政策、多中心主义和实践:可持续性转型中的治理想象

Thomas S. J. Smith
{"title":"政策、多中心主义和实践:可持续性转型中的治理想象","authors":"Thomas S. J. Smith","doi":"10.1111/AREA.12560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper foregrounds the under - theorised figure of the\npolicy maker in the environmental social sciences. To do so, it\nfocuses on the case of “social practice theory” (SPT), a school\nof thought which has gained prominence in human geography and\nfurther afield in recent years. The paper outlines the context\nof environmental policy literatures and identifies a tension in\nmany treatments of the topic by practice - oriented scholars:\nwhile it focuses on emergent social change, the traditional\npolicy imaginary which has circulated in this literature often\nportrays benign, top - down policy makers who, given adequate\ninformation, are amenable to conducting the right policy\n“intervention.” A “governance on the inside” approach is\nproposed as an alternative imaginary, drawing from prominent\nwork on polycentric governance and community economies in\ngeographical and economic scholarship, as well as more recent\nwork in SPT itself. Opportunities for a geographical mapping of\npolicy difference and reflexive engagement are highlighted,\nhinting at rich future possibilities.","PeriodicalId":72297,"journal":{"name":"Area (Oxford, England)","volume":"358 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy, polycentrism, and practice: Governance imaginaries in sustainability transitions\",\"authors\":\"Thomas S. J. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/AREA.12560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper foregrounds the under - theorised figure of the\\npolicy maker in the environmental social sciences. To do so, it\\nfocuses on the case of “social practice theory” (SPT), a school\\nof thought which has gained prominence in human geography and\\nfurther afield in recent years. The paper outlines the context\\nof environmental policy literatures and identifies a tension in\\nmany treatments of the topic by practice - oriented scholars:\\nwhile it focuses on emergent social change, the traditional\\npolicy imaginary which has circulated in this literature often\\nportrays benign, top - down policy makers who, given adequate\\ninformation, are amenable to conducting the right policy\\n“intervention.” A “governance on the inside” approach is\\nproposed as an alternative imaginary, drawing from prominent\\nwork on polycentric governance and community economies in\\ngeographical and economic scholarship, as well as more recent\\nwork in SPT itself. Opportunities for a geographical mapping of\\npolicy difference and reflexive engagement are highlighted,\\nhinting at rich future possibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Area (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"358 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Area (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/AREA.12560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/AREA.12560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文着重介绍了环境社会科学中政策制定者的理论不足形象。为此,本文以“社会实践理论”(SPT)为例,这是近年来在人文地理学和其他领域崭露头角的一个思想流派。本文概述了环境政策文献的背景,并确定了以实践为导向的学者对该主题的许多处理中的紧张关系:虽然它关注的是新兴的社会变革,但在这些文献中流传的传统政策想象通常描绘了良性的、自上而下的政策制定者,他们在获得充分信息的情况下,能够进行正确的政策“干预”。“内部治理”方法是另一种设想,借鉴了地理学和经济学领域关于多中心治理和社区经济的重要工作,以及最近在SPT本身的工作。报告强调了对政策差异和反身性接触进行地理映射的机会,暗示了未来丰富的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Policy, polycentrism, and practice: Governance imaginaries in sustainability transitions
This paper foregrounds the under - theorised figure of the policy maker in the environmental social sciences. To do so, it focuses on the case of “social practice theory” (SPT), a school of thought which has gained prominence in human geography and further afield in recent years. The paper outlines the context of environmental policy literatures and identifies a tension in many treatments of the topic by practice - oriented scholars: while it focuses on emergent social change, the traditional policy imaginary which has circulated in this literature often portrays benign, top - down policy makers who, given adequate information, are amenable to conducting the right policy “intervention.” A “governance on the inside” approach is proposed as an alternative imaginary, drawing from prominent work on polycentric governance and community economies in geographical and economic scholarship, as well as more recent work in SPT itself. Opportunities for a geographical mapping of policy difference and reflexive engagement are highlighted, hinting at rich future possibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Value Capture by Companies of Different Ownership, Tier, Size, and Distance to Market: A Cross‐Sectoral Analysis “A canary is supposed to sit in a cage and look at someone else’s happiness”: Domestic rewilding in fin‐de‐siècle st. petersburg Rewilding: An emotional nature Towards a critical geopolitics of China‐US rivalry: Pericentricity, Regional Conflicts and Transnational Connections Cities of neurodiversity: New directions for an urban geography of neurodiversity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1