分区域中心一级严重急性中毒分析毒理学服务模式

M. J. Lee, J. Cho, Haewon Jung, J. Park, Yun-Jeong Kim, J. Seo, Hanseok Chang, Si-Yeon Won
{"title":"分区域中心一级严重急性中毒分析毒理学服务模式","authors":"M. J. Lee, J. Cho, Haewon Jung, J. Park, Yun-Jeong Kim, J. Seo, Hanseok Chang, Si-Yeon Won","doi":"10.1080/24734306.2021.1913913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Acute poisoning may necessitate identification of the toxic agent; however, several acutely poisoned patients are treated with minimal laboratory assistance. We investigated whether focused reference to laboratory toxicology tests conducted during a pilot project for a subregional analytical toxicology service influences treatment decisions. Patients with acute poisoning presented to the level 1 regional emergency medical center from May 2018 to April 2019 were initially reviewed. Poison samples were referred to the subregional toxicological analytical service. In total, 253 substance samples were tested among 111 patients during the study. According to the reported drug levels, 3 (1.2%) samples contained lethal doses, 49 (19%) had toxic levels, and 28 (11%) contained detectable levels of a lethal toxin or pesticide. Disagreement between the clinical assessment and laboratory analyses was found for 62 patients (fair kappa = 0.24, 56%), and they often had lower Glasgow Coma Scale, higher severity scores, older age, and less likelihood of receiving gastrointestinal decontamination. The regional analytical toxicology services were helpful for diagnostic planning and therapeutic management of acute poisoning. For seriously poisoned patients with inconsistent histories, it is necessary to reevaluate the classic therapeutic process based on the medical history.","PeriodicalId":23139,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology communications","volume":"32 1","pages":"102 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical toxicology service model at the subregional center level for severe acute poisoning\",\"authors\":\"M. J. Lee, J. Cho, Haewon Jung, J. Park, Yun-Jeong Kim, J. Seo, Hanseok Chang, Si-Yeon Won\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24734306.2021.1913913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Acute poisoning may necessitate identification of the toxic agent; however, several acutely poisoned patients are treated with minimal laboratory assistance. We investigated whether focused reference to laboratory toxicology tests conducted during a pilot project for a subregional analytical toxicology service influences treatment decisions. Patients with acute poisoning presented to the level 1 regional emergency medical center from May 2018 to April 2019 were initially reviewed. Poison samples were referred to the subregional toxicological analytical service. In total, 253 substance samples were tested among 111 patients during the study. According to the reported drug levels, 3 (1.2%) samples contained lethal doses, 49 (19%) had toxic levels, and 28 (11%) contained detectable levels of a lethal toxin or pesticide. Disagreement between the clinical assessment and laboratory analyses was found for 62 patients (fair kappa = 0.24, 56%), and they often had lower Glasgow Coma Scale, higher severity scores, older age, and less likelihood of receiving gastrointestinal decontamination. The regional analytical toxicology services were helpful for diagnostic planning and therapeutic management of acute poisoning. For seriously poisoned patients with inconsistent histories, it is necessary to reevaluate the classic therapeutic process based on the medical history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology communications\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24734306.2021.1913913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24734306.2021.1913913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性中毒可能需要鉴定有毒物质;然而,一些急性中毒患者的治疗只需要很少的实验室协助。我们调查了在次区域分析毒理学服务试点项目期间进行的实验室毒理学测试是否会影响治疗决策。初步审查了2018年5月至2019年4月在一级地区急救医疗中心就诊的急性中毒患者。毒物样本送交分区域毒理学分析处。在研究期间,111名患者共检测了253份物质样本。根据报告的药物水平,3个(1.2%)样品含有致死剂量,49个(19%)样品具有毒性,28个(11%)样品含有可检测到的致死毒素或农药水平。62例患者的临床评估和实验室分析不一致(公平kappa = 0.24, 56%),他们通常具有较低的格拉斯哥昏迷量表,较高的严重程度评分,年龄较大,接受胃肠净化的可能性较小。区域分析毒理学服务有助于急性中毒的诊断规划和治疗管理。对于病史不一致的严重中毒患者,有必要根据病史重新评估经典的治疗过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analytical toxicology service model at the subregional center level for severe acute poisoning
Abstract Acute poisoning may necessitate identification of the toxic agent; however, several acutely poisoned patients are treated with minimal laboratory assistance. We investigated whether focused reference to laboratory toxicology tests conducted during a pilot project for a subregional analytical toxicology service influences treatment decisions. Patients with acute poisoning presented to the level 1 regional emergency medical center from May 2018 to April 2019 were initially reviewed. Poison samples were referred to the subregional toxicological analytical service. In total, 253 substance samples were tested among 111 patients during the study. According to the reported drug levels, 3 (1.2%) samples contained lethal doses, 49 (19%) had toxic levels, and 28 (11%) contained detectable levels of a lethal toxin or pesticide. Disagreement between the clinical assessment and laboratory analyses was found for 62 patients (fair kappa = 0.24, 56%), and they often had lower Glasgow Coma Scale, higher severity scores, older age, and less likelihood of receiving gastrointestinal decontamination. The regional analytical toxicology services were helpful for diagnostic planning and therapeutic management of acute poisoning. For seriously poisoned patients with inconsistent histories, it is necessary to reevaluate the classic therapeutic process based on the medical history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermal injury after “huffing” compressed air duster: a case report Cyanide poisoning and organ donation in Australia: a case report Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre Abstracts of the Toxicology and Poisons Network Australasia (TAPNA) 2024 Annual Scientific Meeting (Melbourne, Victoria). Death from bongkrekic acid toxicity: first report in North America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1