概率命题时间逻辑

Q4 Mathematics 信息与控制 Pub Date : 1986-08-01 DOI:10.1016/S0019-9958(86)80001-8
Sergiu Hart, Micha Sharir
{"title":"概率命题时间逻辑","authors":"Sergiu Hart,&nbsp;Micha Sharir","doi":"10.1016/S0019-9958(86)80001-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present two (closely-related) propositional probabilistic temporal logics based on temporal logics of branching time as introduced by Ben-Ari, Pnueli, and Manna (<em>Acta Inform.</em> <strong>20</strong> (1983), 207–226), Emerson and Halpern (“Proceedings, 14th ACM Sympos. Theory of Comput.,” 1982, pp. 169–179, and Emerson and Clarke (<em>Sci. Comput. Program.</em> <strong>2</strong> (1982), 241–266). The first logic, <em>PTL<sub>f</sub></em>, is interpreted over finite models, while the second logic, <em>PTL<sub>b</sub></em>, which is an extension of the first one, is interpreted over infinite models with transition probabilities bounded away from 0. The logic <em>PTL<sub>f</sub></em> allows us to reason about finite-state sequential probabilistic programs, and the logic <em>PTL<sub>b</sub></em> allows us to reason about (finite-state) concurrent probabilistic programs, without any explicit reference to the actual values of their state-transition probabilities. A generalization of the tableau method yields deterministic single-exponential time decision procedures for our logics, and complete axiomatizations of them are given. Several meta-results, including the absence of a finite-model property for <em>PTL<sub>b</sub></em>, and the connection between satisfiable formulae of <em>PTL<sub>b</sub></em> and finite state concurrent probabilistic programs, are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38164,"journal":{"name":"信息与控制","volume":"70 2","pages":"Pages 97-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0019-9958(86)80001-8","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic propositional temporal logics\",\"authors\":\"Sergiu Hart,&nbsp;Micha Sharir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0019-9958(86)80001-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present two (closely-related) propositional probabilistic temporal logics based on temporal logics of branching time as introduced by Ben-Ari, Pnueli, and Manna (<em>Acta Inform.</em> <strong>20</strong> (1983), 207–226), Emerson and Halpern (“Proceedings, 14th ACM Sympos. Theory of Comput.,” 1982, pp. 169–179, and Emerson and Clarke (<em>Sci. Comput. Program.</em> <strong>2</strong> (1982), 241–266). The first logic, <em>PTL<sub>f</sub></em>, is interpreted over finite models, while the second logic, <em>PTL<sub>b</sub></em>, which is an extension of the first one, is interpreted over infinite models with transition probabilities bounded away from 0. The logic <em>PTL<sub>f</sub></em> allows us to reason about finite-state sequential probabilistic programs, and the logic <em>PTL<sub>b</sub></em> allows us to reason about (finite-state) concurrent probabilistic programs, without any explicit reference to the actual values of their state-transition probabilities. A generalization of the tableau method yields deterministic single-exponential time decision procedures for our logics, and complete axiomatizations of them are given. Several meta-results, including the absence of a finite-model property for <em>PTL<sub>b</sub></em>, and the connection between satisfiable formulae of <em>PTL<sub>b</sub></em> and finite state concurrent probabilistic programs, are also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"信息与控制\",\"volume\":\"70 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 97-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0019-9958(86)80001-8\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"信息与控制\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019995886800018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"信息与控制","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019995886800018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

我们提出了两个(密切相关的)基于分支时间时间逻辑的命题概率时间逻辑,这是由Ben-Ari, Pnueli和Manna (Acta Inform. 20 (1983), 207-226), Emerson和Halpern(“Proceedings,第14届ACM研讨会”)介绍的。《计算机理论》, 1982年,第169-179页,爱默生和克拉克(Sci。第一版。程序2(1982),241-266)。第一个逻辑,PTLf,是在有限模型上解释的,而第二个逻辑,PTLb,是第一个逻辑的扩展,是在无限模型上解释的,转移概率有界远离0。逻辑PTLf允许我们对有限状态顺序概率程序进行推理,逻辑PTLb允许我们对(有限状态)并发概率程序进行推理,而无需显式引用其状态转移概率的实际值。对表法的推广,给出了确定的单指数时间决策过程,并给出了它们的完全公理化。讨论了PTLb的有限模型性质的不存在性,以及PTLb的可满足公式与有限状态并发概率规划之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Probabilistic propositional temporal logics

We present two (closely-related) propositional probabilistic temporal logics based on temporal logics of branching time as introduced by Ben-Ari, Pnueli, and Manna (Acta Inform. 20 (1983), 207–226), Emerson and Halpern (“Proceedings, 14th ACM Sympos. Theory of Comput.,” 1982, pp. 169–179, and Emerson and Clarke (Sci. Comput. Program. 2 (1982), 241–266). The first logic, PTLf, is interpreted over finite models, while the second logic, PTLb, which is an extension of the first one, is interpreted over infinite models with transition probabilities bounded away from 0. The logic PTLf allows us to reason about finite-state sequential probabilistic programs, and the logic PTLb allows us to reason about (finite-state) concurrent probabilistic programs, without any explicit reference to the actual values of their state-transition probabilities. A generalization of the tableau method yields deterministic single-exponential time decision procedures for our logics, and complete axiomatizations of them are given. Several meta-results, including the absence of a finite-model property for PTLb, and the connection between satisfiable formulae of PTLb and finite state concurrent probabilistic programs, are also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
信息与控制
信息与控制 Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4623
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Systolic trellis automata: Stability, decidability and complexity On relativized exponential and probabilistic complexity classes A note on succinct representations of graphs Function definitions in term rewriting and applicative programming Simulation of large networks on smaller networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1