数量vs.质量:使用广告偏好管理器评估用户兴趣档案

M. Bashir, U. Farooq, Maryam Shahid, Muhammad Fareed Zaffar, Christo Wilson
{"title":"数量vs.质量:使用广告偏好管理器评估用户兴趣档案","authors":"M. Bashir, U. Farooq, Maryam Shahid, Muhammad Fareed Zaffar, Christo Wilson","doi":"10.14722/ndss.2019.23392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—Widely reported privacy issues concerning major online advertising platforms (e.g., Facebook) have heightened concerns among users about the data that is collected about them. However, while we have a comprehensive understanding who collects data on users, as well as how tracking is implemented, there is still a significant gap in our understanding: what information do advertisers actually infer about users, and is this information accurate? In this study, we leverage Ad Preference Managers ( APMs ) as a lens through which to address this gap. APMs are transparency tools offered by some advertising platforms that allow users to see the interest profiles that are constructed about them. We recruited 220 participants to install an IRB approved browser extension that collected their interest profiles from four APMs (Google, Facebook, Oracle BlueKai, and Neilsen eXelate), as well as behavioral and survey data. We use this data to analyze the size and correctness of interest profiles, compare their composition across the four platforms, and investigate the origins of the data underlying these profiles.","PeriodicalId":20444,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantity vs. Quality: Evaluating User Interest Profiles Using Ad Preference Managers\",\"authors\":\"M. Bashir, U. Farooq, Maryam Shahid, Muhammad Fareed Zaffar, Christo Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.14722/ndss.2019.23392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"—Widely reported privacy issues concerning major online advertising platforms (e.g., Facebook) have heightened concerns among users about the data that is collected about them. However, while we have a comprehensive understanding who collects data on users, as well as how tracking is implemented, there is still a significant gap in our understanding: what information do advertisers actually infer about users, and is this information accurate? In this study, we leverage Ad Preference Managers ( APMs ) as a lens through which to address this gap. APMs are transparency tools offered by some advertising platforms that allow users to see the interest profiles that are constructed about them. We recruited 220 participants to install an IRB approved browser extension that collected their interest profiles from four APMs (Google, Facebook, Oracle BlueKai, and Neilsen eXelate), as well as behavioral and survey data. We use this data to analyze the size and correctness of interest profiles, compare their composition across the four platforms, and investigate the origins of the data underlying these profiles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2019.23392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2019.23392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

-关于主要在线广告平台(例如Facebook)的广泛报道的隐私问题加剧了用户对收集有关他们的数据的担忧。然而,虽然我们对谁收集用户数据以及如何实施跟踪有了全面的了解,但我们的理解仍然存在重大差距:广告商实际上推断了用户的哪些信息,这些信息是否准确?在本研究中,我们利用广告偏好管理器(APMs)作为解决这一差距的镜头。apm是一些广告平台提供的透明工具,允许用户查看有关他们的兴趣配置文件。我们招募了220名参与者来安装一个IRB认可的浏览器扩展,该扩展从四个apm (Google, Facebook, Oracle BlueKai和nielsen eXelate)中收集他们的兴趣概况,以及行为和调查数据。我们使用这些数据来分析兴趣概况的大小和正确性,比较四个平台的组成,并调查这些概况背后的数据来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantity vs. Quality: Evaluating User Interest Profiles Using Ad Preference Managers
—Widely reported privacy issues concerning major online advertising platforms (e.g., Facebook) have heightened concerns among users about the data that is collected about them. However, while we have a comprehensive understanding who collects data on users, as well as how tracking is implemented, there is still a significant gap in our understanding: what information do advertisers actually infer about users, and is this information accurate? In this study, we leverage Ad Preference Managers ( APMs ) as a lens through which to address this gap. APMs are transparency tools offered by some advertising platforms that allow users to see the interest profiles that are constructed about them. We recruited 220 participants to install an IRB approved browser extension that collected their interest profiles from four APMs (Google, Facebook, Oracle BlueKai, and Neilsen eXelate), as well as behavioral and survey data. We use this data to analyze the size and correctness of interest profiles, compare their composition across the four platforms, and investigate the origins of the data underlying these profiles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Network and System Security: 17th International Conference, NSS 2023, Canterbury, UK, August 14–16, 2023, Proceedings Network and System Security: 16th International Conference, NSS 2022, Denarau Island, Fiji, December 9–12, 2022, Proceedings Network and System Security: 15th International Conference, NSS 2021, Tianjin, China, October 23, 2021, Proceedings Network and System Security: 14th International Conference, NSS 2020, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, November 25–27, 2020, Proceedings Neuro-Symbolic Execution: Augmenting Symbolic Execution with Neural Constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1