审计师认证与歧义容忍度对商业贷款决策的影响

R. Davidson, Michael Wright
{"title":"审计师认证与歧义容忍度对商业贷款决策的影响","authors":"R. Davidson, Michael Wright","doi":"10.2308/AUD.2000.19.2.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We begin this study by developing a model of the decisions made by bank loan officers when they evaluate a commercial loan. The model indicates that loan officers make three sequential decisions: level of risk associated with the loan, whether to recommend the loan, and the interest rate to be charged. We assume that the financial information included with a commercial loan application can be audited, reviewed, or prepared by management with no involvement by their auditors. We argue that the level of attestation should affect the perceived credibility, or conversely, the relative amount of ambiguity of the financial statements presented by management. Tolerance for ambiguity should affect how commercial lending officers handle this ambiguity. We test these effects by varying the level of attestation in a between‐subjects experiment with commercial loan officers. Subjects are asked to make judgments on the risk of the loan, whether they would recommend the loan, and the interest rate to be charged. Subjec...","PeriodicalId":31457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics Business Accountancy","volume":"49 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Auditor Attestation and Tolerance for Ambiguity on Commercial Lending Decisions\",\"authors\":\"R. Davidson, Michael Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/AUD.2000.19.2.67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We begin this study by developing a model of the decisions made by bank loan officers when they evaluate a commercial loan. The model indicates that loan officers make three sequential decisions: level of risk associated with the loan, whether to recommend the loan, and the interest rate to be charged. We assume that the financial information included with a commercial loan application can be audited, reviewed, or prepared by management with no involvement by their auditors. We argue that the level of attestation should affect the perceived credibility, or conversely, the relative amount of ambiguity of the financial statements presented by management. Tolerance for ambiguity should affect how commercial lending officers handle this ambiguity. We test these effects by varying the level of attestation in a between‐subjects experiment with commercial loan officers. Subjects are asked to make judgments on the risk of the loan, whether they would recommend the loan, and the interest rate to be charged. Subjec...\",\"PeriodicalId\":31457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economics Business Accountancy\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economics Business Accountancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/AUD.2000.19.2.67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics Business Accountancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/AUD.2000.19.2.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

我们通过开发银行信贷员在评估商业贷款时所做决策的模型来开始这项研究。该模型表明,信贷员做出三个连续的决策:与贷款相关的风险水平、是否推荐贷款以及收取的利率。我们假设商业贷款申请中包含的财务信息可以由管理层在没有审计员参与的情况下进行审计、审查或准备。我们认为,鉴证水平应该影响感知的可信度,或者相反,影响管理层提交的财务报表的相对模糊性。对模糊性的容忍度应该会影响商业贷款人员处理这种模糊性的方式。我们通过在商业信贷员的受试者间实验中改变认证水平来测试这些影响。受试者被要求对贷款的风险、是否会推荐贷款以及收取的利率做出判断。”…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Auditor Attestation and Tolerance for Ambiguity on Commercial Lending Decisions
We begin this study by developing a model of the decisions made by bank loan officers when they evaluate a commercial loan. The model indicates that loan officers make three sequential decisions: level of risk associated with the loan, whether to recommend the loan, and the interest rate to be charged. We assume that the financial information included with a commercial loan application can be audited, reviewed, or prepared by management with no involvement by their auditors. We argue that the level of attestation should affect the perceived credibility, or conversely, the relative amount of ambiguity of the financial statements presented by management. Tolerance for ambiguity should affect how commercial lending officers handle this ambiguity. We test these effects by varying the level of attestation in a between‐subjects experiment with commercial loan officers. Subjects are asked to make judgments on the risk of the loan, whether they would recommend the loan, and the interest rate to be charged. Subjec...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Proposed Knowledge Management Strategy by Leveraging Current Technology to Increase Productivity Operation in PT. Trimata Benua Analisis Kurikulum, Fasilitas, dan Biaya Dalam Keputusan Memilih Sekolah Pendidikan Formal dan Brand Activation Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi pada Sekolah Dasar an Nahl Islamic School di Ciangsana, Kab. Bogor) Peran Bank Syariah dalam Meningkatkan Ekonomi Mikro Umat Analisis Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Pada PT. Bank Papua Analisis Kompetensi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Melalui Kompensasi sebagai Variabel Moderasi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1