{"title":"剖析农村学生的非凡学业成就","authors":"Li Xiaoliang","doi":"10.1080/10611932.2019.1693798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past three decades, the unprecedented expansion of enrollments for higher education has led to the continual devaluation of university degrees in China (Fan and Ding 2013). Admission to elite universities has become increasingly important for rural youngsters who, without strong guanxi or social capital in the competitive labor market, are eager to move up the social ladder. A growing number of empirical studies (Yang 2006; Luo 2011; Li 2014; Wu, X 2016) attests to the fact that the proportion of rural students is very likely to be negatively associated with the prestige of universities they attend. Studies in the field are usually preoccupied with the economic, social and cultural obstacles that contribute to academic failure among many rural teenagers (Yu 2004; Gao 2011; Xie 2016; Li 2017). But, how small numbers of rural teenagers manage to enter prestigious universities has largely remained a black box. Cultural barriers to academic success are usually more difficult to overcome than poverty (Li 2010; Hannum, An, and Cherng 2011; Bourdieu and Passeron 1979). Researchers argue that, in comparison to their urban counterparts, rural students in China are more likely to encounter academic failure. The meritocratic character of school education (in textbooks, the medium of instruction, and examinations) give primacy to mainstream urban culture (Li 1999; Yu 2004; Wu, J 2016). The distance between the national school curriculum and rural life is revealed in the rural students’ shortage of mainstream cultural capital. This becomes a formidable obstacle in the school career of rural students. Studies in this volume illustrate how rural students’ disadvantage in cultural capital is addressed and compensated by rural families, school teachers, and rural students themselves. The first paper is a collaborative work by Professor Yu Xiulan and her student Han Yan. Professor Yu has long been known in the field for her pioneering work on how cultural capital (the preferences for urban culture in school education) leads to academic failure for the majority of China’s rural students (Yu 2004). Yu and Han illustrate how underprivileged students are successful in gaining admission to University A—a top-tier institution. Yu and Han specify that underprivileged students only receive spiritual or verbal support from their parents, but the learning atmosphere at school, the inspiring teachers, and their outstanding classmates made up for their disadvantages in cultural capital. Moreover, the financial and cultural predicament engenders certain forms of embodied cultural capital unique for underprivileged students, i.e., the determination to upgrade their lives through their own efforts.","PeriodicalId":39911,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Education and Society","volume":"69 1","pages":"297 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking the Extraordinary Academic Success of Rural Students\",\"authors\":\"Li Xiaoliang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611932.2019.1693798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past three decades, the unprecedented expansion of enrollments for higher education has led to the continual devaluation of university degrees in China (Fan and Ding 2013). Admission to elite universities has become increasingly important for rural youngsters who, without strong guanxi or social capital in the competitive labor market, are eager to move up the social ladder. A growing number of empirical studies (Yang 2006; Luo 2011; Li 2014; Wu, X 2016) attests to the fact that the proportion of rural students is very likely to be negatively associated with the prestige of universities they attend. Studies in the field are usually preoccupied with the economic, social and cultural obstacles that contribute to academic failure among many rural teenagers (Yu 2004; Gao 2011; Xie 2016; Li 2017). But, how small numbers of rural teenagers manage to enter prestigious universities has largely remained a black box. Cultural barriers to academic success are usually more difficult to overcome than poverty (Li 2010; Hannum, An, and Cherng 2011; Bourdieu and Passeron 1979). Researchers argue that, in comparison to their urban counterparts, rural students in China are more likely to encounter academic failure. The meritocratic character of school education (in textbooks, the medium of instruction, and examinations) give primacy to mainstream urban culture (Li 1999; Yu 2004; Wu, J 2016). The distance between the national school curriculum and rural life is revealed in the rural students’ shortage of mainstream cultural capital. This becomes a formidable obstacle in the school career of rural students. Studies in this volume illustrate how rural students’ disadvantage in cultural capital is addressed and compensated by rural families, school teachers, and rural students themselves. The first paper is a collaborative work by Professor Yu Xiulan and her student Han Yan. Professor Yu has long been known in the field for her pioneering work on how cultural capital (the preferences for urban culture in school education) leads to academic failure for the majority of China’s rural students (Yu 2004). Yu and Han illustrate how underprivileged students are successful in gaining admission to University A—a top-tier institution. Yu and Han specify that underprivileged students only receive spiritual or verbal support from their parents, but the learning atmosphere at school, the inspiring teachers, and their outstanding classmates made up for their disadvantages in cultural capital. Moreover, the financial and cultural predicament engenders certain forms of embodied cultural capital unique for underprivileged students, i.e., the determination to upgrade their lives through their own efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Education and Society\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"297 - 300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Education and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2019.1693798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2019.1693798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
在过去的三十年里,高等教育招生人数的空前扩张导致了中国大学学位的持续贬值(Fan and Ding 2013)。对于那些在竞争激烈的劳动力市场上没有强大关系或社会资本的农村年轻人来说,进入精英大学变得越来越重要,他们渴望在社会阶梯上往上爬。越来越多的实证研究(Yang 2006;罗2011;李2014年;Wu, X 2016)证明了这样一个事实,即农村学生的比例很可能与他们所上大学的声望负相关。该领域的研究通常专注于经济、社会和文化障碍,这些障碍导致了许多农村青少年的学业失败(Yu 2004;高2011;谢2016;李2017年)。但是,少数农村青少年如何进入名牌大学在很大程度上仍然是一个黑盒子。阻碍学业成功的文化障碍通常比贫困更难克服(Li 2010;Hannum, An, and cheng 2011;Bourdieu and Passeron 1979)。研究人员认为,与城市学生相比,中国农村学生更容易遭遇学业失败。学校教育(在教科书、教学媒介和考试中)的精英化特征将主流城市文化置于首位(Li 1999;于2004年;Wu, J 2016)。国家学校课程与农村生活的距离表现在农村学生对主流文化资本的缺乏上。这成为农村学生求学生涯中的一个巨大障碍。本卷中的研究说明了农村家庭、学校教师和农村学生自己如何解决和补偿农村学生在文化资本方面的劣势。第一篇论文是由于秀兰教授和她的学生韩燕合作完成的。于教授在文化资本(学校教育中对城市文化的偏好)如何导致大多数中国农村学生的学业失败方面的开创性工作早已在该领域广为人知(Yu 2004)。于和韩说明了贫困家庭的学生是如何成功进入一流大学的。于和韩指出,贫困学生只能从父母那里得到精神上或口头上的支持,但学校的学习氛围、鼓舞人心的老师和优秀的同学弥补了他们在文化资本方面的劣势。此外,经济和文化困境使贫困学生产生了某种独特的文化资本体现形式,即通过自己的努力提升自己生活的决心。
Unpacking the Extraordinary Academic Success of Rural Students
Over the past three decades, the unprecedented expansion of enrollments for higher education has led to the continual devaluation of university degrees in China (Fan and Ding 2013). Admission to elite universities has become increasingly important for rural youngsters who, without strong guanxi or social capital in the competitive labor market, are eager to move up the social ladder. A growing number of empirical studies (Yang 2006; Luo 2011; Li 2014; Wu, X 2016) attests to the fact that the proportion of rural students is very likely to be negatively associated with the prestige of universities they attend. Studies in the field are usually preoccupied with the economic, social and cultural obstacles that contribute to academic failure among many rural teenagers (Yu 2004; Gao 2011; Xie 2016; Li 2017). But, how small numbers of rural teenagers manage to enter prestigious universities has largely remained a black box. Cultural barriers to academic success are usually more difficult to overcome than poverty (Li 2010; Hannum, An, and Cherng 2011; Bourdieu and Passeron 1979). Researchers argue that, in comparison to their urban counterparts, rural students in China are more likely to encounter academic failure. The meritocratic character of school education (in textbooks, the medium of instruction, and examinations) give primacy to mainstream urban culture (Li 1999; Yu 2004; Wu, J 2016). The distance between the national school curriculum and rural life is revealed in the rural students’ shortage of mainstream cultural capital. This becomes a formidable obstacle in the school career of rural students. Studies in this volume illustrate how rural students’ disadvantage in cultural capital is addressed and compensated by rural families, school teachers, and rural students themselves. The first paper is a collaborative work by Professor Yu Xiulan and her student Han Yan. Professor Yu has long been known in the field for her pioneering work on how cultural capital (the preferences for urban culture in school education) leads to academic failure for the majority of China’s rural students (Yu 2004). Yu and Han illustrate how underprivileged students are successful in gaining admission to University A—a top-tier institution. Yu and Han specify that underprivileged students only receive spiritual or verbal support from their parents, but the learning atmosphere at school, the inspiring teachers, and their outstanding classmates made up for their disadvantages in cultural capital. Moreover, the financial and cultural predicament engenders certain forms of embodied cultural capital unique for underprivileged students, i.e., the determination to upgrade their lives through their own efforts.
期刊介绍:
How is China"s vast population being educated in the home, the school, and the workplace? Chinese Education and Society is essential for insight into the latest Chinese thinking on educational policy and practice, educational reform and development, pedagogical theory and methods, colleges and universities, schools and families, as well as the education for diverse social groups across gender and youth, urban and rural, mainstream and minorities. It features unabridged translations of the most important articles in the field from Chinese sources, including scholarly journals and collections of articles published in book form. It also provides refereed research on specific themes.