COVID-19大流行期间非肌性浸润性膀胱癌的延迟膀胱镜随访可能增加复发率,但不会增加进展率

Yavuz Baştuğ, A. Çolakerol
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间非肌性浸润性膀胱癌的延迟膀胱镜随访可能增加复发率,但不会增加进展率","authors":"Yavuz Baştuğ, A. Çolakerol","doi":"10.46310/tjim.1345635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objektive: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in terms of recurrence and progression rate before and after the pandemic in patients who applied for bladder cancer and / or were followed-up-treatment-operated in the urology clinic during the pandemic. \nMethod: A total of 116 NMIBC patients with delayed cystoscopy and 90 control patients with timely cystoscopy were included in the study between June and July 2020. Demographic data of the patients were recorded. Recurrences and progression scores were calculated and grouped according to these scores. Cystoscopy delay time was calculated as the time from the planned cystoscopy time to the performed cystoscopy time. Recurrence and progression status of the patients were recorded and a comparison was made between the two groups. \nResults: The median age was 63.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 35–85) in delayed cystoscopy group and 67.3 (25-87) in control group. In the delayed cystoscopy group, 29 (25%) patients had tumor recurrence on follow-up cystoscopy and 3 (10.34%) patients had tumor progression on subsequent TUR-BT. The mean cystoscopy delay time is 89.27±27.35 days. As a result of the chi-square analysis performed in the group with 10-17 recurrence points, a statistically significant relationship was found between the experimental and control groups (χ2=5.792; p=.016; p0.05). \nConclusion: In this study, we reported that superficial bladder cancers with low recurrence score can wait 3-6 months but delaying 3-6 months in cases with a recurrence score of 10 or more increases the recurrence rate.","PeriodicalId":23372,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"296 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delayed Cystoscopic Follow-up of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic may Increase Recurrence Rates but not Progression Rates\",\"authors\":\"Yavuz Baştuğ, A. Çolakerol\",\"doi\":\"10.46310/tjim.1345635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objektive: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in terms of recurrence and progression rate before and after the pandemic in patients who applied for bladder cancer and / or were followed-up-treatment-operated in the urology clinic during the pandemic. \\nMethod: A total of 116 NMIBC patients with delayed cystoscopy and 90 control patients with timely cystoscopy were included in the study between June and July 2020. Demographic data of the patients were recorded. Recurrences and progression scores were calculated and grouped according to these scores. Cystoscopy delay time was calculated as the time from the planned cystoscopy time to the performed cystoscopy time. Recurrence and progression status of the patients were recorded and a comparison was made between the two groups. \\nResults: The median age was 63.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 35–85) in delayed cystoscopy group and 67.3 (25-87) in control group. In the delayed cystoscopy group, 29 (25%) patients had tumor recurrence on follow-up cystoscopy and 3 (10.34%) patients had tumor progression on subsequent TUR-BT. The mean cystoscopy delay time is 89.27±27.35 days. As a result of the chi-square analysis performed in the group with 10-17 recurrence points, a statistically significant relationship was found between the experimental and control groups (χ2=5.792; p=.016; p0.05). \\nConclusion: In this study, we reported that superficial bladder cancers with low recurrence score can wait 3-6 months but delaying 3-6 months in cases with a recurrence score of 10 or more increases the recurrence rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"296 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1345635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46310/tjim.1345635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨大流行期间在泌尿外科门诊申请膀胱癌和/或接受随访治疗手术的患者在大流行前后的复发率和进展率是否存在差异。方法:选取2020年6 - 7月116例延迟膀胱镜检查的NMIBC患者和90例及时膀胱镜检查的对照患者。记录患者的人口统计资料。计算复发和进展评分,并根据这些评分进行分组。膀胱镜检查延迟时间计算为计划膀胱镜检查时间到实际膀胱镜检查时间的时间。记录两组患者的复发及进展情况,并进行比较。结果:延迟膀胱镜组患者中位年龄为63.6岁(四分位数范围[IQR] 35 ~ 85),对照组患者中位年龄为67.3岁(25 ~ 87)。在延迟膀胱镜组中,29例(25%)患者在随访膀胱镜检查中出现肿瘤复发,3例(10.34%)患者在随后的turt - bt中出现肿瘤进展。膀胱镜检查延迟时间平均为89.27±27.35天。对10-17个复发点组进行卡方分析,发现实验组与对照组之间有统计学意义(χ2=5.792;p = .016;p0.05)。结论:在本研究中,我们报道了低复发评分的浅表性膀胱癌可以等待3-6个月,而延迟3-6个月的复发评分为10或以上的病例则增加了复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delayed Cystoscopic Follow-up of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic may Increase Recurrence Rates but not Progression Rates
Objektive: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in terms of recurrence and progression rate before and after the pandemic in patients who applied for bladder cancer and / or were followed-up-treatment-operated in the urology clinic during the pandemic. Method: A total of 116 NMIBC patients with delayed cystoscopy and 90 control patients with timely cystoscopy were included in the study between June and July 2020. Demographic data of the patients were recorded. Recurrences and progression scores were calculated and grouped according to these scores. Cystoscopy delay time was calculated as the time from the planned cystoscopy time to the performed cystoscopy time. Recurrence and progression status of the patients were recorded and a comparison was made between the two groups. Results: The median age was 63.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 35–85) in delayed cystoscopy group and 67.3 (25-87) in control group. In the delayed cystoscopy group, 29 (25%) patients had tumor recurrence on follow-up cystoscopy and 3 (10.34%) patients had tumor progression on subsequent TUR-BT. The mean cystoscopy delay time is 89.27±27.35 days. As a result of the chi-square analysis performed in the group with 10-17 recurrence points, a statistically significant relationship was found between the experimental and control groups (χ2=5.792; p=.016; p0.05). Conclusion: In this study, we reported that superficial bladder cancers with low recurrence score can wait 3-6 months but delaying 3-6 months in cases with a recurrence score of 10 or more increases the recurrence rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turkish Nephrology on the 100th Anniversary of the Republic Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Followed at the Intensive Care Unit after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (Fisher Grade IV) Surgery:A Retrospective Study Adrenal Cystic Lymphangioma with Radiological, Clinical and Histopathological Findings, Case report. An Unusual Cause of Bilateral Adrenal Incidentaloma: A Case Report of Primary Adrenal Lymphoma An underestimated old friend: Serum protein electrophoresis in the differential diagnosis of glomerulopathies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1