论损害赔偿作为侵权责任的授予

L. Chegovadze
{"title":"论损害赔偿作为侵权责任的授予","authors":"L. Chegovadze","doi":"10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-7-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the essence of the categories “harm”, “damage” and “loss”, based on the fact that they are fundamentally different: harm is caused, damage is expressed, losses serve as a method of compensation, when it is impossible or undesirable to compensate in kind. The author concludes that harm and damage is something that is always in the property sphere of the victim, while losses can change their affiliation as a provision under a tort obligation.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Recovery of Damage as Granting for a Tort Liability\",\"authors\":\"L. Chegovadze\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-7-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article reveals the essence of the categories “harm”, “damage” and “loss”, based on the fact that they are fundamentally different: harm is caused, damage is expressed, losses serve as a method of compensation, when it is impossible or undesirable to compensate in kind. The author concludes that harm and damage is something that is always in the property sphere of the victim, while losses can change their affiliation as a provision under a tort obligation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-7-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-7-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从“损害”、“损害”和“损失”的本质区别出发,揭示了“损害”、“损害”和“损失”这三个范畴的本质:损害是造成的,损害是表现出来的,损失是在不可能或不希望以实物补偿的情况下作为一种补偿方法的。笔者认为,损害和损害始终属于受害人的财产范围,而损失作为侵权义务的一项规定,可以改变其从属关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Recovery of Damage as Granting for a Tort Liability
The article reveals the essence of the categories “harm”, “damage” and “loss”, based on the fact that they are fundamentally different: harm is caused, damage is expressed, losses serve as a method of compensation, when it is impossible or undesirable to compensate in kind. The author concludes that harm and damage is something that is always in the property sphere of the victim, while losses can change their affiliation as a provision under a tort obligation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.
期刊最新文献
ON THE IMPACT OF THE REGISTRATION SYSTEM OF THE REAL ESTATE TURNOVER THE PRICIPLES OF CIVIL LIABILITY (finale) ON THE DEFECTS OF THE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT “LAND PLOT” IN THE FEDERAL LAW NO. 430-FZ INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “RECENT HISTORY OF PRIVATE LAW: TO THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE RESEARCH CENTRE” THE IMPUTATION OF HARM TO A PERSON WHO IS ECONOMICALLY EASIER TO BEAR ITS CONSEQUENCES AS AN ARGUMENT FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF ALTERNATIVE CAUSATION IN TORT LAW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1