David M. Troendle, Bhaskar Gurram, Rong Huang, B. Barth
{"title":"静脉注射布洛芬预防儿童ercp后胰腺炎:一项随机安慰剂对照可行性研究","authors":"David M. Troendle, Bhaskar Gurram, Rong Huang, B. Barth","doi":"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is reported to occur in up to 11% of pediatric patients. To date, no study has prospectively evaluated an intervention to prevent PEP in children. It is unclear if such a study is even feasible. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of studying IV Ibuprofen for PEP prevention in the pediatric population. METHODS This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility study. Patients < 19 years of age undergoing ERCP were randomized to receive 10 mg/kg IV Ibuprofen (max of 800 mg) or placebo (saline) at the time of ERCP. The primary outcome was PEP. Secondary outcomes included post-ERCP related bleeding, rates of other procedural and medication related adverse events. RESULTS 58 patients were randomized and received either IV Ibuprofen or placebo. Pre-procedure and procedure related factors were not significantly different between the groups except that patients in the placebo group tended to weigh less (48.7 kg vs 63.7 kg, p = 0.03). There were 7 episodes of PEP (12%). PEP was less frequently identified in the Ibuprofen group than the control group (7% vs. 17%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Mean post-procedural abdominal pain scores were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group than the control group (1.1 vs 3.1, p = 0.01) and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure was significantly lower in Ibuprofen group than the control group (3% vs. 38%, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in procedure related or drug related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Post-procedural pain scores and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group. The current study provides encouraging, but only very weak evidence that IV ibuprofen decreases PEP in children. Power analysis suggests that a small handful of high-volume pediatric centers would be able to perform an adequate clinical trial in a reasonable time frame. Focusing on all cause post-procedural pain (PEP and non-PEP) may allow for a more efficiency study design and be just as clinically relevant.","PeriodicalId":16725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IV Ibuprofen for Prevention of Post-Ercp Pancreatitis in Children: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"David M. Troendle, Bhaskar Gurram, Rong Huang, B. Barth\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is reported to occur in up to 11% of pediatric patients. To date, no study has prospectively evaluated an intervention to prevent PEP in children. It is unclear if such a study is even feasible. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of studying IV Ibuprofen for PEP prevention in the pediatric population. METHODS This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility study. Patients < 19 years of age undergoing ERCP were randomized to receive 10 mg/kg IV Ibuprofen (max of 800 mg) or placebo (saline) at the time of ERCP. The primary outcome was PEP. Secondary outcomes included post-ERCP related bleeding, rates of other procedural and medication related adverse events. RESULTS 58 patients were randomized and received either IV Ibuprofen or placebo. Pre-procedure and procedure related factors were not significantly different between the groups except that patients in the placebo group tended to weigh less (48.7 kg vs 63.7 kg, p = 0.03). There were 7 episodes of PEP (12%). PEP was less frequently identified in the Ibuprofen group than the control group (7% vs. 17%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Mean post-procedural abdominal pain scores were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group than the control group (1.1 vs 3.1, p = 0.01) and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure was significantly lower in Ibuprofen group than the control group (3% vs. 38%, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in procedure related or drug related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Post-procedural pain scores and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group. The current study provides encouraging, but only very weak evidence that IV ibuprofen decreases PEP in children. Power analysis suggests that a small handful of high-volume pediatric centers would be able to perform an adequate clinical trial in a reasonable time frame. Focusing on all cause post-procedural pain (PEP and non-PEP) may allow for a more efficiency study design and be just as clinically relevant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
背景:据报道,高达11%的儿科患者发生ercp后胰腺炎(PEP)。迄今为止,尚无研究对预防儿童PEP的干预措施进行前瞻性评估。目前还不清楚这样的研究是否可行。目的评价静脉注射布洛芬预防小儿PEP的可行性。方法前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照可行性研究。< 19岁接受ERCP的患者在ERCP时随机接受10 mg/kg IV布洛芬(最大800 mg)或安慰剂(生理盐水)。主要结果为PEP。次要结局包括ercp术后相关出血、其他手术和药物相关不良事件发生率。结果58例患者随机分为静脉布洛芬组和安慰剂组。术前和手术相关因素在两组之间没有显著差异,除了安慰剂组患者倾向于体重更轻(48.7 kg vs 63.7 kg, p = 0.03)。PEP 7次(12%)。布洛芬组PEP的发生率低于对照组(7%对17%),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.42)。静脉注射布洛芬组术后腹痛平均评分显著低于对照组(1.1比3.1,p = 0.01),术后腹痛加重患者数显著低于对照组(3%比38%,p = 0.002)。手术相关或药物相关的不良事件没有显著差异。结论静脉注射布洛芬组术后疼痛评分和术后腹痛加重的患者数量明显低于静脉注射布洛芬组。目前的研究提供了令人鼓舞的证据,但只有非常微弱的证据表明静脉注射布洛芬可以降低儿童的PEP。功效分析表明,少数大容量儿科中心能够在合理的时间框架内进行充分的临床试验。关注所有原因的术后疼痛(PEP和非PEP)可能允许更有效的研究设计,并且与临床相关。
IV Ibuprofen for Prevention of Post-Ercp Pancreatitis in Children: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Feasibility Study.
BACKGROUND Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is reported to occur in up to 11% of pediatric patients. To date, no study has prospectively evaluated an intervention to prevent PEP in children. It is unclear if such a study is even feasible. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of studying IV Ibuprofen for PEP prevention in the pediatric population. METHODS This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility study. Patients < 19 years of age undergoing ERCP were randomized to receive 10 mg/kg IV Ibuprofen (max of 800 mg) or placebo (saline) at the time of ERCP. The primary outcome was PEP. Secondary outcomes included post-ERCP related bleeding, rates of other procedural and medication related adverse events. RESULTS 58 patients were randomized and received either IV Ibuprofen or placebo. Pre-procedure and procedure related factors were not significantly different between the groups except that patients in the placebo group tended to weigh less (48.7 kg vs 63.7 kg, p = 0.03). There were 7 episodes of PEP (12%). PEP was less frequently identified in the Ibuprofen group than the control group (7% vs. 17%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Mean post-procedural abdominal pain scores were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group than the control group (1.1 vs 3.1, p = 0.01) and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure was significantly lower in Ibuprofen group than the control group (3% vs. 38%, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in procedure related or drug related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Post-procedural pain scores and the number of patients who had increased abdominal pain after the procedure were significantly lower in the IV Ibuprofen group. The current study provides encouraging, but only very weak evidence that IV ibuprofen decreases PEP in children. Power analysis suggests that a small handful of high-volume pediatric centers would be able to perform an adequate clinical trial in a reasonable time frame. Focusing on all cause post-procedural pain (PEP and non-PEP) may allow for a more efficiency study design and be just as clinically relevant.