{"title":"犬双丝虫病诊断","authors":"V. Kravchenko, G. Kravchenko, G. Itin","doi":"10.31016/978-5-6048555-6-0.2023.24.225-228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of our own long-term research, a comparative analysis of clinical \nsigns, and laboratory, immunological and instrumental methods for diagnosing \ndirofilariasis of dogs in the North-Western Caucasus was carried out. As a result \nof the study, it was found that only a comprehensive diagnosis performed in stages \nallows us not only to diagnose most accurately both mature nematodes and their \nmicrofilariae but also to significantly reduce the economic component. Therefore, \nwhen diagnosing dirofilariasis in dogs, it is necessary to take into account only the \nmost specific clinical signs. Laboratory methods should combine both simple express \nmethods and more complex, time-consuming ones. When choosing immunological \ntest systems, it is necessary to take into account not only their economic feasibility, \nbut also the qualitative component, since the main principle of test system operation \nis the reaction to Dirofilaria antigens contained in the blood of an infected dog. They \ncan be used for both individual and group research. When choosing instrumental \ndiagnostic methods such as CT, MRI, ultrasound, etc., which are aimed at detecting \nsexually mature nematodes, and due to their high cost and complexity, it is necessary \nto take into account their expediency based on predicting the disease outcome.","PeriodicalId":22969,"journal":{"name":"THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PARASITIC DISEASE CONTROL","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIROFILARIASIS DIAGNOSTICS IN DOGS\",\"authors\":\"V. Kravchenko, G. Kravchenko, G. Itin\",\"doi\":\"10.31016/978-5-6048555-6-0.2023.24.225-228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a result of our own long-term research, a comparative analysis of clinical \\nsigns, and laboratory, immunological and instrumental methods for diagnosing \\ndirofilariasis of dogs in the North-Western Caucasus was carried out. As a result \\nof the study, it was found that only a comprehensive diagnosis performed in stages \\nallows us not only to diagnose most accurately both mature nematodes and their \\nmicrofilariae but also to significantly reduce the economic component. Therefore, \\nwhen diagnosing dirofilariasis in dogs, it is necessary to take into account only the \\nmost specific clinical signs. Laboratory methods should combine both simple express \\nmethods and more complex, time-consuming ones. When choosing immunological \\ntest systems, it is necessary to take into account not only their economic feasibility, \\nbut also the qualitative component, since the main principle of test system operation \\nis the reaction to Dirofilaria antigens contained in the blood of an infected dog. They \\ncan be used for both individual and group research. When choosing instrumental \\ndiagnostic methods such as CT, MRI, ultrasound, etc., which are aimed at detecting \\nsexually mature nematodes, and due to their high cost and complexity, it is necessary \\nto take into account their expediency based on predicting the disease outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PARASITIC DISEASE CONTROL\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PARASITIC DISEASE CONTROL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31016/978-5-6048555-6-0.2023.24.225-228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PARASITIC DISEASE CONTROL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31016/978-5-6048555-6-0.2023.24.225-228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
As a result of our own long-term research, a comparative analysis of clinical
signs, and laboratory, immunological and instrumental methods for diagnosing
dirofilariasis of dogs in the North-Western Caucasus was carried out. As a result
of the study, it was found that only a comprehensive diagnosis performed in stages
allows us not only to diagnose most accurately both mature nematodes and their
microfilariae but also to significantly reduce the economic component. Therefore,
when diagnosing dirofilariasis in dogs, it is necessary to take into account only the
most specific clinical signs. Laboratory methods should combine both simple express
methods and more complex, time-consuming ones. When choosing immunological
test systems, it is necessary to take into account not only their economic feasibility,
but also the qualitative component, since the main principle of test system operation
is the reaction to Dirofilaria antigens contained in the blood of an infected dog. They
can be used for both individual and group research. When choosing instrumental
diagnostic methods such as CT, MRI, ultrasound, etc., which are aimed at detecting
sexually mature nematodes, and due to their high cost and complexity, it is necessary
to take into account their expediency based on predicting the disease outcome.