{"title":"政策、多中心主义和实践:可持续性转型中的治理想象","authors":"Thomas S. J. Smith","doi":"10.1111/AREA.12560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper foregrounds the under - theorised figure of the\npolicy maker in the environmental social sciences. To do so, it\nfocuses on the case of “social practice theory” (SPT), a school\nof thought which has gained prominence in human geography and\nfurther afield in recent years. The paper outlines the context\nof environmental policy literatures and identifies a tension in\nmany treatments of the topic by practice - oriented scholars:\nwhile it focuses on emergent social change, the traditional\npolicy imaginary which has circulated in this literature often\nportrays benign, top - down policy makers who, given adequate\ninformation, are amenable to conducting the right policy\n“intervention.” A “governance on the inside” approach is\nproposed as an alternative imaginary, drawing from prominent\nwork on polycentric governance and community economies in\ngeographical and economic scholarship, as well as more recent\nwork in SPT itself. Opportunities for a geographical mapping of\npolicy difference and reflexive engagement are highlighted,\nhinting at rich future possibilities.","PeriodicalId":72297,"journal":{"name":"Area (Oxford, England)","volume":"358 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy, polycentrism, and practice: Governance imaginaries in sustainability transitions\",\"authors\":\"Thomas S. J. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/AREA.12560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper foregrounds the under - theorised figure of the\\npolicy maker in the environmental social sciences. To do so, it\\nfocuses on the case of “social practice theory” (SPT), a school\\nof thought which has gained prominence in human geography and\\nfurther afield in recent years. The paper outlines the context\\nof environmental policy literatures and identifies a tension in\\nmany treatments of the topic by practice - oriented scholars:\\nwhile it focuses on emergent social change, the traditional\\npolicy imaginary which has circulated in this literature often\\nportrays benign, top - down policy makers who, given adequate\\ninformation, are amenable to conducting the right policy\\n“intervention.” A “governance on the inside” approach is\\nproposed as an alternative imaginary, drawing from prominent\\nwork on polycentric governance and community economies in\\ngeographical and economic scholarship, as well as more recent\\nwork in SPT itself. Opportunities for a geographical mapping of\\npolicy difference and reflexive engagement are highlighted,\\nhinting at rich future possibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Area (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"358 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Area (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/AREA.12560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/AREA.12560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Policy, polycentrism, and practice: Governance imaginaries in sustainability transitions
This paper foregrounds the under - theorised figure of the
policy maker in the environmental social sciences. To do so, it
focuses on the case of “social practice theory” (SPT), a school
of thought which has gained prominence in human geography and
further afield in recent years. The paper outlines the context
of environmental policy literatures and identifies a tension in
many treatments of the topic by practice - oriented scholars:
while it focuses on emergent social change, the traditional
policy imaginary which has circulated in this literature often
portrays benign, top - down policy makers who, given adequate
information, are amenable to conducting the right policy
“intervention.” A “governance on the inside” approach is
proposed as an alternative imaginary, drawing from prominent
work on polycentric governance and community economies in
geographical and economic scholarship, as well as more recent
work in SPT itself. Opportunities for a geographical mapping of
policy difference and reflexive engagement are highlighted,
hinting at rich future possibilities.