用增强现实技术提供痴呆症教育:健康科学和医学可行性试点研究

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Learning Technology Pub Date : 2022-05-02 DOI:10.25304/rlt.v30.2668
Cindy Jones, Daniel Khalil, K. Mander, Alexandra Yeoh, Christian Moro
{"title":"用增强现实技术提供痴呆症教育:健康科学和医学可行性试点研究","authors":"Cindy Jones, Daniel Khalil, K. Mander, Alexandra Yeoh, Christian Moro","doi":"10.25304/rlt.v30.2668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the key physiology and anatomy of the brain, and the mechanisms underlying dementia, represents essential components within a medical curriculum. This study assessed the implementation feasibility of an augmented reality (AR) three-dimensional (3D) brain visualisation learning mode and the knowledge improvements in medical students when compared to a text-based pamphlet. The pamphlet group learnt from a double-sided information pamphlet, while the AR group used an AR app. In AR, participants held a cube in front of the camera on the tablet, rendered on-screen as a 3D brain model, and received a narrated lesson containing the same information as the pamphlet verbatim. Both resources were also evaluated for perceived usefulness via pre-post tests and written survey. A total of 24 students participated in the study. A significant overall difference in knowledge scores (p < 0.001) was found for all participants but without significant differences between groups. Prior education was a significant covariate for pre-post change (p = 0.016) across all participants but had no impact on group outcomes. Positive feedback was received on both resources where the majority perceived them as easy to use, enjoyable, and helped develop their knowledge of dementia. Both the text-based pamphlet and AR delivery modes improved knowledge, although neither was significantly superior to the other. However, the AR lesson was perceived highly for learning, and has the potential for implementation within a medical programme.","PeriodicalId":46691,"journal":{"name":"Research in Learning Technology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing dementia education with augmented reality: a health sciences and medicine feasibility pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Cindy Jones, Daniel Khalil, K. Mander, Alexandra Yeoh, Christian Moro\",\"doi\":\"10.25304/rlt.v30.2668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the key physiology and anatomy of the brain, and the mechanisms underlying dementia, represents essential components within a medical curriculum. This study assessed the implementation feasibility of an augmented reality (AR) three-dimensional (3D) brain visualisation learning mode and the knowledge improvements in medical students when compared to a text-based pamphlet. The pamphlet group learnt from a double-sided information pamphlet, while the AR group used an AR app. In AR, participants held a cube in front of the camera on the tablet, rendered on-screen as a 3D brain model, and received a narrated lesson containing the same information as the pamphlet verbatim. Both resources were also evaluated for perceived usefulness via pre-post tests and written survey. A total of 24 students participated in the study. A significant overall difference in knowledge scores (p < 0.001) was found for all participants but without significant differences between groups. Prior education was a significant covariate for pre-post change (p = 0.016) across all participants but had no impact on group outcomes. Positive feedback was received on both resources where the majority perceived them as easy to use, enjoyable, and helped develop their knowledge of dementia. Both the text-based pamphlet and AR delivery modes improved knowledge, although neither was significantly superior to the other. However, the AR lesson was perceived highly for learning, and has the potential for implementation within a medical programme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Learning Technology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Learning Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Learning Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

了解大脑的关键生理学和解剖学,以及痴呆症的潜在机制,是医学课程的重要组成部分。本研究评估了增强现实(AR)三维(3D)大脑可视化学习模式的实施可行性,以及与基于文本的小册子相比,医学生的知识改进。宣传册组学习的是一本双面信息小册子,而AR组使用的是AR应用程序。在AR中,参与者在平板电脑的摄像头前拿着一个立方体,在屏幕上呈现为3D大脑模型,并接受包含与宣传册相同信息的逐字讲解课程。通过前后测试和书面调查,还评估了这两种资源的感知有用性。共有24名学生参与了这项研究。所有参与者的知识得分有显著的总体差异(p < 0.001),但组间无显著差异。在所有参与者中,先前教育是前后变化的显著协变量(p = 0.016),但对组结果没有影响。这两种资源都得到了积极的反馈,大多数人认为它们易于使用,令人愉快,并有助于发展他们对痴呆症的认识。基于文本的小册子和AR传递模式都提高了知识,尽管两者都没有明显优于另一种。然而,增强现实的教训被认为是非常值得学习的,并且具有在医疗方案中实施的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Providing dementia education with augmented reality: a health sciences and medicine feasibility pilot study
Understanding the key physiology and anatomy of the brain, and the mechanisms underlying dementia, represents essential components within a medical curriculum. This study assessed the implementation feasibility of an augmented reality (AR) three-dimensional (3D) brain visualisation learning mode and the knowledge improvements in medical students when compared to a text-based pamphlet. The pamphlet group learnt from a double-sided information pamphlet, while the AR group used an AR app. In AR, participants held a cube in front of the camera on the tablet, rendered on-screen as a 3D brain model, and received a narrated lesson containing the same information as the pamphlet verbatim. Both resources were also evaluated for perceived usefulness via pre-post tests and written survey. A total of 24 students participated in the study. A significant overall difference in knowledge scores (p < 0.001) was found for all participants but without significant differences between groups. Prior education was a significant covariate for pre-post change (p = 0.016) across all participants but had no impact on group outcomes. Positive feedback was received on both resources where the majority perceived them as easy to use, enjoyable, and helped develop their knowledge of dementia. Both the text-based pamphlet and AR delivery modes improved knowledge, although neither was significantly superior to the other. However, the AR lesson was perceived highly for learning, and has the potential for implementation within a medical programme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Learning Technology
Research in Learning Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Research in Learning Technology: making friends and influencing people The construction of gamer identity in narratives about video game playing and formal education learning experiences The outlook of learning through metaverse technology from the perspective of teachers in the science education Social annotation: what are students’ perceptions and how does social annotation relate to grades? A theoretical framework for digital learning spaces: learning in individual spaces, working groups, communities of interest, and open connections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1