概念面纱的多元基础

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Economics and Law-A Convivium Pub Date : 2022-02-25 DOI:10.1515/ael-2021-0049
Julia Morley
{"title":"概念面纱的多元基础","authors":"Julia Morley","doi":"10.1515/ael-2021-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The theoretical foundations of Karthik Ramanna’s “Unreliable Accounts” are investigated, demonstrating the pluralistic approach which underlies his critique of the accountability and governance of the FASB. In particular, I highlight Ramanna’s use of multiple units of analysis and theoretical frameworks in his arguments for the existence of conceptual veiling, but I question the extent to which extent Ramanna’s account can be viewed as a generalisable causal explanation. Finally, avenues for future research are noted.","PeriodicalId":43657,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Economics and Law-A Convivium","volume":"68 1","pages":"191 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pluralistic Foundations of Conceptual Veiling\",\"authors\":\"Julia Morley\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ael-2021-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The theoretical foundations of Karthik Ramanna’s “Unreliable Accounts” are investigated, demonstrating the pluralistic approach which underlies his critique of the accountability and governance of the FASB. In particular, I highlight Ramanna’s use of multiple units of analysis and theoretical frameworks in his arguments for the existence of conceptual veiling, but I question the extent to which extent Ramanna’s account can be viewed as a generalisable causal explanation. Finally, avenues for future research are noted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Economics and Law-A Convivium\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"191 - 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Economics and Law-A Convivium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Economics and Law-A Convivium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文对Karthik Ramanna的《不可靠的账目》的理论基础进行了研究,展示了多元化的方法,这是他对美国财务会计准则委员会问责制和治理批评的基础。特别是,我强调拉曼纳在他关于概念面纱存在的论证中使用了多个分析单位和理论框架,但我质疑拉曼纳的描述在多大程度上可以被视为一种可推广的因果解释。最后,指出了未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Pluralistic Foundations of Conceptual Veiling
Abstract The theoretical foundations of Karthik Ramanna’s “Unreliable Accounts” are investigated, demonstrating the pluralistic approach which underlies his critique of the accountability and governance of the FASB. In particular, I highlight Ramanna’s use of multiple units of analysis and theoretical frameworks in his arguments for the existence of conceptual veiling, but I question the extent to which extent Ramanna’s account can be viewed as a generalisable causal explanation. Finally, avenues for future research are noted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Accounting Research as Bayesian Inference to the Best Explanation Frontmatter The Elephant in the Room: p-hacking and Accounting Research The Failure of a Pure Patent Market Statistical versus Economic Significance in Accounting: A Reality Check
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1