在美国,与非“选择退出”州相比,“选择退出”州的医疗保险受益人获得麻醉服务的机会没有增加。

E. Sun, T. R. Miller, Nicholas M. Halzack
{"title":"在美国,与非“选择退出”州相比,“选择退出”州的医疗保险受益人获得麻醉服务的机会没有增加。","authors":"E. Sun, T. R. Miller, Nicholas M. Halzack","doi":"10.1213/XAA.0000000000000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, anesthesia care can be provided by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists. Since 2001, 17 states have exercised their right to \"opt-out\" of the federal requirement that a physician supervise the administration of anesthesia by a nurse anesthetist, with the majority citing increased access to anesthesia care as the rationale for their decision. By using Medicare data, we found that most (4 of 5) cohorts of \"opt-out\" states likely experienced smaller growth in anesthesia utilization rates compared with non-\"opt-out\" states, suggesting that opt-out was not associated with an increase in access to anesthesia care.","PeriodicalId":6824,"journal":{"name":"A&A Case Reports ","volume":"24 1","pages":"283-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the United States, \\\"Opt-Out\\\" States Show No Increase in Access to Anesthesia Services for Medicare Beneficiaries Compared with Non-\\\"Opt-Out\\\" States.\",\"authors\":\"E. Sun, T. R. Miller, Nicholas M. Halzack\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/XAA.0000000000000293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, anesthesia care can be provided by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists. Since 2001, 17 states have exercised their right to \\\"opt-out\\\" of the federal requirement that a physician supervise the administration of anesthesia by a nurse anesthetist, with the majority citing increased access to anesthesia care as the rationale for their decision. By using Medicare data, we found that most (4 of 5) cohorts of \\\"opt-out\\\" states likely experienced smaller growth in anesthesia utilization rates compared with non-\\\"opt-out\\\" states, suggesting that opt-out was not associated with an increase in access to anesthesia care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A&A Case Reports \",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"283-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A&A Case Reports \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A&A Case Reports ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在美国,麻醉护理可以由麻醉师或麻醉师护士提供。自2001年以来,已有17个州行使了“选择退出”联邦要求的权利,即由医生监督麻醉师护士的麻醉管理,大多数州认为麻醉护理的增加是他们做出决定的理由。通过使用医疗保险数据,我们发现,与非“选择退出”的州相比,“选择退出”州的大多数(5个中的4个)队列麻醉使用率的增长可能较小,这表明选择退出与麻醉护理的增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In the United States, "Opt-Out" States Show No Increase in Access to Anesthesia Services for Medicare Beneficiaries Compared with Non-"Opt-Out" States.
In the United States, anesthesia care can be provided by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists. Since 2001, 17 states have exercised their right to "opt-out" of the federal requirement that a physician supervise the administration of anesthesia by a nurse anesthetist, with the majority citing increased access to anesthesia care as the rationale for their decision. By using Medicare data, we found that most (4 of 5) cohorts of "opt-out" states likely experienced smaller growth in anesthesia utilization rates compared with non-"opt-out" states, suggesting that opt-out was not associated with an increase in access to anesthesia care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognition of a Thoracic Epidural Hematoma in the Setting of Transient Paralysis: A Case Report. Management of a Patient Requiring Intrathecal Drain Insertion and Removal in the Setting of Concomitant Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Clopidogrel and Aspirin: A Case Report. General Anesthesia and Fabry Disease: A Case Report. Case Report of Midazolam Withdrawal-Induced Catatonia in a 9-Year-Old Patient. A Case Report: Subanesthetic Ketamine Infusion for Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain Produces Urinary Urge Incontinence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1