的分析?为“不伤害”/对冲突敏感的发展规划试验一种新的参与式冲突分析

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Conflict Security & Development Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1080/14678802.2021.1984682
Anthony Ware, Costas Laoutides
{"title":"的分析?为“不伤害”/对冲突敏感的发展规划试验一种新的参与式冲突分析","authors":"Anthony Ware, Costas Laoutides","doi":"10.1080/14678802.2021.1984682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT ‘Do No Harm’ or ‘conflict-sensitivity’ has been mainstreamed into the planning and implementation of development-humanitarian interventions in conflict-affected situations. An umbrella term encompassing a range of frameworks and tools, all approaches involve analysing conflict dynamics in order to minimise negative impacts and maximise support for positive change. Most, however, treat conflict analysis as largely technical, requiring external expertise, and while all espouse participation, it is not inherently embedded in any. This paper explores the practice and ideals of conflict-sensitivity, and promising, more participatory advances in the ‘critical peacebuilding’/‘local turn’ literatures, to argue the case for more genuinely participatory, grassroots conflict analysis to augment existing analysis underpinning the planning and implementation of development-humanitarian agency projects. Concluding that none yet offer tools to facilitate participation of marginalised poor, often functionally non-literate locals, into the actual analysis of conflict, it then presents and reflects upon the trial of a new, highly participatory conflict analysis approach, developed by the authors to complement a specific, highly participatory development programme in Myanmar.","PeriodicalId":46301,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Security & Development","volume":"100 1","pages":"673 - 696"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose analysis? Trial of a new participatory conflict analysis for Do No Harm/conflict-sensitive development planning\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Ware, Costas Laoutides\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14678802.2021.1984682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT ‘Do No Harm’ or ‘conflict-sensitivity’ has been mainstreamed into the planning and implementation of development-humanitarian interventions in conflict-affected situations. An umbrella term encompassing a range of frameworks and tools, all approaches involve analysing conflict dynamics in order to minimise negative impacts and maximise support for positive change. Most, however, treat conflict analysis as largely technical, requiring external expertise, and while all espouse participation, it is not inherently embedded in any. This paper explores the practice and ideals of conflict-sensitivity, and promising, more participatory advances in the ‘critical peacebuilding’/‘local turn’ literatures, to argue the case for more genuinely participatory, grassroots conflict analysis to augment existing analysis underpinning the planning and implementation of development-humanitarian agency projects. Concluding that none yet offer tools to facilitate participation of marginalised poor, often functionally non-literate locals, into the actual analysis of conflict, it then presents and reflects upon the trial of a new, highly participatory conflict analysis approach, developed by the authors to complement a specific, highly participatory development programme in Myanmar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflict Security & Development\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"673 - 696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflict Security & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.1984682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Security & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2021.1984682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在受冲突影响的情况下,“不伤害”或“冲突敏感性”已被纳入发展人道主义干预措施的规划和实施的主流。这是一个包含一系列框架和工具的总称,所有方法都涉及分析冲突动态,以尽量减少负面影响并最大限度地支持积极变革。然而,大多数人认为冲突分析主要是技术性的,需要外部专家,虽然所有人都支持参与,但它并不是固有的。本文探讨了冲突敏感性的实践和理想,以及“关键建设和平”/“地方转向”文献中有希望的、更具参与性的进展,为更真正的参与性、基层冲突分析提出了理由,以增强现有的分析,为发展人道主义机构项目的规划和实施提供基础。结论是,目前还没有提供工具来促进边缘化穷人(通常是不识字的当地人)参与实际的冲突分析,然后提出并反思了一种新的、高度参与性的冲突分析方法的试验,这种方法是作者为补充缅甸一个具体的、高度参与性的发展计划而开发的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whose analysis? Trial of a new participatory conflict analysis for Do No Harm/conflict-sensitive development planning
ABSTRACT ‘Do No Harm’ or ‘conflict-sensitivity’ has been mainstreamed into the planning and implementation of development-humanitarian interventions in conflict-affected situations. An umbrella term encompassing a range of frameworks and tools, all approaches involve analysing conflict dynamics in order to minimise negative impacts and maximise support for positive change. Most, however, treat conflict analysis as largely technical, requiring external expertise, and while all espouse participation, it is not inherently embedded in any. This paper explores the practice and ideals of conflict-sensitivity, and promising, more participatory advances in the ‘critical peacebuilding’/‘local turn’ literatures, to argue the case for more genuinely participatory, grassroots conflict analysis to augment existing analysis underpinning the planning and implementation of development-humanitarian agency projects. Concluding that none yet offer tools to facilitate participation of marginalised poor, often functionally non-literate locals, into the actual analysis of conflict, it then presents and reflects upon the trial of a new, highly participatory conflict analysis approach, developed by the authors to complement a specific, highly participatory development programme in Myanmar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict Security & Development
Conflict Security & Development INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
From snapshots to panoramas: navigating power, space, and time in the study of armed groups Natural bedfellows: corruption, criminality and the failure of international reconstruction. A case study of the Kabul Bank Elites and arbitrary power: ethical challenges and guiding principles for research with violent political actors Transitional justice interventions in Sri Lanka: why do they keep failing? ‘This is the fate of Libyan women:’ contempt, ridicule, and indifference of Seham Sergiwa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1