“先发制人的压制”——法官声称有权在数字证据被发现之前就认定其不可采信

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.15394/JDFSL.2012.1132

B. Simpson

{"title":"“先发制人的压制”——法官声称有权在数字证据被发现之前就认定其不可采信","authors":"B. Simpson","doi":"10.15394/JDFSL.2012.1132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vermont state prosecutors have asked the Vermont Supreme Court to end a state trial judge’s practice of attaching conditions to computer warrants. The Vermont judge’s conditions are drawn from five conditions established in the 2009 decision of the 9 Circuit Court of Appeals in the Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. case (CDT II). This is the first time the validity of the “CDT conditions” will be decided by a state court of final jurisdiction in the United States.","PeriodicalId":43224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Preemptive Suppression” – Judges Claim the Right to Find Digital Evidence Inadmissible Before It Is Even Discovered\",\"authors\":\"B. Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.15394/JDFSL.2012.1132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vermont state prosecutors have asked the Vermont Supreme Court to end a state trial judge’s practice of attaching conditions to computer warrants. The Vermont judge’s conditions are drawn from five conditions established in the 2009 decision of the 9 Circuit Court of Appeals in the Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. case (CDT II). This is the first time the validity of the “CDT conditions” will be decided by a state court of final jurisdiction in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15394/JDFSL.2012.1132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15394/JDFSL.2012.1132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

佛蒙特州检察官要求佛蒙特州最高法院终止一名州初审法官对电脑搜查令附加条件的做法。佛蒙特州法官的条件是从2009年第九巡回上诉法院在综合药物测试公司案(CDT II)中确定的五个条件中提取出来的。这是美国第一次由具有最终管辖权的州法院决定“CDT条件”的有效性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

“Preemptive Suppression” – Judges Claim the Right to Find Digital Evidence Inadmissible Before It Is Even Discovered

Vermont state prosecutors have asked the Vermont Supreme Court to end a state trial judge’s practice of attaching conditions to computer warrants. The Vermont judge’s conditions are drawn from five conditions established in the 2009 decision of the 9 Circuit Court of Appeals in the Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. case (CDT II). This is the first time the validity of the “CDT conditions” will be decided by a state court of final jurisdiction in the United States.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

10 weeks