H. D. Koubodana, K. Atchonouglo, J. Adounkpe, E. Amoussou, Domiho Japhet Kodja, Dambré Koungbanane, Koba Yaovi Afoudji, Y. Lombo, K. Kpemoua
{"title":"西非Mono流域地表径流的ihaacres和GR4J集总模型预测与比较","authors":"H. D. Koubodana, K. Atchonouglo, J. Adounkpe, E. Amoussou, Domiho Japhet Kodja, Dambré Koungbanane, Koba Yaovi Afoudji, Y. Lombo, K. Kpemoua","doi":"10.5194/piahs-384-63-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study aims to assess simulated surface runoff before and after dam construction in the Mono catchment (West Africa) using two lumped models: GR4J (Rural Engineering with 4 Daily Parameters) and IHACRES (Identification of unit Hydrographs and Component flows from Rainfall, Evapotranspiration and Stream data) over two different periods (1964–1986\nand 1988–2010). Daily rainfall, mean temperature, evapotranspiration and\ndischarge in situ data were collected for the period 1964–2010. After the\nmodel's initialization, calibration and validation; performances analysis\nhave been carried out using multi-objectives functions developed in R software (version 3.5.3). The results indicate that statistical metrics such as the coefficient of determination (R2), the Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE), the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) and the Percent of Bias (PBIAS) provide satisfactory insights over the first period of simulation (1964–1986) and low performances over the second period of simulation (1988–2010). In particular, IHACRES model underestimates extreme high runoff of Mono catchment between 1964 and 1986. Conversely, GR4J model overestimates extreme high runoff and has been found to be better for runoff prediction of the river only between 1964 and 1986. Moreover, the study deduced that the robustness of runoff simulation between 1964 and 1986 is better than between 1988 and 2010. Therefore, the weakness of simulated runoff between 1988 and 2010 was certainly due to dam management in the catchment. The study suggests that land cover changes impacts, soil proprieties and climate may also affect surface runoff in the catchment.\n","PeriodicalId":53381,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface runoff prediction and comparison using IHACRES and GR4J lumped models in the Mono catchment, West Africa\",\"authors\":\"H. D. Koubodana, K. Atchonouglo, J. Adounkpe, E. Amoussou, Domiho Japhet Kodja, Dambré Koungbanane, Koba Yaovi Afoudji, Y. Lombo, K. Kpemoua\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/piahs-384-63-2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. This study aims to assess simulated surface runoff before and after dam construction in the Mono catchment (West Africa) using two lumped models: GR4J (Rural Engineering with 4 Daily Parameters) and IHACRES (Identification of unit Hydrographs and Component flows from Rainfall, Evapotranspiration and Stream data) over two different periods (1964–1986\\nand 1988–2010). Daily rainfall, mean temperature, evapotranspiration and\\ndischarge in situ data were collected for the period 1964–2010. After the\\nmodel's initialization, calibration and validation; performances analysis\\nhave been carried out using multi-objectives functions developed in R software (version 3.5.3). The results indicate that statistical metrics such as the coefficient of determination (R2), the Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE), the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) and the Percent of Bias (PBIAS) provide satisfactory insights over the first period of simulation (1964–1986) and low performances over the second period of simulation (1988–2010). In particular, IHACRES model underestimates extreme high runoff of Mono catchment between 1964 and 1986. Conversely, GR4J model overestimates extreme high runoff and has been found to be better for runoff prediction of the river only between 1964 and 1986. Moreover, the study deduced that the robustness of runoff simulation between 1964 and 1986 is better than between 1988 and 2010. Therefore, the weakness of simulated runoff between 1988 and 2010 was certainly due to dam management in the catchment. The study suggests that land cover changes impacts, soil proprieties and climate may also affect surface runoff in the catchment.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-384-63-2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-384-63-2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surface runoff prediction and comparison using IHACRES and GR4J lumped models in the Mono catchment, West Africa
Abstract. This study aims to assess simulated surface runoff before and after dam construction in the Mono catchment (West Africa) using two lumped models: GR4J (Rural Engineering with 4 Daily Parameters) and IHACRES (Identification of unit Hydrographs and Component flows from Rainfall, Evapotranspiration and Stream data) over two different periods (1964–1986
and 1988–2010). Daily rainfall, mean temperature, evapotranspiration and
discharge in situ data were collected for the period 1964–2010. After the
model's initialization, calibration and validation; performances analysis
have been carried out using multi-objectives functions developed in R software (version 3.5.3). The results indicate that statistical metrics such as the coefficient of determination (R2), the Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE), the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) and the Percent of Bias (PBIAS) provide satisfactory insights over the first period of simulation (1964–1986) and low performances over the second period of simulation (1988–2010). In particular, IHACRES model underestimates extreme high runoff of Mono catchment between 1964 and 1986. Conversely, GR4J model overestimates extreme high runoff and has been found to be better for runoff prediction of the river only between 1964 and 1986. Moreover, the study deduced that the robustness of runoff simulation between 1964 and 1986 is better than between 1988 and 2010. Therefore, the weakness of simulated runoff between 1988 and 2010 was certainly due to dam management in the catchment. The study suggests that land cover changes impacts, soil proprieties and climate may also affect surface runoff in the catchment.