平衡平台规划中的收益和灵活性损失

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Engineering Pub Date : 2018-03-04 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3134037
P. Jana, S. Graves, M. Grunow
{"title":"平衡平台规划中的收益和灵活性损失","authors":"P. Jana, S. Graves, M. Grunow","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3134037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manufacturers using product platforms target economies of scale and scope. However, they face the challenge of a reduced ability to react to a dynamic environment, because a platform provides the technological basis for all assigned products. When manufacturers launch new platforms, the timing is crucial. Technological innovations that have been successfully developed prior to the platform launch can be incorporated into the platform. A higher level of innovation increases the revenues. After the platform launch, the individual product development can be initiated. A shorter development time increases the development costs. As a consequence, manufacturers have to trade-off increased revenues due to a higher level of innovation against increased development costs due to expedited product development. Our paper introduces a stylized optimization model for this dynamic platform planning problem based on a stochastic process for capturing the uncertainty of innovations. We find that the optimal policy for the platform launch is a time-dependent threshold of the observed innovation level. Based on a case from the automotive industry, we find that manufacturers can suffer a loss of flexibility that significantly reduces platform benefits. It even outweighs the economies of scale. Hence, manufacturers have to weigh properly the trade-offs to ensure that the combined effect of scale and scope economies does lead to a positive impact of platforms. In particular, during the product-to-platform assignment, manufacturers need to consider the loss of flexibility, which depends on the product introduction schedule and the product heterogeneity of the products assigned to a platform.","PeriodicalId":49886,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Engineering","volume":"159 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Benefits and Flexibility Losses in Platform Planning\",\"authors\":\"P. Jana, S. Graves, M. Grunow\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3134037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Manufacturers using product platforms target economies of scale and scope. However, they face the challenge of a reduced ability to react to a dynamic environment, because a platform provides the technological basis for all assigned products. When manufacturers launch new platforms, the timing is crucial. Technological innovations that have been successfully developed prior to the platform launch can be incorporated into the platform. A higher level of innovation increases the revenues. After the platform launch, the individual product development can be initiated. A shorter development time increases the development costs. As a consequence, manufacturers have to trade-off increased revenues due to a higher level of innovation against increased development costs due to expedited product development. Our paper introduces a stylized optimization model for this dynamic platform planning problem based on a stochastic process for capturing the uncertainty of innovations. We find that the optimal policy for the platform launch is a time-dependent threshold of the observed innovation level. Based on a case from the automotive industry, we find that manufacturers can suffer a loss of flexibility that significantly reduces platform benefits. It even outweighs the economies of scale. Hence, manufacturers have to weigh properly the trade-offs to ensure that the combined effect of scale and scope economies does lead to a positive impact of platforms. In particular, during the product-to-platform assignment, manufacturers need to consider the loss of flexibility, which depends on the product introduction schedule and the product heterogeneity of the products assigned to a platform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing Engineering\",\"volume\":\"159 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3134037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3134037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

制造商使用产品平台的目标是规模经济和范围经济。然而,他们面临着对动态环境的反应能力降低的挑战,因为平台为所有指定的产品提供了技术基础。当制造商推出新平台时,时机至关重要。在平台启动之前已经成功开发的技术创新可以纳入平台。创新水平越高,收入就越高。在平台发布之后,可以启动单个产品的开发。较短的开发时间增加了开发成本。因此,制造商必须权衡由于更高水平的创新而增加的收入和由于加速产品开发而增加的开发成本。本文介绍了一种基于随机过程的动态平台规划问题的程式化优化模型,以捕捉创新的不确定性。我们发现平台启动的最优策略是观察到的创新水平的一个与时间相关的阈值。基于汽车行业的一个案例,我们发现制造商可能会遭受灵活性的损失,这大大降低了平台的收益。它甚至超过了规模经济。因此,制造商必须适当权衡取舍,以确保规模经济和范围经济的综合效应确实会带来平台的积极影响。特别是,在产品到平台的分配过程中,制造商需要考虑灵活性的损失,这取决于产品引入时间表和分配给平台的产品的产品异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing Benefits and Flexibility Losses in Platform Planning
Manufacturers using product platforms target economies of scale and scope. However, they face the challenge of a reduced ability to react to a dynamic environment, because a platform provides the technological basis for all assigned products. When manufacturers launch new platforms, the timing is crucial. Technological innovations that have been successfully developed prior to the platform launch can be incorporated into the platform. A higher level of innovation increases the revenues. After the platform launch, the individual product development can be initiated. A shorter development time increases the development costs. As a consequence, manufacturers have to trade-off increased revenues due to a higher level of innovation against increased development costs due to expedited product development. Our paper introduces a stylized optimization model for this dynamic platform planning problem based on a stochastic process for capturing the uncertainty of innovations. We find that the optimal policy for the platform launch is a time-dependent threshold of the observed innovation level. Based on a case from the automotive industry, we find that manufacturers can suffer a loss of flexibility that significantly reduces platform benefits. It even outweighs the economies of scale. Hence, manufacturers have to weigh properly the trade-offs to ensure that the combined effect of scale and scope economies does lead to a positive impact of platforms. In particular, during the product-to-platform assignment, manufacturers need to consider the loss of flexibility, which depends on the product introduction schedule and the product heterogeneity of the products assigned to a platform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering 工程技术-工程:制造
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Capacity Co-Opetition in Service Clusters with Waiting-area Entertainment Cloud-Kitchens in High-Density Cities: Economies of Scale Through Co-Location Credit Chain and Sectoral Co-movement: A Multi-Region Investigation Approximations for the Lead Time Variance: A Forecasting and Inventory Evaluation Reselling or Agency Selling? Consumer Valuation, Quality Design, and Manufacturers' Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1