评估糖尿病饮食知识及其对南非林波波省Senwabarwana患者摄入的影响

M. Mphasha, T. Mothiba, L. Skaal
{"title":"评估糖尿病饮食知识及其对南非林波波省Senwabarwana患者摄入的影响","authors":"M. Mphasha, T. Mothiba, L. Skaal","doi":"10.1080/16089677.2021.1927584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dietary diabetes knowledge is a significant contributor to the improvement of eating habits. Adequate dietary knowledge leads to adherence to a dietary plan, which is viewed as a cornerstone in diabetes treatment, and linked with better diabetes outcomes. The aim of the study is to assess diabetes dietary knowledge and intake of patients. Method: A convergent mixed-methods parallel study design was conducted with 217 participants (200 quantitative and 17 qualitative). The quantitative phase used a cross-sectional descriptive design; data were collected using a close-ended questionnaire and analysed using SPSS Software v24.0. The qualitative phase used a phenomenological exploratory design; data were collected using interviews and analysed using 8 Steps of Tesch’s inductive, descriptive open coding technique. Results: About 81% and 81.5% of quantitative participants understand the importance of nutrition, and that eating large portion sizes may lead to increased blood sugar, respectively, compared with all qualitative participants. However, qualitative participants further reported intake of large portion sizes due to family eating patterns. Only 28.5% of quantitative participants consume breakfast, compared with all qualitative participants. Conclusion: Diabetes patients know the disadvantages of consuming large food portions, but a family culture of eating patterns prohibits patients eating accordingly, justifying the need for the adoption of family-centred diabetes care.","PeriodicalId":43919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa","volume":"32 1","pages":"89 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of diabetes dietary knowledge and its impact on intake of patients in Senwabarwana, Limpopo, South Africa\",\"authors\":\"M. Mphasha, T. Mothiba, L. Skaal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16089677.2021.1927584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Dietary diabetes knowledge is a significant contributor to the improvement of eating habits. Adequate dietary knowledge leads to adherence to a dietary plan, which is viewed as a cornerstone in diabetes treatment, and linked with better diabetes outcomes. The aim of the study is to assess diabetes dietary knowledge and intake of patients. Method: A convergent mixed-methods parallel study design was conducted with 217 participants (200 quantitative and 17 qualitative). The quantitative phase used a cross-sectional descriptive design; data were collected using a close-ended questionnaire and analysed using SPSS Software v24.0. The qualitative phase used a phenomenological exploratory design; data were collected using interviews and analysed using 8 Steps of Tesch’s inductive, descriptive open coding technique. Results: About 81% and 81.5% of quantitative participants understand the importance of nutrition, and that eating large portion sizes may lead to increased blood sugar, respectively, compared with all qualitative participants. However, qualitative participants further reported intake of large portion sizes due to family eating patterns. Only 28.5% of quantitative participants consume breakfast, compared with all qualitative participants. Conclusion: Diabetes patients know the disadvantages of consuming large food portions, but a family culture of eating patterns prohibits patients eating accordingly, justifying the need for the adoption of family-centred diabetes care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"89 - 95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16089677.2021.1927584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism and Diabetes of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16089677.2021.1927584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:饮食糖尿病知识是改善饮食习惯的重要因素。充足的饮食知识有助于坚持饮食计划,这被视为糖尿病治疗的基石,并与更好的糖尿病预后有关。该研究的目的是评估糖尿病患者的饮食知识和摄入量。方法:采用融合混合方法平行研究设计,共纳入217名受试者(定量研究200人,定性研究17人)。定量阶段采用横断面描述性设计;采用封闭式问卷收集数据,使用SPSS软件v24.0进行分析。定性阶段采用现象学探索性设计;通过访谈收集数据,并使用Tesch的8步归纳、描述性开放编码技术进行分析。结果:与所有定性参与者相比,分别有81%和81.5%的定量参与者了解营养的重要性,以及吃大份量可能导致血糖升高。然而,定性参与者进一步报告了由于家庭饮食模式而摄入大量食物的情况。与所有定性参与者相比,只有28.5%的定量参与者吃早餐。结论:糖尿病患者知道摄入大量食物的缺点,但家庭饮食模式的文化禁止患者相应地进食,因此有必要采用以家庭为中心的糖尿病护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of diabetes dietary knowledge and its impact on intake of patients in Senwabarwana, Limpopo, South Africa
Background: Dietary diabetes knowledge is a significant contributor to the improvement of eating habits. Adequate dietary knowledge leads to adherence to a dietary plan, which is viewed as a cornerstone in diabetes treatment, and linked with better diabetes outcomes. The aim of the study is to assess diabetes dietary knowledge and intake of patients. Method: A convergent mixed-methods parallel study design was conducted with 217 participants (200 quantitative and 17 qualitative). The quantitative phase used a cross-sectional descriptive design; data were collected using a close-ended questionnaire and analysed using SPSS Software v24.0. The qualitative phase used a phenomenological exploratory design; data were collected using interviews and analysed using 8 Steps of Tesch’s inductive, descriptive open coding technique. Results: About 81% and 81.5% of quantitative participants understand the importance of nutrition, and that eating large portion sizes may lead to increased blood sugar, respectively, compared with all qualitative participants. However, qualitative participants further reported intake of large portion sizes due to family eating patterns. Only 28.5% of quantitative participants consume breakfast, compared with all qualitative participants. Conclusion: Diabetes patients know the disadvantages of consuming large food portions, but a family culture of eating patterns prohibits patients eating accordingly, justifying the need for the adoption of family-centred diabetes care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Cardiorenal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors: who might benefit? MRI brain findings in patients with depression and type 2 diabetes – a scoping review Tobacco use in diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study to determine the effect of snuff tobacco use on diabetes mellitus complications over a period of nine years Effect of an educational intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour in type 2 diabetic patients at a foot and eye care practice Relevance and therapeutic implication of macroprolactinemia detection using PEG 6000 in women of childbearing age with hyperprolactinemia: experience at a tertiary hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1