基于数据融合新距离的证据主体间冲突程度分析

IF 0.5 Q4 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis Pub Date : 2021-04-07 DOI:10.1142/S2424922X21500042
Myongnam Jong, Yun-Ji Paek, Hyonil Kim, Cholsok Yu
{"title":"基于数据融合新距离的证据主体间冲突程度分析","authors":"Myongnam Jong, Yun-Ji Paek, Hyonil Kim, Cholsok Yu","doi":"10.1142/S2424922X21500042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dempster’s combination rule may produce some unreasonable results when dealing with a combination of the conflicting evidence in evidence theory of Dempster–Shafer. Therefore, analyzing the degree of conflict between the bodies of evidence is essential to evaluate the applicability of Dempster’s rule. A new probability function, which is called a supporting probability function, is proposed to describe the correlation between evidences, and its distance is proposed to measure the distance between bodies of evidence. Combining this distance with classical conflict coefficient, a new method of evaluating the applicability of classical Dempster’s combination rule is presented. A weighted average approach to combine the conflicting evidences based on a supporting probability distance between the bodies of evidence is proposed. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the interest of the proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":47145,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis","volume":"89 1","pages":"2150004:1-2150004:17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the degree of conflict between bodies of evidence based on a new distance in data fusion\",\"authors\":\"Myongnam Jong, Yun-Ji Paek, Hyonil Kim, Cholsok Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424922X21500042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dempster’s combination rule may produce some unreasonable results when dealing with a combination of the conflicting evidence in evidence theory of Dempster–Shafer. Therefore, analyzing the degree of conflict between the bodies of evidence is essential to evaluate the applicability of Dempster’s rule. A new probability function, which is called a supporting probability function, is proposed to describe the correlation between evidences, and its distance is proposed to measure the distance between bodies of evidence. Combining this distance with classical conflict coefficient, a new method of evaluating the applicability of classical Dempster’s combination rule is presented. A weighted average approach to combine the conflicting evidences based on a supporting probability distance between the bodies of evidence is proposed. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the interest of the proposed approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"2150004:1-2150004:17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424922X21500042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424922X21500042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Dempster - shafer证据理论中,Dempster的组合规则在处理相互矛盾的证据组合时可能会产生一些不合理的结果。因此,分析证据主体之间的冲突程度是评价登普斯特规则适用性的必要条件。提出了一种新的概率函数,即支持概率函数来描述证据之间的相关性,并提出了支持概率函数的距离来度量证据体之间的距离。将此距离与经典冲突系数相结合,提出了一种评价经典Dempster组合规则适用性的新方法。提出了一种基于证据体之间的支持概率距离的加权平均方法来组合相互冲突的证据。数值算例说明了该方法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing the degree of conflict between bodies of evidence based on a new distance in data fusion
Dempster’s combination rule may produce some unreasonable results when dealing with a combination of the conflicting evidence in evidence theory of Dempster–Shafer. Therefore, analyzing the degree of conflict between the bodies of evidence is essential to evaluate the applicability of Dempster’s rule. A new probability function, which is called a supporting probability function, is proposed to describe the correlation between evidences, and its distance is proposed to measure the distance between bodies of evidence. Combining this distance with classical conflict coefficient, a new method of evaluating the applicability of classical Dempster’s combination rule is presented. A weighted average approach to combine the conflicting evidences based on a supporting probability distance between the bodies of evidence is proposed. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the interest of the proposed approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis
Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Assessment Of Mars Analog Habitation Plans Using Network Analysis Methodologies A Novel Genetic-Inspired Binary Firefly Algorithm for Feature Selection in the Prediction of Cervical Cancer Big Data Analytics for Predictive System Maintenance Using Machine Learning Models Data Mining for Estimating the Impact of Physical Activity Levels on the Health-Related Well-Being A Novel Autoencoder Deep Architecture for Detecting the Outlier in Heterogeneous Data Sets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1