寻找“资本主义精神”:德国历史学派与资本主义起源之争

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE International Critical Thought Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21598282.2022.2035793
J. Milios
{"title":"寻找“资本主义精神”:德国历史学派与资本主义起源之争","authors":"J. Milios","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2022.2035793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The question of the origins or genesis of capitalism preoccupied the writers of the so-called German Historical School and led to fierce disputes between them in the first three decades of the twentieth century. Its “background” was Marx's theory of capitalism and its genesis in Capital, against which the authors under consideration attempted to formulate an alternative historical analysis and theory. The leading figure of the school at the time, Werner Sombart, introduced the notion of the “spirit of capitalism” as an independent, decisive factor in the birth of the capitalist system, which pre-existed capitalism. The birth of capitalism took place, according to Sombart, when the activities of certain economic subjects who owned large amounts of money merged with the activities of other economic subjects already possessing a certain economic spirit, which proved to be pertinent to capitalism. The idea of a pre-existing “spirit” which enabled the genesis of capitalism was later adopted by Max Weber who radically modified Sombart's reasoning in a direction compatible with Nassau William Senior's theory of abstinence. Despite its poor documentation of historical facts and social theory, Weber's approach still fascinates certain social scientists, probably because it is being perceived as constituting an “anti-Marxist Manifesto.”","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"34 1","pages":"81 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeking the “Spirit of Capitalism”: The German Historical School and the Controversies about the Origins of Capitalism\",\"authors\":\"J. Milios\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21598282.2022.2035793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The question of the origins or genesis of capitalism preoccupied the writers of the so-called German Historical School and led to fierce disputes between them in the first three decades of the twentieth century. Its “background” was Marx's theory of capitalism and its genesis in Capital, against which the authors under consideration attempted to formulate an alternative historical analysis and theory. The leading figure of the school at the time, Werner Sombart, introduced the notion of the “spirit of capitalism” as an independent, decisive factor in the birth of the capitalist system, which pre-existed capitalism. The birth of capitalism took place, according to Sombart, when the activities of certain economic subjects who owned large amounts of money merged with the activities of other economic subjects already possessing a certain economic spirit, which proved to be pertinent to capitalism. The idea of a pre-existing “spirit” which enabled the genesis of capitalism was later adopted by Max Weber who radically modified Sombart's reasoning in a direction compatible with Nassau William Senior's theory of abstinence. Despite its poor documentation of historical facts and social theory, Weber's approach still fascinates certain social scientists, probably because it is being perceived as constituting an “anti-Marxist Manifesto.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":43179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Critical Thought\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Critical Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2022.2035793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2022.2035793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

资本主义的起源问题一直困扰着所谓的德国历史学派的作者,并在20世纪头30年引发了他们之间的激烈争论。它的“背景”是马克思的资本主义理论及其在《资本论》中的起源,本文作者试图以此为背景,形成一种另类的历史分析和理论。当时该学派的领军人物维尔纳·桑巴特(Werner Sombart)介绍了“资本主义精神”的概念,认为资本主义制度的诞生是一个独立的、决定性的因素,而资本主义制度先于资本主义存在。根据桑巴特的说法,资本主义的诞生发生在某些拥有大量货币的经济主体的活动与其他已经拥有某种经济精神的经济主体的活动相结合的时候,这被证明与资本主义有关。一种预先存在的“精神”促成了资本主义的起源,这一观点后来被马克斯·韦伯采纳,他从根本上修改了桑巴特的推理,使之与拿骚·威廉·西尼尔的禁欲理论相一致。尽管韦伯的方法对历史事实和社会理论的记录很差,但它仍然吸引着某些社会科学家,可能是因为它被视为构成了“反马克思主义宣言”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seeking the “Spirit of Capitalism”: The German Historical School and the Controversies about the Origins of Capitalism
ABSTRACT The question of the origins or genesis of capitalism preoccupied the writers of the so-called German Historical School and led to fierce disputes between them in the first three decades of the twentieth century. Its “background” was Marx's theory of capitalism and its genesis in Capital, against which the authors under consideration attempted to formulate an alternative historical analysis and theory. The leading figure of the school at the time, Werner Sombart, introduced the notion of the “spirit of capitalism” as an independent, decisive factor in the birth of the capitalist system, which pre-existed capitalism. The birth of capitalism took place, according to Sombart, when the activities of certain economic subjects who owned large amounts of money merged with the activities of other economic subjects already possessing a certain economic spirit, which proved to be pertinent to capitalism. The idea of a pre-existing “spirit” which enabled the genesis of capitalism was later adopted by Max Weber who radically modified Sombart's reasoning in a direction compatible with Nassau William Senior's theory of abstinence. Despite its poor documentation of historical facts and social theory, Weber's approach still fascinates certain social scientists, probably because it is being perceived as constituting an “anti-Marxist Manifesto.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
The Colors of Content Moderation: A Portfolio of Brazilian Resistances to Coloniality on Instagram The Origin, Current Situation and Trends of Racism in the West The Law of Uneven Development and the Transition to a New World System: On the Spatial Political Economy of Socialism From “Authentic” to Actual Marxist Educational Theory: Advancing Revolutionary Pedagogies Medicine, Dissent and the “Chloroquinization” of Truth: Brazil and Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1