缺血性脑卒中患者血管内溶栓治疗及功能状况

R. Jabłońska, Anna Wronkowska, R. Ślusarz, Karolina Filipska, G. Meder, Paweł Sokal
{"title":"缺血性脑卒中患者血管内溶栓治疗及功能状况","authors":"R. Jabłońska, Anna Wronkowska, R. Ślusarz, Karolina Filipska, G. Meder, Paweł Sokal","doi":"10.15225/pnn.2019.8.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Stroke is treated as a direct threat to life. Mechanical thrombectomy used as an independent treatment or in combination with systemic thrombolysis is currently the standard care in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Aim. Evaluation of the functional status of patients after ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis or thrombectomy. Material and Methods. The study involved 50 patients hospitalized due to ischemic stroke. Standardized research tools were used: the Rankin scale, the Barthel scale and the Functional Index “Repty” (WFR). The study was conducted twice in one patient: on the first and ninth day after the treatment. The collected material was developed statistically. Results. Most of the respondents were men — 62%. Thrombolytic treatment was used in all subjects, and thrombectomy in 26% people. Analyses showed that there were differences in the Barthel scale level Z = 4.87; p < 0.001, Rankin Z = 4.80; p < 0.001 and WFR Z = 4.83; p < 0.001. The age of the respondents was related negatively to the Barthel scale score on the 1st day ρ = -0.51; p < 0.001 and the 9th day ρ = -0.53; p < 0.001 and the result in the WFR scale on the 1st day ρ = -0.54; p < 0.001 and the 9th day ρ = -0.52; p < 0.001. Conclusions. The performance of the subjects on the 1st day of treatment was worse than on the 9th day. People who were only treated with thrombolysis had better results in fitness tests and had a lower level of disability than people treated with thrombolysis and thrombectomy. (JNNN 2019;8(2):69–77)","PeriodicalId":22776,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular and Thrombolytic Therapy and the Functional Status of Patients after Ischemic Stroke\",\"authors\":\"R. Jabłońska, Anna Wronkowska, R. Ślusarz, Karolina Filipska, G. Meder, Paweł Sokal\",\"doi\":\"10.15225/pnn.2019.8.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Stroke is treated as a direct threat to life. Mechanical thrombectomy used as an independent treatment or in combination with systemic thrombolysis is currently the standard care in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Aim. Evaluation of the functional status of patients after ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis or thrombectomy. Material and Methods. The study involved 50 patients hospitalized due to ischemic stroke. Standardized research tools were used: the Rankin scale, the Barthel scale and the Functional Index “Repty” (WFR). The study was conducted twice in one patient: on the first and ninth day after the treatment. The collected material was developed statistically. Results. Most of the respondents were men — 62%. Thrombolytic treatment was used in all subjects, and thrombectomy in 26% people. Analyses showed that there were differences in the Barthel scale level Z = 4.87; p < 0.001, Rankin Z = 4.80; p < 0.001 and WFR Z = 4.83; p < 0.001. The age of the respondents was related negatively to the Barthel scale score on the 1st day ρ = -0.51; p < 0.001 and the 9th day ρ = -0.53; p < 0.001 and the result in the WFR scale on the 1st day ρ = -0.54; p < 0.001 and the 9th day ρ = -0.52; p < 0.001. Conclusions. The performance of the subjects on the 1st day of treatment was worse than on the 9th day. People who were only treated with thrombolysis had better results in fitness tests and had a lower level of disability than people treated with thrombolysis and thrombectomy. (JNNN 2019;8(2):69–77)\",\"PeriodicalId\":22776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15225/pnn.2019.8.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15225/pnn.2019.8.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

介绍。中风被视为对生命的直接威胁。机械取栓作为一种独立治疗或与全身溶栓联合使用是目前缺血性卒中治疗的标准治疗方法。的目标。溶栓或取栓对缺血性脑卒中患者功能状态的评价。材料和方法。该研究涉及50名因缺血性中风住院的患者。采用标准化的研究工具:Rankin量表、Barthel量表和功能指数(function Index " Repty ", WFR)。该研究在一名患者中进行了两次:治疗后的第一天和第九天。收集到的资料进行了统计分析。结果。大多数受访者是男性(62%)。所有患者均采用溶栓治疗,26%患者采用取栓。分析表明,在Barthel量表水平上存在差异Z = 4.87;p < 0.001, Rankin Z = 4.80;p < 0.001, WFR Z = 4.83;P < 0.001。被调查者的年龄与第1天Barthel量表得分呈负相关ρ = -0.51;P < 0.001,第9天ρ = -0.53;p < 0.001,第1天WFR量表结果ρ = -0.54;P < 0.001,第9天ρ = -0.52;P < 0.001。结论。受试者在治疗第1天的表现较第9天差。只接受溶栓治疗的人比接受溶栓和取栓治疗的人在体能测试中有更好的结果,残疾程度也更低。(JNNN 2019; 8 (2): 69 - 77)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endovascular and Thrombolytic Therapy and the Functional Status of Patients after Ischemic Stroke
Introduction. Stroke is treated as a direct threat to life. Mechanical thrombectomy used as an independent treatment or in combination with systemic thrombolysis is currently the standard care in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Aim. Evaluation of the functional status of patients after ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis or thrombectomy. Material and Methods. The study involved 50 patients hospitalized due to ischemic stroke. Standardized research tools were used: the Rankin scale, the Barthel scale and the Functional Index “Repty” (WFR). The study was conducted twice in one patient: on the first and ninth day after the treatment. The collected material was developed statistically. Results. Most of the respondents were men — 62%. Thrombolytic treatment was used in all subjects, and thrombectomy in 26% people. Analyses showed that there were differences in the Barthel scale level Z = 4.87; p < 0.001, Rankin Z = 4.80; p < 0.001 and WFR Z = 4.83; p < 0.001. The age of the respondents was related negatively to the Barthel scale score on the 1st day ρ = -0.51; p < 0.001 and the 9th day ρ = -0.53; p < 0.001 and the result in the WFR scale on the 1st day ρ = -0.54; p < 0.001 and the 9th day ρ = -0.52; p < 0.001. Conclusions. The performance of the subjects on the 1st day of treatment was worse than on the 9th day. People who were only treated with thrombolysis had better results in fitness tests and had a lower level of disability than people treated with thrombolysis and thrombectomy. (JNNN 2019;8(2):69–77)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acquisition and Development of Scrub Nursing Skills in Robotic-Assisted Cranial and Spinal Neurosurgical Procedures Assessment of the Myasthenia Gravis Patients’ Quality of Life Stress and Anxiety in Neurosurgical Patients before Surgery Functioning of the Integrated System of Care for Stroke Patients Treated with Mechanical Thrombectomy Based on the Case Report Developing a Scale to Evaluate the Fatalism of Epilepsy in Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1