使用匹配样本程序的刺激分类的发展:样本分类与比较分类

Joseph E. Spradlin, Richard R. Saunders
{"title":"使用匹配样本程序的刺激分类的发展:样本分类与比较分类","authors":"Joseph E. Spradlin,&nbsp;Richard R. Saunders","doi":"10.1016/0270-4684(86)90005-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Four experiments were conducted to investigate the development of stimulus classes using matching-to-sample procedures. The first three experiments involved teaching subjects to select four different comparison stimuli in response to a single sample stimulus. In the fourth experiment, the subjects were taught to select a single comparison stimulus in response to four different sample stimuli. Only one of the six subjects who received single-sample, multiple-comparison training demonstrated stimulus class development. All three subjects who were given training in selecting a single comparison stimulus in response to multiple samples demonstrated stimulus class development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100080,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(86)90005-4","citationCount":"92","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedures: Sample classification versus comparison classification\",\"authors\":\"Joseph E. Spradlin,&nbsp;Richard R. Saunders\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0270-4684(86)90005-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Four experiments were conducted to investigate the development of stimulus classes using matching-to-sample procedures. The first three experiments involved teaching subjects to select four different comparison stimuli in response to a single sample stimulus. In the fourth experiment, the subjects were taught to select a single comparison stimulus in response to four different sample stimuli. Only one of the six subjects who received single-sample, multiple-comparison training demonstrated stimulus class development. All three subjects who were given training in selecting a single comparison stimulus in response to multiple samples demonstrated stimulus class development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(86)90005-4\",\"citationCount\":\"92\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468486900054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468486900054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

摘要

采用配对样本的方法,进行了四个实验来研究刺激类别的发展。前三个实验包括教受试者选择四种不同的比较刺激来回应单一的样本刺激。在第四个实验中,受试者被教导在四个不同的样本刺激中选择一个比较刺激。在接受单样本、多重比较训练的6名受试者中,只有1人表现出刺激类发展。在对多个样本进行选择单一比较刺激的训练后,三名被试均表现出刺激类别的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedures: Sample classification versus comparison classification

Four experiments were conducted to investigate the development of stimulus classes using matching-to-sample procedures. The first three experiments involved teaching subjects to select four different comparison stimuli in response to a single sample stimulus. In the fourth experiment, the subjects were taught to select a single comparison stimulus in response to four different sample stimuli. Only one of the six subjects who received single-sample, multiple-comparison training demonstrated stimulus class development. All three subjects who were given training in selecting a single comparison stimulus in response to multiple samples demonstrated stimulus class development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preface Control by exclusion in arbitrary matching-to-sample Stimulus control of eye orientations: Shaping S+ only versus shaping S- only An equivalence model for vocabulary acquisition in profoundly hearing-impaired children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1