使用护士中介的标准化招生过程的影响

Andrea Blome, Kraftin E Schreyer, D. Pandya
{"title":"使用护士中介的标准化招生过程的影响","authors":"Andrea Blome, Kraftin E Schreyer, D. Pandya","doi":"10.5430/jha.v9n3p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Transitions of care, including those between the Emergency Department (ED) and Internal Medicine (IM) for hospital admissions are complicated, variable processes that impact efficiency and patient safety. At our institution, a new, standardized admissions process that involved a nurse coordinator intermediary who served a dual role of facilitating admissions and overseeing bed board was implemented in July 2017. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the new process on ED throughput and safety outcomes of admitted patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the admissions process for patients at an urban, academic ED was conducted over a 4-month period preceding and following process implementation. ED metrics, including admission decision to ED departure time, were reviewed. In addition, the number of admitted patients upgraded to the intensive care unit (ICU) via a rapid response team (RRT-ICU) within 24 hours of admission and direct physician-physician handoffs were analyzed via surveys of both IM and EM physicians. Results: A total of 1,109 admissions were reviewed. The new admissions process resulted in a statistically significant decrease in boarding times for admitted ED patients ( p = .03). The number of RRT-ICUs within 24 hours of admission did not change as a result of the intervention ( p = .5). Direct physician handoffs increased, but not significantly, according to surveys of IM ( p = .39) and EM physicians ( p = .34). Conclusions: The implementation of a standardized admissions process utilizing a nurse intermediary improved provider communication and ED throughput without negatively impacting patient safety.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"72 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a standardized admissions process using a nurse intermediary\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Blome, Kraftin E Schreyer, D. Pandya\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/jha.v9n3p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Transitions of care, including those between the Emergency Department (ED) and Internal Medicine (IM) for hospital admissions are complicated, variable processes that impact efficiency and patient safety. At our institution, a new, standardized admissions process that involved a nurse coordinator intermediary who served a dual role of facilitating admissions and overseeing bed board was implemented in July 2017. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the new process on ED throughput and safety outcomes of admitted patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the admissions process for patients at an urban, academic ED was conducted over a 4-month period preceding and following process implementation. ED metrics, including admission decision to ED departure time, were reviewed. In addition, the number of admitted patients upgraded to the intensive care unit (ICU) via a rapid response team (RRT-ICU) within 24 hours of admission and direct physician-physician handoffs were analyzed via surveys of both IM and EM physicians. Results: A total of 1,109 admissions were reviewed. The new admissions process resulted in a statistically significant decrease in boarding times for admitted ED patients ( p = .03). The number of RRT-ICUs within 24 hours of admission did not change as a result of the intervention ( p = .5). Direct physician handoffs increased, but not significantly, according to surveys of IM ( p = .39) and EM physicians ( p = .34). Conclusions: The implementation of a standardized admissions process utilizing a nurse intermediary improved provider communication and ED throughput without negatively impacting patient safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Administration\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v9n3p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v9n3p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:包括急诊科(ED)和内科(IM)之间的住院治疗过渡是复杂多变的过程,影响效率和患者安全。在我们的机构,2017年7月实施了一项新的标准化招生流程,其中包括一名护士协调员中间人,他扮演着促进招生和监督床位管理的双重角色。我们旨在评估新流程对急诊科吞吐量和住院患者安全结果的影响。方法:回顾性分析在一个城市,学术性急诊科的患者入院过程进行了前后4个月的过程实施。评估了ED的指标,包括ED的录取决定和离开时间。此外,通过对IM和EM医生的调查,分析了入院后24小时内通过快速反应小组(RRT-ICU)升级到重症监护病房(ICU)的入院患者数量和直接的医师-医师交接。结果:共审查了1109例入院患者。新的入院流程导致入院急诊科患者的住院时间显著减少(p = .03)。入院24小时内rrt - icu数量未因干预而改变(p = 0.5)。根据对内科医生(p = 0.39)和急诊医生(p = 0.34)的调查,直接的医生交接增加了,但并不显著。结论:使用护士中介的标准化入院流程的实施改善了提供者的沟通和急诊科的吞吐量,而不会对患者安全产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of a standardized admissions process using a nurse intermediary
Objective: Transitions of care, including those between the Emergency Department (ED) and Internal Medicine (IM) for hospital admissions are complicated, variable processes that impact efficiency and patient safety. At our institution, a new, standardized admissions process that involved a nurse coordinator intermediary who served a dual role of facilitating admissions and overseeing bed board was implemented in July 2017. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the new process on ED throughput and safety outcomes of admitted patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the admissions process for patients at an urban, academic ED was conducted over a 4-month period preceding and following process implementation. ED metrics, including admission decision to ED departure time, were reviewed. In addition, the number of admitted patients upgraded to the intensive care unit (ICU) via a rapid response team (RRT-ICU) within 24 hours of admission and direct physician-physician handoffs were analyzed via surveys of both IM and EM physicians. Results: A total of 1,109 admissions were reviewed. The new admissions process resulted in a statistically significant decrease in boarding times for admitted ED patients ( p = .03). The number of RRT-ICUs within 24 hours of admission did not change as a result of the intervention ( p = .5). Direct physician handoffs increased, but not significantly, according to surveys of IM ( p = .39) and EM physicians ( p = .34). Conclusions: The implementation of a standardized admissions process utilizing a nurse intermediary improved provider communication and ED throughput without negatively impacting patient safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The reality of patient bodily waste management: Nurse perceptions of current practice & staff safety Facilitators and barriers for high-reliability training in medical centers Quality of care and emergency department throughput during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community health system Pandemic in a Community Health System Comparison of nursing staffing ratio in selected safety net and non-safety net hospitals in the United States Challenges and opportunities in achieving secure hospital clinical mobility management: An illustrative use case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1