{"title":"论损害赔偿作为侵权责任的授予","authors":"L. Chegovadze","doi":"10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-7-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the essence of the categories “harm”, “damage” and “loss”, based on the fact that they are fundamentally different: harm is caused, damage is expressed, losses serve as a method of compensation, when it is impossible or undesirable to compensate in kind. The author concludes that harm and damage is something that is always in the property sphere of the victim, while losses can change their affiliation as a provision under a tort obligation.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Recovery of Damage as Granting for a Tort Liability\",\"authors\":\"L. Chegovadze\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-7-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article reveals the essence of the categories “harm”, “damage” and “loss”, based on the fact that they are fundamentally different: harm is caused, damage is expressed, losses serve as a method of compensation, when it is impossible or undesirable to compensate in kind. The author concludes that harm and damage is something that is always in the property sphere of the victim, while losses can change their affiliation as a provision under a tort obligation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-7-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-7-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Recovery of Damage as Granting for a Tort Liability
The article reveals the essence of the categories “harm”, “damage” and “loss”, based on the fact that they are fundamentally different: harm is caused, damage is expressed, losses serve as a method of compensation, when it is impossible or undesirable to compensate in kind. The author concludes that harm and damage is something that is always in the property sphere of the victim, while losses can change their affiliation as a provision under a tort obligation.
期刊介绍:
The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.