多元主义、消除主义与艺术的定义

C. Bartel, Jack M. C. Kwong
{"title":"多元主义、消除主义与艺术的定义","authors":"C. Bartel, Jack M. C. Kwong","doi":"10.33134/eeja.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional monist theories of art fail to account for the diversity of objects that intuitively strike many as belonging to the category art. Some today argue that the solution to this problem requires the adoption of some version of pluralism to account for the diversity of art. We examine one recent attempt, which holds that the correct account of art must recognize the plurality of concepts of art. However, we criticize this account of concept pluralism as being unable to offer an explanation of why some concept is an art concept. Instead, many of the disagreements over the definition of art could be reconciled by recognizing that works of art can be valued in a plurality of ways. By recognizing a plurality of values for art, we claim further that the definition of art becomes a non-issue.","PeriodicalId":53570,"journal":{"name":"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pluralism, Eliminativism, and the Definition of Art\",\"authors\":\"C. Bartel, Jack M. C. Kwong\",\"doi\":\"10.33134/eeja.213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional monist theories of art fail to account for the diversity of objects that intuitively strike many as belonging to the category art. Some today argue that the solution to this problem requires the adoption of some version of pluralism to account for the diversity of art. We examine one recent attempt, which holds that the correct account of art must recognize the plurality of concepts of art. However, we criticize this account of concept pluralism as being unable to offer an explanation of why some concept is an art concept. Instead, many of the disagreements over the definition of art could be reconciled by recognizing that works of art can be valued in a plurality of ways. By recognizing a plurality of values for art, we claim further that the definition of art becomes a non-issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

传统的一元论艺术理论无法解释直观地认为属于艺术范畴的对象的多样性。今天有些人认为,解决这个问题需要采用某种形式的多元主义来解释艺术的多样性。我们研究最近的一种尝试,它认为对艺术的正确描述必须认识到艺术概念的多元性。然而,我们批评这种概念多元化的解释,因为它无法解释为什么某些概念是一个艺术概念。相反,许多关于艺术定义的分歧可以通过认识到艺术作品可以以多种方式进行估价来调和。通过承认艺术的多重价值,我们进一步宣称艺术的定义不再是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pluralism, Eliminativism, and the Definition of Art
Traditional monist theories of art fail to account for the diversity of objects that intuitively strike many as belonging to the category art. Some today argue that the solution to this problem requires the adoption of some version of pluralism to account for the diversity of art. We examine one recent attempt, which holds that the correct account of art must recognize the plurality of concepts of art. However, we criticize this account of concept pluralism as being unable to offer an explanation of why some concept is an art concept. Instead, many of the disagreements over the definition of art could be reconciled by recognizing that works of art can be valued in a plurality of ways. By recognizing a plurality of values for art, we claim further that the definition of art becomes a non-issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics
Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Emilia Dilke on Aesthetics Aesthetic Engagement and Soundscape: A Case of Convenience Store Woman, a Contemporary Japanese Novel Looking through Images: A Phenomenology of Visual Media by Emmanuel Alloa The Implied Designer of Digital Games Contemporary Art and the Problem of Indiscernibles: An Adverbialist Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1