同意犯法律确定性在反腐败法中的意义

H. Haryono, Bambang Tri Bawono
{"title":"同意犯法律确定性在反腐败法中的意义","authors":"H. Haryono, Bambang Tri Bawono","doi":"10.30659/ldj.3.3.496-504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze and determine the construction of evil consensus in corruption in Indonesia; legal weaknesses in cases of criminal conspiracy in corrupt criminal acts as well as reconstruction of evil conspiracy in criminal acts of corruption based on progressive law. The research uses a sociological juridical approach. Based on the research conducted, it was found the fact that the implementation of law enforcement in cases of conspiracy related to corruption is currently not fair, this is due to the unclear elements in the criminal act of conspiracy in corruption cases so that existing law enforcement is based on political interests, where the authorities will be able to looking for a way out of the snares of Article 15 of Act No. 31 of 1999 Jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, while parties who do not have the authority to power will not be able to escape the snares of Article 15 of Act No. 31 of 1999 Jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes.","PeriodicalId":55646,"journal":{"name":"Law Environment and Development Journal","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relevance Of Legal Certainty In Criminal Of Consent In The Eradication Of Corruption Law\",\"authors\":\"H. Haryono, Bambang Tri Bawono\",\"doi\":\"10.30659/ldj.3.3.496-504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze and determine the construction of evil consensus in corruption in Indonesia; legal weaknesses in cases of criminal conspiracy in corrupt criminal acts as well as reconstruction of evil conspiracy in criminal acts of corruption based on progressive law. The research uses a sociological juridical approach. Based on the research conducted, it was found the fact that the implementation of law enforcement in cases of conspiracy related to corruption is currently not fair, this is due to the unclear elements in the criminal act of conspiracy in corruption cases so that existing law enforcement is based on political interests, where the authorities will be able to looking for a way out of the snares of Article 15 of Act No. 31 of 1999 Jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, while parties who do not have the authority to power will not be able to escape the snares of Article 15 of Act No. 31 of 1999 Jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Environment and Development Journal\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Environment and Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.3.496-504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Environment and Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.3.496-504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在分析并确定印尼腐败中邪恶共识的建构;腐败犯罪行为中犯罪共谋案件的法律缺陷以及基于进步主义的腐败犯罪行为中邪恶共谋的重构。这项研究采用了社会学和法学的方法。调查结果显示,目前对腐败相关的串谋案件的执法不公平。这是由于串谋犯罪的构成要件不明确,因此现行的执法是基于政治利益,因此当局可以寻找摆脱1999年第31号法律第15条的陷阱的方法。2001年第20号法关于根除腐败犯罪行为,而没有权力的政党将无法逃脱1999年第31号法第15条的陷阱。2001年关于根除腐败犯罪的第20号法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relevance Of Legal Certainty In Criminal Of Consent In The Eradication Of Corruption Law
This study aims to analyze and determine the construction of evil consensus in corruption in Indonesia; legal weaknesses in cases of criminal conspiracy in corrupt criminal acts as well as reconstruction of evil conspiracy in criminal acts of corruption based on progressive law. The research uses a sociological juridical approach. Based on the research conducted, it was found the fact that the implementation of law enforcement in cases of conspiracy related to corruption is currently not fair, this is due to the unclear elements in the criminal act of conspiracy in corruption cases so that existing law enforcement is based on political interests, where the authorities will be able to looking for a way out of the snares of Article 15 of Act No. 31 of 1999 Jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, while parties who do not have the authority to power will not be able to escape the snares of Article 15 of Act No. 31 of 1999 Jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Juridical Analysis in Viewing the Position of Reported Revocation of Complaints A General Criminal One Party by the Reporter in Investigation Process The Criminological Ideas in the Criminal Enforcement of Illegal Logging The Criminal Policy in Efforts to Overcome Crimes Perpetrated by the Indonesian National Army An Investigator's Discretion in State Assets Confiscation Criminal Action Case of Corruption The Legal Protection for Children as Criminal Actors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1