阿尔及利亚家庭法典中妇女的话语表现:“婚姻及其解除的案例”CDA方法

Zohra Bekhedda
{"title":"阿尔及利亚家庭法典中妇女的话语表现:“婚姻及其解除的案例”CDA方法","authors":"Zohra Bekhedda","doi":"10.33422/icshe.2018.12.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research analyses the discursive representation of women in the Algerian family code of 2005. It draws on critical discourse analysis (henceforth CDA) framework in an effort to shed light on the way women are discursively represented in the amended Algerian family code. For this particular purpose, the aforementioned legal text is linguistically examined following a CDA framework with a special emphasis on Van Leewen’s(1996,2008) sociosemantic model of analysis. The latter is employed to explore how women as ‘social actors’ are represented aiming to uncover the way power, dominance, bias, and ideologies are maintained in the target discourse. The analyses of this study reveal that the Algerian family code maintains and perpetuates women’s inferior position. These findings indicate that gender bias and asymmetrical power relations are enacted in the Algerian Family code in relation to marriage and its dissolution.","PeriodicalId":20564,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Discursive Representation of Women in the Algerian Family Code “The Case of Marriage and its Dissolution” CDA Approach\",\"authors\":\"Zohra Bekhedda\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/icshe.2018.12.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present research analyses the discursive representation of women in the Algerian family code of 2005. It draws on critical discourse analysis (henceforth CDA) framework in an effort to shed light on the way women are discursively represented in the amended Algerian family code. For this particular purpose, the aforementioned legal text is linguistically examined following a CDA framework with a special emphasis on Van Leewen’s(1996,2008) sociosemantic model of analysis. The latter is employed to explore how women as ‘social actors’ are represented aiming to uncover the way power, dominance, bias, and ideologies are maintained in the target discourse. The analyses of this study reveal that the Algerian family code maintains and perpetuates women’s inferior position. These findings indicate that gender bias and asymmetrical power relations are enacted in the Algerian Family code in relation to marriage and its dissolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/icshe.2018.12.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/icshe.2018.12.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析2005年阿尔及利亚家庭法典中女性的话语表现。它利用批评性话语分析(以下简称批评性话语分析)框架,努力阐明妇女在修订后的阿尔及利亚家庭法典中的话语表现方式。出于这个特殊目的,上述法律文本在语言上是按照CDA框架进行检查的,特别强调Van Leewen(1996,2008)的社会语义学分析模型。后者被用来探索女性作为“社会行动者”是如何被表现出来的,旨在揭示权力、支配、偏见和意识形态在目标话语中的维持方式。本研究的分析表明,阿尔及利亚的家庭法典维持并延续了妇女的劣势地位。这些调查结果表明,阿尔及利亚《家庭法》规定了与婚姻及其解除有关的性别偏见和不对称的权力关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Discursive Representation of Women in the Algerian Family Code “The Case of Marriage and its Dissolution” CDA Approach
The present research analyses the discursive representation of women in the Algerian family code of 2005. It draws on critical discourse analysis (henceforth CDA) framework in an effort to shed light on the way women are discursively represented in the amended Algerian family code. For this particular purpose, the aforementioned legal text is linguistically examined following a CDA framework with a special emphasis on Van Leewen’s(1996,2008) sociosemantic model of analysis. The latter is employed to explore how women as ‘social actors’ are represented aiming to uncover the way power, dominance, bias, and ideologies are maintained in the target discourse. The analyses of this study reveal that the Algerian family code maintains and perpetuates women’s inferior position. These findings indicate that gender bias and asymmetrical power relations are enacted in the Algerian Family code in relation to marriage and its dissolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enabling pathways: refugee background students in higher education Buddhist philosophical teachings for environmental conservation Morphological markers of the noun in Eastern dialects of Khanty The Benefits of Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL) on Indonesian High School Students’ Engagement in Learning English as Foreign Language (EFL) Race and Ethnicity in Durban in the 21st Century: Some Glimpses into Contemporary Realities and Future Possibilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1