评估深度学习模型在缺医少药人群中原发性开角型青光眼诊断中的漏诊和过度诊断偏差

Mingquan Lin, Yuyun Xiao, Bojian Hou, Tingyi Wanyan, M. Sharma, Zhangyang Wang, Fei Wang, S. V. Tassel, Yifan Peng
{"title":"评估深度学习模型在缺医少药人群中原发性开角型青光眼诊断中的漏诊和过度诊断偏差","authors":"Mingquan Lin, Yuyun Xiao, Bojian Hou, Tingyi Wanyan, M. Sharma, Zhangyang Wang, Fei Wang, S. V. Tassel, Yifan Peng","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2301.11315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the leading cause of blindness, especially among African American and Hispanic individuals. Deep learning has been widely used to detect POAG using fundus images as its performance is comparable to or even surpasses diagnosis by clinicians. However, human bias in clinical diagnosis may be reflected and amplified in the widely-used deep learning models, thus impacting their performance. Biases may cause (1) underdiagnosis, increasing the risks of delayed or inadequate treatment, and (2) overdiagnosis, which may increase individuals' stress, fear, well-being, and unnecessary/costly treatment. In this study, we examined the underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis when applying deep learning in POAG detection based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) from 22 centers across 16 states in the United States. Our results show that the widely-used deep learning model can underdiagnose or overdiagnose under-served populations. The most underdiagnosed group is female younger (< 60 yrs) group, and the most overdiagnosed group is Black older (≥ 60 yrs) group. Biased diagnosis through traditional deep learning methods may delay disease detection, treatment and create burdens among under-served populations, thereby, raising ethical concerns about using deep learning models in ophthalmology clinics.","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluate underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis bias of deep learning model on primary open-angle glaucoma diagnosis in under-served patient populations\",\"authors\":\"Mingquan Lin, Yuyun Xiao, Bojian Hou, Tingyi Wanyan, M. Sharma, Zhangyang Wang, Fei Wang, S. V. Tassel, Yifan Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2301.11315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the leading cause of blindness, especially among African American and Hispanic individuals. Deep learning has been widely used to detect POAG using fundus images as its performance is comparable to or even surpasses diagnosis by clinicians. However, human bias in clinical diagnosis may be reflected and amplified in the widely-used deep learning models, thus impacting their performance. Biases may cause (1) underdiagnosis, increasing the risks of delayed or inadequate treatment, and (2) overdiagnosis, which may increase individuals' stress, fear, well-being, and unnecessary/costly treatment. In this study, we examined the underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis when applying deep learning in POAG detection based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) from 22 centers across 16 states in the United States. Our results show that the widely-used deep learning model can underdiagnose or overdiagnose under-served populations. The most underdiagnosed group is female younger (< 60 yrs) group, and the most overdiagnosed group is Black older (≥ 60 yrs) group. Biased diagnosis through traditional deep learning methods may delay disease detection, treatment and create burdens among under-served populations, thereby, raising ethical concerns about using deep learning models in ophthalmology clinics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.11315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.11315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在美国,原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)是致盲的主要原因,尤其是在非洲裔美国人和西班牙裔美国人中。深度学习已被广泛用于使用眼底图像检测POAG,因为其性能可与临床医生的诊断相媲美甚至超过临床医生的诊断。然而,临床诊断中的人为偏见可能会在广泛使用的深度学习模型中得到反映和放大,从而影响其性能。偏见可能导致(1)诊断不足,增加延迟或不充分治疗的风险;(2)过度诊断,这可能增加个人的压力、恐惧、幸福感和不必要/昂贵的治疗。在这项研究中,我们基于美国16个州22个中心的高眼压治疗研究(OHTS),研究了深度学习在POAG检测中的诊断不足和过度诊断。我们的研究结果表明,广泛使用的深度学习模型可能会对服务不足的人群诊断不足或过度诊断。漏诊率最高的是女性青年(< 60岁)组,漏诊率最高的是黑人老年(≥60岁)组。通过传统的深度学习方法进行的有偏见的诊断可能会延迟疾病的检测和治疗,并给服务不足的人群带来负担,从而引发了在眼科诊所使用深度学习模型的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluate underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis bias of deep learning model on primary open-angle glaucoma diagnosis in under-served patient populations
In the United States, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the leading cause of blindness, especially among African American and Hispanic individuals. Deep learning has been widely used to detect POAG using fundus images as its performance is comparable to or even surpasses diagnosis by clinicians. However, human bias in clinical diagnosis may be reflected and amplified in the widely-used deep learning models, thus impacting their performance. Biases may cause (1) underdiagnosis, increasing the risks of delayed or inadequate treatment, and (2) overdiagnosis, which may increase individuals' stress, fear, well-being, and unnecessary/costly treatment. In this study, we examined the underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis when applying deep learning in POAG detection based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) from 22 centers across 16 states in the United States. Our results show that the widely-used deep learning model can underdiagnose or overdiagnose under-served populations. The most underdiagnosed group is female younger (< 60 yrs) group, and the most overdiagnosed group is Black older (≥ 60 yrs) group. Biased diagnosis through traditional deep learning methods may delay disease detection, treatment and create burdens among under-served populations, thereby, raising ethical concerns about using deep learning models in ophthalmology clinics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clarifying Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Genetic Associations Observed in Biobanks via Mediation Analysis of Smoking. CLASSify: A Web-Based Tool for Machine Learning. Clinical Note Structural Knowledge Improves Word Sense Disambiguation. Cluster Analysis of Cortical Amyloid Burden for Identifying Imaging-driven Subtypes in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Comparative Analysis of Fusion Strategies for Imaging and Non-imaging Data - Use-case of Hospital Discharge Prediction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1