的认知:对幸福感和专业成长的影响

IF 1.9 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Community Work & Family Pub Date : 2022-02-05 DOI:10.1080/13668803.2022.2033163
P. Garner, G. McCarron
{"title":"家庭托儿服务提供者对能力、自主性和相关性的认知:对幸福感和专业成长的影响","authors":"P. Garner, G. McCarron","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2022.2033163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Because a preponderance of research on family child care has centered on children’s experiences, little is known about the effects of caring for these children on the providers themselves. Available research further lessens when intersecting identities and vulnerabilities of family child care providers are considered, as many of them are women, people of color, and/or of immigrant origin. Based on the views of 17 providers from diverse backgrounds, the present qualitative case study explored family child care providers’ experiences of competence, autonomy, and relatedness as key elements of their work. Analyses confirmed the importance of these well-being dimensions, especially as they relate to providers from diverse cultures. We offer recommendations for practices aimed at strengthening both family child care provider and community capacity to provide high quality child care for young children.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":"119 1","pages":"492 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family child care providers’ perceptions of competence, autonomy, and relatedness: implications for well-being and professional growth\",\"authors\":\"P. Garner, G. McCarron\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13668803.2022.2033163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Because a preponderance of research on family child care has centered on children’s experiences, little is known about the effects of caring for these children on the providers themselves. Available research further lessens when intersecting identities and vulnerabilities of family child care providers are considered, as many of them are women, people of color, and/or of immigrant origin. Based on the views of 17 providers from diverse backgrounds, the present qualitative case study explored family child care providers’ experiences of competence, autonomy, and relatedness as key elements of their work. Analyses confirmed the importance of these well-being dimensions, especially as they relate to providers from diverse cultures. We offer recommendations for practices aimed at strengthening both family child care provider and community capacity to provide high quality child care for young children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Work & Family\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"492 - 506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Work & Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2022.2033163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Work & Family","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2022.2033163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于大多数关于家庭儿童保育的研究都集中在儿童的经历上,很少有人知道照顾这些儿童对提供者本身的影响。当考虑到家庭托儿服务提供者的交叉身份和脆弱性时,现有的研究进一步减少,因为他们中的许多人是女性、有色人种和/或移民。基于17位不同背景的家庭托儿服务提供者的观点,本定性案例研究探讨了家庭托儿服务提供者的能力、自主性和相关性作为其工作的关键要素的经验。分析证实了这些幸福维度的重要性,特别是当它们涉及到来自不同文化的提供者时。我们为旨在加强家庭托儿服务提供者和社区为幼儿提供高质量托儿服务的能力的做法提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Family child care providers’ perceptions of competence, autonomy, and relatedness: implications for well-being and professional growth
ABSTRACT Because a preponderance of research on family child care has centered on children’s experiences, little is known about the effects of caring for these children on the providers themselves. Available research further lessens when intersecting identities and vulnerabilities of family child care providers are considered, as many of them are women, people of color, and/or of immigrant origin. Based on the views of 17 providers from diverse backgrounds, the present qualitative case study explored family child care providers’ experiences of competence, autonomy, and relatedness as key elements of their work. Analyses confirmed the importance of these well-being dimensions, especially as they relate to providers from diverse cultures. We offer recommendations for practices aimed at strengthening both family child care provider and community capacity to provide high quality child care for young children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Does the marital pay gap matter? Women’s family-work experiences by earning pattern and ethnic community ‘It’s just my personality.' How employees make sense of their long work hours in a supportive workplace Rational or emotional decisions? Parents’ nonstandard work hours and the justifications for using informal childcare ‘I walk around with a list in my head’: qualitative research on perceived causes and consequences of the unequal gender division of mental labor in Croatian households Home and away: personal autonomy limitation in the liminal work context of fly-in-fly-out camps and psychological distress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1