欧洲上市公司零杠杆现象:融资决策还是金融市场强加?

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Brq-Business Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI:10.1177/23409444211024653
Flávio Morais, Zélia Serrasqueiro, Joaquim J. S. Ramalho
{"title":"欧洲上市公司零杠杆现象:融资决策还是金融市场强加?","authors":"Flávio Morais, Zélia Serrasqueiro, Joaquim J. S. Ramalho","doi":"10.1177/23409444211024653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides empirical evidence on the zero-leverage phenomenon for a sample of European listed firms for the period 1995–2016. It is shown that there are two types of firms with zero leverage: the financially constrained firms that face obstacles in obtaining external finance, as predicted by the financial constraints hypothesis; and the financially unconstrained firms that maintain zero leverage as a consequence of a financing decision, which supports the financial flexibility hypothesis. The zero-leverage phenomenon is also influenced by the financial system that prevails in each country, being boosted (inhibited) in market-based (bank-based) financial systems, and by the country’s macroeconomic conditions, with the recent financial and sovereign debt crises increasing the propensity for zero leverage in market-based countries. We also find that the financial flexibility hypothesis seems to be more important in market-based systems and that the financial constraints approach did not gain importance during the crisis period. Our results are robust to the use of alternative measures of debt conservatism, explanatory variables, and econometric methods and maintain their validity when we allow for endogeneity in firm size and dividend payments. JEL CLASSIFICATION G32","PeriodicalId":46891,"journal":{"name":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The zero-leverage phenomenon in European listed firms: A financing decision or an imposition of the financial market?\",\"authors\":\"Flávio Morais, Zélia Serrasqueiro, Joaquim J. S. Ramalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23409444211024653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides empirical evidence on the zero-leverage phenomenon for a sample of European listed firms for the period 1995–2016. It is shown that there are two types of firms with zero leverage: the financially constrained firms that face obstacles in obtaining external finance, as predicted by the financial constraints hypothesis; and the financially unconstrained firms that maintain zero leverage as a consequence of a financing decision, which supports the financial flexibility hypothesis. The zero-leverage phenomenon is also influenced by the financial system that prevails in each country, being boosted (inhibited) in market-based (bank-based) financial systems, and by the country’s macroeconomic conditions, with the recent financial and sovereign debt crises increasing the propensity for zero leverage in market-based countries. We also find that the financial flexibility hypothesis seems to be more important in market-based systems and that the financial constraints approach did not gain importance during the crisis period. Our results are robust to the use of alternative measures of debt conservatism, explanatory variables, and econometric methods and maintain their validity when we allow for endogeneity in firm size and dividend payments. JEL CLASSIFICATION G32\",\"PeriodicalId\":46891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brq-Business Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brq-Business Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211024653\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211024653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文以1995-2016年欧洲上市公司为样本,对零杠杆现象进行了实证研究。研究表明,存在两种类型的零杠杆企业:一种是财务约束企业,根据财务约束假设,它们在获得外部融资方面面临障碍;财务上不受约束的公司维持零杠杆作为融资决策的结果,这支持了财务灵活性假设。零杠杆现象还受到各国普遍存在的金融体系的影响,在以市场为基础(以银行为基础)的金融体系中受到促进(抑制),并受到该国宏观经济状况的影响,最近的金融危机和主权债务危机增加了以市场为基础的国家的零杠杆倾向。我们还发现,金融灵活性假设似乎在市场体系中更为重要,而金融约束方法在危机时期没有得到重视。我们的结果对于使用债务稳健性、解释变量和计量经济学方法的替代措施是稳健的,并且在考虑公司规模和股息支付的内生性时保持其有效性。凝胶分类g32
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The zero-leverage phenomenon in European listed firms: A financing decision or an imposition of the financial market?
This article provides empirical evidence on the zero-leverage phenomenon for a sample of European listed firms for the period 1995–2016. It is shown that there are two types of firms with zero leverage: the financially constrained firms that face obstacles in obtaining external finance, as predicted by the financial constraints hypothesis; and the financially unconstrained firms that maintain zero leverage as a consequence of a financing decision, which supports the financial flexibility hypothesis. The zero-leverage phenomenon is also influenced by the financial system that prevails in each country, being boosted (inhibited) in market-based (bank-based) financial systems, and by the country’s macroeconomic conditions, with the recent financial and sovereign debt crises increasing the propensity for zero leverage in market-based countries. We also find that the financial flexibility hypothesis seems to be more important in market-based systems and that the financial constraints approach did not gain importance during the crisis period. Our results are robust to the use of alternative measures of debt conservatism, explanatory variables, and econometric methods and maintain their validity when we allow for endogeneity in firm size and dividend payments. JEL CLASSIFICATION G32
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Strategic supplier performance in a competitive landscape: Enhancing organizational performance through lean supply chain management Leading a post-pandemic workforce: Understanding employees’ changing work ethic How to improve quality investing Uncertainty’s impact on adaptive performance in the post-COVID era: The moderating role of perceived leader’s effectiveness Strategy-making: The use and misuse of artifacts to achieve common understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1