会计的社会影响:它是否有成为一个大概念的风险,这重要吗?

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1108/QRAM-05-2021-0093
Cherrie Yang, S. O’Leary, Helen Tregidga
{"title":"会计的社会影响:它是否有成为一个大概念的风险,这重要吗?","authors":"Cherrie Yang, S. O’Leary, Helen Tregidga","doi":"10.1108/QRAM-05-2021-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn addition to introducing the papers that contribute to the special issue on “Accounting for Social Impact”, the purpose of this editorial is to prompt critical reflection and discussion on the concept of social impact in accounting research and practice.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis editorial draws on Alvesson and Blom’s (2021) hembig concept to frame the discussion. After briefly introducing the hembig concept, we discuss social impact in accounting research and practice in relation to it before reflecting on potential implications. We then introduce the contributions to this special issue.\n\n\nFindings\nWhile we argue that social impact in accounting is not a hembig concept, we suggest that it is potentially at risk of becoming one. In light of this discussion, we identify the importance of conceptual clarity in the use of social impact within accounting research and practice, given the potential for conceptual ambiguity.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe editorial aims, which are reflected in this special issue, are not only to stimulate qualitative research on accounting for social impact but to also encourage further critical engagement with the concept and its use. We suggest that the concept of social impact and its use within accounting research and practice would benefit from further conversations and critical reflection.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWe consider the concept of social impact within accounting in relation to the hembig concept.\n","PeriodicalId":46537,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social impact in accounting: is it at risk of becoming a hembig concept and does this matter?\",\"authors\":\"Cherrie Yang, S. O’Leary, Helen Tregidga\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/QRAM-05-2021-0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIn addition to introducing the papers that contribute to the special issue on “Accounting for Social Impact”, the purpose of this editorial is to prompt critical reflection and discussion on the concept of social impact in accounting research and practice.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis editorial draws on Alvesson and Blom’s (2021) hembig concept to frame the discussion. After briefly introducing the hembig concept, we discuss social impact in accounting research and practice in relation to it before reflecting on potential implications. We then introduce the contributions to this special issue.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nWhile we argue that social impact in accounting is not a hembig concept, we suggest that it is potentially at risk of becoming one. In light of this discussion, we identify the importance of conceptual clarity in the use of social impact within accounting research and practice, given the potential for conceptual ambiguity.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe editorial aims, which are reflected in this special issue, are not only to stimulate qualitative research on accounting for social impact but to also encourage further critical engagement with the concept and its use. We suggest that the concept of social impact and its use within accounting research and practice would benefit from further conversations and critical reflection.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nWe consider the concept of social impact within accounting in relation to the hembig concept.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-05-2021-0093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-05-2021-0093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

除了介绍为“会计的社会影响”特刊做出贡献的论文外,这篇社论的目的是促进对会计研究和实践中社会影响概念的批判性反思和讨论。设计/方法论/方法这篇社论借鉴了Alvesson和Blom(2021)的hembig概念来框架讨论。在简要介绍了hembig概念之后,我们讨论了与之相关的会计研究和实践中的社会影响,然后思考了潜在的影响。然后我们介绍对本期特刊的贡献。虽然我们认为会计的社会影响不是一个大的概念,但我们认为它有可能成为一个大的概念。鉴于这一讨论,考虑到概念歧义的可能性,我们确定了在会计研究和实践中使用社会影响时概念清晰度的重要性。研究局限/意义这篇社论的目的,反映在本期特刊中,不仅是为了刺激对社会影响会计的定性研究,而且还鼓励对这一概念及其使用的进一步批判性参与。我们建议,社会影响的概念及其在会计研究和实践中的应用将受益于进一步的对话和批判性反思。原创性/价值我们考虑会计中的社会影响概念与hembig概念的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social impact in accounting: is it at risk of becoming a hembig concept and does this matter?
Purpose In addition to introducing the papers that contribute to the special issue on “Accounting for Social Impact”, the purpose of this editorial is to prompt critical reflection and discussion on the concept of social impact in accounting research and practice. Design/methodology/approach This editorial draws on Alvesson and Blom’s (2021) hembig concept to frame the discussion. After briefly introducing the hembig concept, we discuss social impact in accounting research and practice in relation to it before reflecting on potential implications. We then introduce the contributions to this special issue. Findings While we argue that social impact in accounting is not a hembig concept, we suggest that it is potentially at risk of becoming one. In light of this discussion, we identify the importance of conceptual clarity in the use of social impact within accounting research and practice, given the potential for conceptual ambiguity. Research limitations/implications The editorial aims, which are reflected in this special issue, are not only to stimulate qualitative research on accounting for social impact but to also encourage further critical engagement with the concept and its use. We suggest that the concept of social impact and its use within accounting research and practice would benefit from further conversations and critical reflection. Originality/value We consider the concept of social impact within accounting in relation to the hembig concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
31.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management is an international journal that promotes qualitative research at the interface of accounting and management. The journal encourages the assessment of practices in the accounting field through a variety of theoretical lenses, and seeks to further our knowledge of the accounting-management nexus in its broadest (e.g., organisational, social and political) contexts. QRAM welcomes submissions of original research papers, conceptual pieces, substantive review articles, and shorter papers such as comments or research notes. The following is intended to indicate potential topics, but is by no means prescriptive. These topics can be overlapping rather than discrete subject areas, and researchers should not feel restricted by the scope of the topics listed below. • Management accounting and control • Accountability, transition and organisational change • Performance management and accounting metrics • Accounting for strategic management • The use and behavioural effects of accounting information in organisational decision-making • Public and third sector accounting and management • Accounting and management controls for sustainability and the environment • Historical perspectives on the accounting-management interface • Methods and methodologies for research at the interface of accounting and management • Accounting and management in developing countries and emerging economies • Technology effects on accounting-management dynamics
期刊最新文献
When ethnography meets scientific aspiration: a comparative exploration of ethnography in anthropology and accounting How accounting research understands performativity: effects and processes of a multi-faceted notion THE INFLUENCE OF JOB SATISFACTION, WORK MOTIVATION, AND EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF INTERNAL CONTROL AND FRAUD : A CASE STUDY ON GARUDA INDONESIA JOB PERFORMANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE IN SURABAYA: THE ROLE OF WORK ENVIRONMENT AND CAREER DEVELOPMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1