容忍与不挑战:护士的职场压迫

April Anne Domingo Balanon-Bocato
{"title":"容忍与不挑战:护士的职场压迫","authors":"April Anne Domingo Balanon-Bocato","doi":"10.4172/2167-1168.1000E137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea that nurses are an oppressed group was first suggested by Roberts in 1983. That the Nursing profession began at a time of patriarchy is something of importance to note. Through the years there has always been a power differential between doctors and nurses. A handful of articles and researches will support the fact that there is indeed a long standing culture of oppression in the nursing profession. Gordon [1], in her book nursing against the odds notes that nurses are viewed essentially as physician subordinates with no real autonomy. It is disturbing to realize that in the health care scenario, some people and some disciplines think that they are more important than others, with this way of thinking; the Dunning-Krueger effect comes to mind. According to this, people display illusory superiority and tend to judge themselves as better than others. Research by Rodwell and Demir in 2012 says that all of us are vulnerable to this decision because we all have pockets of incompetence we do not realize [2]. It isn't a question of ego blinding as to our weaknesses but psychologists have proven that people usually admit their deficits once they can spot them. Ironically, people who have a moderate amount of expertise often have less competence in their abilities; in short, they know enough to know that there is a lot they do not know. Some refer to this as the \"bubble of inadequate perception\". Further explained, when people are unskilled, they cannot see their own faults-but when they are exceptionally competent, they cannot perceive how unusual their abilities are. Knowing how competent we are and how our skills stack up against other people is more than just a self-esteem boost. It helps us, figure out where we can forge ahead on our own decisions and instincts and when we need to seek advice. But why is there so much self-silencing? If we truly believe that the days when nurses played the role of skilled handmaidens to physicians are in the past, then why do nurses allow their practice to be defined by the physicians they work with? Friere's [3] theory of oppression has been used in nursing literature to define the oppressed state of the nursing profession for years. Whether we would like to admit it or not, the culture of oppression in nursing is something prevailing. Perhaps from a time when the profession of nursing fell under a male dominated group of physicians, or from a time when nurses and doctors belonged to different herds and groups, a time when overt and covert behaviours were used to put people in their place. Researches by Dong and Temple in 2011 [4] have proven that the experience of oppression may result in violence as a way to achieve power over peers. Whenever there is a dominant group and an oppressed group, the dominant group exerts all its power on the oppressed group and because the oppressed group cannot exert their power upward, they unconsciously start attacking each other. Fletcher called this the submissive aggressive syndrome which in nursing has become a perpetuating cycle. How many times have we come across articles describing how “nurses eat their young” in a cycle of unbroken violence? Lateral violence should seem less likely in a field such as nursing where caring and compassion are cornerstones of the job. The shadow of oppression continues to bring with it reluctance to speak up with the fear of being handed powerful disincentives, or the fear of repercussions and drawing attention-causing nurses to hold back on information and insight. A change in behaviour and empowerment become an imperative in and among oppressed groups and in the culture of nursing environments. Like any antecedent to change, the attempt at shifting nurse’s attitudes may become the necessary starting point to do away with oppression. Nurses must stop devaluing themselves and push themselves to keep learning. Educators and philosophers have for many years encouraged the advancement of education as a mode of liberation by the oppressed. The more knowledgeable one becomes, the less likely one is to have invisible holes in one’s competence. It is high time that nurses start viewing themselves as important and vocally assert themselves as members of a multidisciplinary health team. While it is true that the medical and the nursing professions overlap to a significant extent, nursing is still an autonomous discipline that relies heavily on communication to ensure delivery of efficient care. And the only way to fulfil a nurse’s key ethical duty of patient advocacy is to work on espousing a more positive professional identity that would lead to an increase in unity and purpose and that could eventually break the cycle of oppression. Because what’s good for one of us is good for each of us, since we all have the right to a safe and supportive work environment and because workplace violence only gains legitimacy when it remains tolerated and unchallenged.","PeriodicalId":22775,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing care","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolerated and Unchallenged: Workplace Oppression among Nurses\",\"authors\":\"April Anne Domingo Balanon-Bocato\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-1168.1000E137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The idea that nurses are an oppressed group was first suggested by Roberts in 1983. That the Nursing profession began at a time of patriarchy is something of importance to note. Through the years there has always been a power differential between doctors and nurses. A handful of articles and researches will support the fact that there is indeed a long standing culture of oppression in the nursing profession. Gordon [1], in her book nursing against the odds notes that nurses are viewed essentially as physician subordinates with no real autonomy. It is disturbing to realize that in the health care scenario, some people and some disciplines think that they are more important than others, with this way of thinking; the Dunning-Krueger effect comes to mind. According to this, people display illusory superiority and tend to judge themselves as better than others. Research by Rodwell and Demir in 2012 says that all of us are vulnerable to this decision because we all have pockets of incompetence we do not realize [2]. It isn't a question of ego blinding as to our weaknesses but psychologists have proven that people usually admit their deficits once they can spot them. Ironically, people who have a moderate amount of expertise often have less competence in their abilities; in short, they know enough to know that there is a lot they do not know. Some refer to this as the \\\"bubble of inadequate perception\\\". Further explained, when people are unskilled, they cannot see their own faults-but when they are exceptionally competent, they cannot perceive how unusual their abilities are. Knowing how competent we are and how our skills stack up against other people is more than just a self-esteem boost. It helps us, figure out where we can forge ahead on our own decisions and instincts and when we need to seek advice. But why is there so much self-silencing? If we truly believe that the days when nurses played the role of skilled handmaidens to physicians are in the past, then why do nurses allow their practice to be defined by the physicians they work with? Friere's [3] theory of oppression has been used in nursing literature to define the oppressed state of the nursing profession for years. Whether we would like to admit it or not, the culture of oppression in nursing is something prevailing. Perhaps from a time when the profession of nursing fell under a male dominated group of physicians, or from a time when nurses and doctors belonged to different herds and groups, a time when overt and covert behaviours were used to put people in their place. Researches by Dong and Temple in 2011 [4] have proven that the experience of oppression may result in violence as a way to achieve power over peers. Whenever there is a dominant group and an oppressed group, the dominant group exerts all its power on the oppressed group and because the oppressed group cannot exert their power upward, they unconsciously start attacking each other. Fletcher called this the submissive aggressive syndrome which in nursing has become a perpetuating cycle. How many times have we come across articles describing how “nurses eat their young” in a cycle of unbroken violence? Lateral violence should seem less likely in a field such as nursing where caring and compassion are cornerstones of the job. The shadow of oppression continues to bring with it reluctance to speak up with the fear of being handed powerful disincentives, or the fear of repercussions and drawing attention-causing nurses to hold back on information and insight. A change in behaviour and empowerment become an imperative in and among oppressed groups and in the culture of nursing environments. Like any antecedent to change, the attempt at shifting nurse’s attitudes may become the necessary starting point to do away with oppression. Nurses must stop devaluing themselves and push themselves to keep learning. Educators and philosophers have for many years encouraged the advancement of education as a mode of liberation by the oppressed. The more knowledgeable one becomes, the less likely one is to have invisible holes in one’s competence. It is high time that nurses start viewing themselves as important and vocally assert themselves as members of a multidisciplinary health team. While it is true that the medical and the nursing professions overlap to a significant extent, nursing is still an autonomous discipline that relies heavily on communication to ensure delivery of efficient care. And the only way to fulfil a nurse’s key ethical duty of patient advocacy is to work on espousing a more positive professional identity that would lead to an increase in unity and purpose and that could eventually break the cycle of oppression. Because what’s good for one of us is good for each of us, since we all have the right to a safe and supportive work environment and because workplace violence only gains legitimacy when it remains tolerated and unchallenged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of nursing care\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of nursing care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000E137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000E137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

护士是一个受压迫群体的观点是罗伯茨在1983年首次提出的。值得注意的是,护理职业始于父权时代。多年来,医生和护士之间一直存在着权力差异。一些文章和研究将支持这样一个事实,即在护理职业中确实存在长期存在的压迫文化。Gordon[1]在她的书《护理逆境》中指出,护士基本上被视为医生的下属,没有真正的自主权。令人不安的是,在医疗保健场景中,一些人和一些学科认为他们比其他学科更重要,以这种思维方式;我想到了邓宁-克鲁格效应。据此,人们表现出虚幻的优越感,并倾向于认为自己比别人好。Rodwell和Demir在2012年的研究表明,我们所有人都容易受到这个决定的影响,因为我们都有一些我们没有意识到的无能[2]。对于我们的弱点,这不是一个自我蒙蔽的问题,但心理学家已经证明,人们一旦发现自己的缺陷,通常会承认它们。具有讽刺意味的是,拥有适度专业知识的人往往在他们的能力上缺乏竞争力;简而言之,他们知道有很多东西是他们不知道的。有人称之为“认知不足的泡沫”。进一步解释,当人们不熟练的时候,他们看不到自己的缺点,但是当他们非常能干的时候,他们看不到自己的能力是多么的不同寻常。知道自己有多能干,知道自己的技能与他人相比有多强,这不仅仅是提升自尊。它帮助我们,找出我们在哪里可以根据自己的决定和直觉前进,以及我们何时需要寻求建议。但为什么会有这么多的自我沉默呢?如果我们真的相信护士扮演医生熟练女仆角色的日子已经过去了,那么为什么护士允许他们的工作由他们的医生来定义呢?多年来,Friere[3]的压迫理论一直被护理文献用来定义护理职业的被压迫状态。不管我们是否愿意承认,护理界的压迫文化是普遍存在的。也许是在一个由男性医生主导的护理职业的时代,或者是在护士和医生属于不同的群体和群体的时代,在一个公开和隐蔽的行为被用来把人们放在自己的位置上的时代。Dong和Temple在2011年[4]的研究证明,受压迫的经历可能导致暴力,作为一种对同伴获得权力的方式。每当有一个统治群体和一个被压迫群体存在时,统治群体就会把所有的权力都施加在被压迫群体身上,因为被压迫群体无法向上行使权力,他们就会不自觉地开始互相攻击。弗莱彻称这为顺从攻击综合征,在护理中已经成为一个持续的循环。我们有多少次看到过这样的文章:在一个不间断的暴力循环中,“护士如何吃掉自己的孩子”?在护理等领域,横向暴力似乎不太可能发生,因为关怀和同情是这项工作的基石。压迫的阴影继续使人们不愿说出来,因为害怕受到强大的阻碍,或者害怕受到影响和引起注意,导致护士隐瞒信息和见解。在受压迫群体和护理环境文化中,改变行为和赋予权力已成为当务之急。就像任何改变的先例一样,改变护士态度的尝试可能成为消除压迫的必要起点。护士必须停止贬低自己,推动自己不断学习。教育家和哲学家多年来一直鼓励将教育作为被压迫者解放的一种方式。一个人的知识越丰富,他的能力就越不容易出现看不见的漏洞。现在是护士开始将自己视为重要的时候了,并且作为一个多学科健康团队的成员,在口头上坚持自己的立场。虽然医学和护理专业在很大程度上重叠是事实,但护理仍然是一门独立的学科,它在很大程度上依赖于沟通来确保提供有效的护理。要履行护士为病人辩护这一关键的道德责任,唯一的方法就是努力支持一种更积极的职业身份,这将导致团结和目标的增加,并最终打破压迫的循环。因为对我们中的一个人有好处的对我们每个人都有好处,因为我们都有权利获得一个安全和支持性的工作环境,因为工作场所暴力只有在被容忍和不受挑战的情况下才会获得合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tolerated and Unchallenged: Workplace Oppression among Nurses
The idea that nurses are an oppressed group was first suggested by Roberts in 1983. That the Nursing profession began at a time of patriarchy is something of importance to note. Through the years there has always been a power differential between doctors and nurses. A handful of articles and researches will support the fact that there is indeed a long standing culture of oppression in the nursing profession. Gordon [1], in her book nursing against the odds notes that nurses are viewed essentially as physician subordinates with no real autonomy. It is disturbing to realize that in the health care scenario, some people and some disciplines think that they are more important than others, with this way of thinking; the Dunning-Krueger effect comes to mind. According to this, people display illusory superiority and tend to judge themselves as better than others. Research by Rodwell and Demir in 2012 says that all of us are vulnerable to this decision because we all have pockets of incompetence we do not realize [2]. It isn't a question of ego blinding as to our weaknesses but psychologists have proven that people usually admit their deficits once they can spot them. Ironically, people who have a moderate amount of expertise often have less competence in their abilities; in short, they know enough to know that there is a lot they do not know. Some refer to this as the "bubble of inadequate perception". Further explained, when people are unskilled, they cannot see their own faults-but when they are exceptionally competent, they cannot perceive how unusual their abilities are. Knowing how competent we are and how our skills stack up against other people is more than just a self-esteem boost. It helps us, figure out where we can forge ahead on our own decisions and instincts and when we need to seek advice. But why is there so much self-silencing? If we truly believe that the days when nurses played the role of skilled handmaidens to physicians are in the past, then why do nurses allow their practice to be defined by the physicians they work with? Friere's [3] theory of oppression has been used in nursing literature to define the oppressed state of the nursing profession for years. Whether we would like to admit it or not, the culture of oppression in nursing is something prevailing. Perhaps from a time when the profession of nursing fell under a male dominated group of physicians, or from a time when nurses and doctors belonged to different herds and groups, a time when overt and covert behaviours were used to put people in their place. Researches by Dong and Temple in 2011 [4] have proven that the experience of oppression may result in violence as a way to achieve power over peers. Whenever there is a dominant group and an oppressed group, the dominant group exerts all its power on the oppressed group and because the oppressed group cannot exert their power upward, they unconsciously start attacking each other. Fletcher called this the submissive aggressive syndrome which in nursing has become a perpetuating cycle. How many times have we come across articles describing how “nurses eat their young” in a cycle of unbroken violence? Lateral violence should seem less likely in a field such as nursing where caring and compassion are cornerstones of the job. The shadow of oppression continues to bring with it reluctance to speak up with the fear of being handed powerful disincentives, or the fear of repercussions and drawing attention-causing nurses to hold back on information and insight. A change in behaviour and empowerment become an imperative in and among oppressed groups and in the culture of nursing environments. Like any antecedent to change, the attempt at shifting nurse’s attitudes may become the necessary starting point to do away with oppression. Nurses must stop devaluing themselves and push themselves to keep learning. Educators and philosophers have for many years encouraged the advancement of education as a mode of liberation by the oppressed. The more knowledgeable one becomes, the less likely one is to have invisible holes in one’s competence. It is high time that nurses start viewing themselves as important and vocally assert themselves as members of a multidisciplinary health team. While it is true that the medical and the nursing professions overlap to a significant extent, nursing is still an autonomous discipline that relies heavily on communication to ensure delivery of efficient care. And the only way to fulfil a nurse’s key ethical duty of patient advocacy is to work on espousing a more positive professional identity that would lead to an increase in unity and purpose and that could eventually break the cycle of oppression. Because what’s good for one of us is good for each of us, since we all have the right to a safe and supportive work environment and because workplace violence only gains legitimacy when it remains tolerated and unchallenged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-care practice and associated factors among type 2 adult diabetic patients on follow up clinic of Dessie referral hospital, Northeast Ethiopia Ambivalent sexist attitudes of young adolescents from the province of Jaén: Regarding the use of sexual and/or pornographic content on the internet Evidence-based primary care approach to treating people with COVID-19 infection to prevent life-threatening complications: A review of the evidence for practical application in a clinical setting COVID-19: A unique opportunity for population health to align with nursing schools to help vulnerable populations at risk of adverse outcomes Knowledge and attitude of workers towards HIV post-exposure prophylaxis and exposure of staffs to sharp injuries in Dessie Referral Hospital: 2020; A cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1