亲水丙烯酸人工晶状体术后晚期混浊。

Hakan E Oner, I. Durak, O. Saatçi
{"title":"亲水丙烯酸人工晶状体术后晚期混浊。","authors":"Hakan E Oner, I. Durak, O. Saatçi","doi":"10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate the incidence of postoperative opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and discuss the surgical management.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nSeventy-two eyes of 72 consecutive patients who received the same type of hydrophilic acrylic IOL (Intraocular Optical International, I.O.I., California, USA) after uneventful phacoemulsification were evaluated retrospectively. Systemic status, follow-up time, recognition time of IOL opacification, time lapse between implantation and explantation, and surgical technique during explantation were reported.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIOL opacification was noted in 3 patients (4.1%). Time lapse between implantation and first recognition of opacification was 6.3+/-1.5 months (range: 5-8 months). Two of the patients had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and both were on renal dialysis for diabetic nephropathy, whereas one had no systemic disease. Opacified hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were exchanged with Acrysof IOL, and no further opacification occurred after lens exchange.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nUse caution on implantation of hydrophilic IOLs because late opacification is a serious complication requiring further surgery.","PeriodicalId":19509,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","volume":"12 1","pages":"304-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late postoperative opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Hakan E Oner, I. Durak, O. Saatçi\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\\nTo evaluate the incidence of postoperative opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and discuss the surgical management.\\n\\n\\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\\nSeventy-two eyes of 72 consecutive patients who received the same type of hydrophilic acrylic IOL (Intraocular Optical International, I.O.I., California, USA) after uneventful phacoemulsification were evaluated retrospectively. Systemic status, follow-up time, recognition time of IOL opacification, time lapse between implantation and explantation, and surgical technique during explantation were reported.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nIOL opacification was noted in 3 patients (4.1%). Time lapse between implantation and first recognition of opacification was 6.3+/-1.5 months (range: 5-8 months). Two of the patients had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and both were on renal dialysis for diabetic nephropathy, whereas one had no systemic disease. Opacified hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were exchanged with Acrysof IOL, and no further opacification occurred after lens exchange.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nUse caution on implantation of hydrophilic IOLs because late opacification is a serious complication requiring further surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"304-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

背景与目的评价亲水丙烯酸人工晶状体术后混浊的发生率并探讨手术处理方法。患者与方法回顾性评价72例连续72只眼的超声乳化术后接受同一类型亲水性丙烯酸人工晶状体(Intraocular Optical International, i.o.i., California, USA)的患者。报告了系统状态、随访时间、人工晶状体混浊的识别时间、人工晶状体植入术和人工晶状体植入术之间的时间间隔以及人工晶状体植入术的手术技术。结果ol混浊3例(4.1%)。从植入到首次发现混浊的时间间隔为6.3+/-1.5个月(范围:5-8个月)。其中两名患者患有胰岛素依赖型糖尿病,两名患者都因糖尿病肾病而接受肾透析,而一名患者没有全身性疾病。将混浊的亲水丙烯酸人工晶状体与Acrysof人工晶状体置换后无混浊现象发生。结论:晚期混浊是严重的并发症,需进一步手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Late postoperative opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incidence of postoperative opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and discuss the surgical management. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-two eyes of 72 consecutive patients who received the same type of hydrophilic acrylic IOL (Intraocular Optical International, I.O.I., California, USA) after uneventful phacoemulsification were evaluated retrospectively. Systemic status, follow-up time, recognition time of IOL opacification, time lapse between implantation and explantation, and surgical technique during explantation were reported. RESULTS IOL opacification was noted in 3 patients (4.1%). Time lapse between implantation and first recognition of opacification was 6.3+/-1.5 months (range: 5-8 months). Two of the patients had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and both were on renal dialysis for diabetic nephropathy, whereas one had no systemic disease. Opacified hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were exchanged with Acrysof IOL, and no further opacification occurred after lens exchange. CONCLUSION Use caution on implantation of hydrophilic IOLs because late opacification is a serious complication requiring further surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Improving Outcomes for Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Acute Visual Loss Secondary to Sneezing Concurrent Keratitis and Endophthalmitis Associated With Topical Medications Contaminated by Serratia Marcescens Donor Lenticule Centration for Trephination in DSAEK Welcome to OSLI Retina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1