针对P2P网络借贷中的贷款分配策略,提出了一种新的贷款推荐框架

Yuting Rong, Shangjie Liu, Shuo Yan, Wei Huang, Yanxia Chen
{"title":"针对P2P网络借贷中的贷款分配策略,提出了一种新的贷款推荐框架","authors":"Yuting Rong, Shangjie Liu, Shuo Yan, Wei Huang, Yanxia Chen","doi":"10.1108/imds-07-2022-0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeLenders in online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms are always non-experts and face severe information asymmetry. This paper aims to achieve the goals of gaining high returns with risk limitations or lowering risks with expected returns for P2P lenders.Design/methodology/approachThis paper used data from a leading online P2P lending platform in America. First, the authors constructed a logistic regression-based credit scoring model and a linear regression-based profit scoring model to predict the default probabilities and profitability of loans. Second, based on the predictions of loan risk and loan return, the authors constructed linear programming model to form the optimal loan portfolio for lenders.FindingsThe research results show that compared to a logistic regression-based credit scoring method, the proposed new framework could make more returns for lenders with risks unchanged. Furthermore, compared to a linear regression-based profit scoring method, the proposed new framework could lower risks for lenders without lowering returns. In addition, comparisons with advanced machine learning techniques further validate its superiority.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies that focus solely on predicting the default probability or profitability of loans, this study considers loan allocation in online P2P lending as an optimization research problem using a new framework based upon modern portfolio theory (MPT). This study may contribute theoretically to the extension of MPT in the specific context of online P2P lending and benefit lenders and platforms to develop more efficient investment tools.","PeriodicalId":13427,"journal":{"name":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","volume":"30 1","pages":"910-930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposing a new loan recommendation framework for loan allocation strategies in online P2P lending\",\"authors\":\"Yuting Rong, Shangjie Liu, Shuo Yan, Wei Huang, Yanxia Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/imds-07-2022-0399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeLenders in online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms are always non-experts and face severe information asymmetry. This paper aims to achieve the goals of gaining high returns with risk limitations or lowering risks with expected returns for P2P lenders.Design/methodology/approachThis paper used data from a leading online P2P lending platform in America. First, the authors constructed a logistic regression-based credit scoring model and a linear regression-based profit scoring model to predict the default probabilities and profitability of loans. Second, based on the predictions of loan risk and loan return, the authors constructed linear programming model to form the optimal loan portfolio for lenders.FindingsThe research results show that compared to a logistic regression-based credit scoring method, the proposed new framework could make more returns for lenders with risks unchanged. Furthermore, compared to a linear regression-based profit scoring method, the proposed new framework could lower risks for lenders without lowering returns. In addition, comparisons with advanced machine learning techniques further validate its superiority.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies that focus solely on predicting the default probability or profitability of loans, this study considers loan allocation in online P2P lending as an optimization research problem using a new framework based upon modern portfolio theory (MPT). This study may contribute theoretically to the extension of MPT in the specific context of online P2P lending and benefit lenders and platforms to develop more efficient investment tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"910-930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-07-2022-0399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-07-2022-0399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的P2P网络借贷平台的出借人往往是非专家,面临着严重的信息不对称。本文旨在实现P2P借贷人在风险限制下获得高收益或在预期收益下降低风险的目标。设计/方法/方法本文使用的数据来自美国一家领先的P2P网络借贷平台。首先,构建了基于logistic回归的信用评分模型和基于线性回归的盈利评分模型来预测贷款的违约概率和盈利能力。其次,在对贷款风险和收益进行预测的基础上,构建线性规划模型,形成贷款人的最优贷款组合。研究结果表明,与基于逻辑回归的信用评分方法相比,新框架可以在风险不变的情况下为贷款人带来更高的回报。此外,与基于线性回归的利润评分方法相比,提出的新框架可以在不降低回报的情况下降低贷款人的风险。此外,与先进的机器学习技术的比较进一步验证了其优越性。独创性/价值不同于以往的研究仅仅关注于预测贷款的违约概率或盈利能力,本研究使用基于现代投资组合理论(MPT)的新框架,将P2P网络借贷中的贷款分配作为一个优化研究问题。本研究可为MPT在网络P2P借贷特定背景下的推广提供理论依据,并有利于贷款人和平台开发更高效的投资工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proposing a new loan recommendation framework for loan allocation strategies in online P2P lending
PurposeLenders in online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms are always non-experts and face severe information asymmetry. This paper aims to achieve the goals of gaining high returns with risk limitations or lowering risks with expected returns for P2P lenders.Design/methodology/approachThis paper used data from a leading online P2P lending platform in America. First, the authors constructed a logistic regression-based credit scoring model and a linear regression-based profit scoring model to predict the default probabilities and profitability of loans. Second, based on the predictions of loan risk and loan return, the authors constructed linear programming model to form the optimal loan portfolio for lenders.FindingsThe research results show that compared to a logistic regression-based credit scoring method, the proposed new framework could make more returns for lenders with risks unchanged. Furthermore, compared to a linear regression-based profit scoring method, the proposed new framework could lower risks for lenders without lowering returns. In addition, comparisons with advanced machine learning techniques further validate its superiority.Originality/valueUnlike previous studies that focus solely on predicting the default probability or profitability of loans, this study considers loan allocation in online P2P lending as an optimization research problem using a new framework based upon modern portfolio theory (MPT). This study may contribute theoretically to the extension of MPT in the specific context of online P2P lending and benefit lenders and platforms to develop more efficient investment tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big data analytics capability in building supply chain resilience: the moderating effect of innovation-focused complementary assets Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on customer behavior in live streaming: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment How doctor image features engage health science short video viewers? Investigating the age and gender bias The impact of enterprise social media usage on employee creativity: a self-regulation perspective Implementation of information and communication technologies in fruit and vegetable supply chain: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1