首席技术官:一个使命,不同的组织角色

Bertram Lohmuller, Alexander Petrikhin
{"title":"首席技术官:一个使命,不同的组织角色","authors":"Bertram Lohmuller, Alexander Petrikhin","doi":"10.1142/S2424862219500052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is dedicated to the technology management issue in the context of increasing requirements and challenges that modern executives have to face regarding efficient and proactive technology and innovation management, support of new product and service lines, and business development. The main focus of this research is the diversity of organizational roles performed by top and middle managers experiencing a strong impact of the “technological factor”. Those executives who officially occupy the highest position associated with technology responsibilities are called Chief Technology Officers (CTOs). At the same time, in many companies — especially in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) — such a position is not officially given. The managers who partially or fully perform the CTO functionality even if they do not have this official post are respectively named “Hidden” CTOs. At the same time, it is important to note that despite the presence in practice of more than 40 years, the term CTO is still associated with lots of controversy. There are dozens of contradictory definitions and disputes between practitioners and theorists that lead to a blurring of the CTO term meaning. In practice, it can be observed that the contradictions about the functionality of a technology manager can lead to the fact that the management potential cannot be fully activated and that management priorities are set incorrectly or unclearly. This paper presents a new approach to the CTO position definition based on the analysis of internal and external specifics combined with change management dynamics. Further, this new approach was used as the framework for an empirical study, based on a semi-structured questionnaire and personal interviews. In the study, the roles of international executives dealing with technological topics were investigated. The first results of the study have shown that modern technology executives are not narrowly profiled specialists focusing on purely technological issues. They are increasingly appointed as members of the top management team (TMT), for bringing in the technological perspective in the general management process. In their function, they link up between different stakeholders in terms of technology efficient use and their progressive development.","PeriodicalId":51835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Integration and Management-Innovation and Entrepreneurship","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chief Technology Officers: One Mission, Different Organizational Roles\",\"authors\":\"Bertram Lohmuller, Alexander Petrikhin\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424862219500052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is dedicated to the technology management issue in the context of increasing requirements and challenges that modern executives have to face regarding efficient and proactive technology and innovation management, support of new product and service lines, and business development. The main focus of this research is the diversity of organizational roles performed by top and middle managers experiencing a strong impact of the “technological factor”. Those executives who officially occupy the highest position associated with technology responsibilities are called Chief Technology Officers (CTOs). At the same time, in many companies — especially in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) — such a position is not officially given. The managers who partially or fully perform the CTO functionality even if they do not have this official post are respectively named “Hidden” CTOs. At the same time, it is important to note that despite the presence in practice of more than 40 years, the term CTO is still associated with lots of controversy. There are dozens of contradictory definitions and disputes between practitioners and theorists that lead to a blurring of the CTO term meaning. In practice, it can be observed that the contradictions about the functionality of a technology manager can lead to the fact that the management potential cannot be fully activated and that management priorities are set incorrectly or unclearly. This paper presents a new approach to the CTO position definition based on the analysis of internal and external specifics combined with change management dynamics. Further, this new approach was used as the framework for an empirical study, based on a semi-structured questionnaire and personal interviews. In the study, the roles of international executives dealing with technological topics were investigated. The first results of the study have shown that modern technology executives are not narrowly profiled specialists focusing on purely technological issues. They are increasingly appointed as members of the top management team (TMT), for bringing in the technological perspective in the general management process. In their function, they link up between different stakeholders in terms of technology efficient use and their progressive development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Integration and Management-Innovation and Entrepreneurship\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Integration and Management-Innovation and Entrepreneurship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862219500052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Integration and Management-Innovation and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862219500052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文致力于在不断增长的要求和挑战的背景下,技术管理问题,现代高管必须面对有关高效和主动的技术和创新管理,支持新产品和服务线,以及业务发展。本研究的主要焦点是受到“技术因素”强烈影响的中高层管理人员所扮演的组织角色的多样性。那些正式占据与技术责任相关的最高职位的高管被称为首席技术官(CTOs)。与此同时,在许多公司,特别是在中小型企业(SMEs)中,这样的职位并没有正式授予。部分或全部履行CTO职能的经理,即使他们没有这个正式职位,也分别被称为“隐藏”CTO。与此同时,值得注意的是,尽管CTO在实践中存在了40多年,但该术语仍然与许多争议有关。从业者和理论家之间有许多相互矛盾的定义和争议,导致了CTO术语含义的模糊。在实践中,可以观察到,关于技术经理功能的矛盾可能导致管理潜力不能充分发挥,管理优先级设置不正确或不明确。本文在分析企业内外部特征的基础上,结合变革管理动态,提出了一种新的CTO职位定义方法。此外,这种新方法被用作基于半结构化问卷和个人访谈的实证研究框架。在这项研究中,研究了处理技术问题的国际行政人员的作用。该研究的第一个结果表明,现代技术高管并非局限于专注于纯技术问题的专家。他们越来越多地被任命为最高管理团队(TMT)的成员,因为他们在一般管理过程中引入了技术观点。在其功能上,它们在技术的有效利用和技术的逐步发展方面将不同的利益相关者联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chief Technology Officers: One Mission, Different Organizational Roles
This paper is dedicated to the technology management issue in the context of increasing requirements and challenges that modern executives have to face regarding efficient and proactive technology and innovation management, support of new product and service lines, and business development. The main focus of this research is the diversity of organizational roles performed by top and middle managers experiencing a strong impact of the “technological factor”. Those executives who officially occupy the highest position associated with technology responsibilities are called Chief Technology Officers (CTOs). At the same time, in many companies — especially in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) — such a position is not officially given. The managers who partially or fully perform the CTO functionality even if they do not have this official post are respectively named “Hidden” CTOs. At the same time, it is important to note that despite the presence in practice of more than 40 years, the term CTO is still associated with lots of controversy. There are dozens of contradictory definitions and disputes between practitioners and theorists that lead to a blurring of the CTO term meaning. In practice, it can be observed that the contradictions about the functionality of a technology manager can lead to the fact that the management potential cannot be fully activated and that management priorities are set incorrectly or unclearly. This paper presents a new approach to the CTO position definition based on the analysis of internal and external specifics combined with change management dynamics. Further, this new approach was used as the framework for an empirical study, based on a semi-structured questionnaire and personal interviews. In the study, the roles of international executives dealing with technological topics were investigated. The first results of the study have shown that modern technology executives are not narrowly profiled specialists focusing on purely technological issues. They are increasingly appointed as members of the top management team (TMT), for bringing in the technological perspective in the general management process. In their function, they link up between different stakeholders in terms of technology efficient use and their progressive development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Integration and Management: Innovation & Entrepreneurship concentrates on the technological innovation and entrepreneurship within the ongoing transition toward industrial integration and informatization. This journal strives to offer insights into challenges, issues, and solutions associated with industrial integration and informatization, providing an interdisciplinary platform for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to engage in discussions from the perspectives of innovation and entrepreneurship. Welcoming contributions, The Journal of Industrial Integration and Management: Innovation & Entrepreneurship seeks papers addressing innovation and entrepreneurship in the context of industrial integration and informatization. The journal embraces empirical research, case study methods, and techniques derived from mathematical sciences, computer science, manufacturing engineering, and industrial integration-centric engineering management.
期刊最新文献
Breaking Barriers: The Path to Empowering Women Entrepreneurs in Saudi Arabia An ANN model to Predict Select Performance Measures for Job Scheduling System Discount or Speed?: An Analysis of Reward Offer in Exchange for No-Rush Shipping Digital transformation from planning to execution - a strategic framework based on ambidexterity and enterprise architecture & interoperability The Product's Great Journey: A Multi-triangular Agile Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1