Co-use野生动物和人类在道路上现有的交叉结构:一厢情愿的想法?

IF 1.2 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Nature Conservation Research Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.3897/natureconservation.47.73060
Kendra Warnock-Juteau, Valérie Bolduc, Daniella LoScerbo, M. Anderson, C. Daguet, Jochen A. G. Jaeger
{"title":"Co-use野生动物和人类在道路上现有的交叉结构:一厢情愿的想法?","authors":"Kendra Warnock-Juteau, Valérie Bolduc, Daniella LoScerbo, M. Anderson, C. Daguet, Jochen A. G. Jaeger","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.47.73060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses existing human-purpose underpasses below an unfenced high-traffic 4-lane highway in the Appalachian region of Quebec, Canada, as potential crossing structures for native mammal species. Eight underpasses of three types (five water culverts with minimum height and width of 1.8 m, one low-use gravel road byway, and two railroad underpasses) were continuously monitored by motion-detection infrared camera traps for time periods spanning up to 778 days (September 2016 to November 2018). We asked how the ratios of successful crossings through the structures (termed full crossings) and aversions to the structures (termed aversions) differed between species and we explored the influence of human activity levels on the use of these structures by wildlife. All monitored crossing structures had low human observations (with averages of less than 35 human activities per day). Our results provide evidence that 21 species of mammals in the study area successfully crossed through at least one of the eight observed underpasses on a minimum of one occasion. Some species were observed crossing through some of the underpasses on a regular basis, namely raccoon, red fox, and white-tailed deer. We propose a classification of mammal species into five human co-use classes (no or low co-use to very high co-use) to explore the relationship between mammal use of the structures and human presence. We found that humans and mammals were observed sharing passages for the four mammal species identified as tolerant of human co-use (high and very high co-use classes), but co-use was observed to be limited or not occurring for most other species. The strengths of this study include the length of time during which monitoring took place, as well as the placement of four cameras at each structure (two facing inward and two facing outward) to determine whether individuals successfully crossed through the structures or displayed avoidance behaviour. The results suggest select species of mammals show some co-use with humans at existing underpasses. The activity patterns of mammals documented over the two-year study can assist with future estimates of highway permeability. Further, measurements of human and mammal co-use have species-specific implications for retrofitting existing structures and constructing wildlife fences and purpose-built wildlife passages.","PeriodicalId":54166,"journal":{"name":"Nature Conservation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-use of existing crossing structures along roads by wildlife and humans: Wishful thinking?\",\"authors\":\"Kendra Warnock-Juteau, Valérie Bolduc, Daniella LoScerbo, M. Anderson, C. Daguet, Jochen A. G. Jaeger\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/natureconservation.47.73060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study assesses existing human-purpose underpasses below an unfenced high-traffic 4-lane highway in the Appalachian region of Quebec, Canada, as potential crossing structures for native mammal species. Eight underpasses of three types (five water culverts with minimum height and width of 1.8 m, one low-use gravel road byway, and two railroad underpasses) were continuously monitored by motion-detection infrared camera traps for time periods spanning up to 778 days (September 2016 to November 2018). We asked how the ratios of successful crossings through the structures (termed full crossings) and aversions to the structures (termed aversions) differed between species and we explored the influence of human activity levels on the use of these structures by wildlife. All monitored crossing structures had low human observations (with averages of less than 35 human activities per day). Our results provide evidence that 21 species of mammals in the study area successfully crossed through at least one of the eight observed underpasses on a minimum of one occasion. Some species were observed crossing through some of the underpasses on a regular basis, namely raccoon, red fox, and white-tailed deer. We propose a classification of mammal species into five human co-use classes (no or low co-use to very high co-use) to explore the relationship between mammal use of the structures and human presence. We found that humans and mammals were observed sharing passages for the four mammal species identified as tolerant of human co-use (high and very high co-use classes), but co-use was observed to be limited or not occurring for most other species. The strengths of this study include the length of time during which monitoring took place, as well as the placement of four cameras at each structure (two facing inward and two facing outward) to determine whether individuals successfully crossed through the structures or displayed avoidance behaviour. The results suggest select species of mammals show some co-use with humans at existing underpasses. The activity patterns of mammals documented over the two-year study can assist with future estimates of highway permeability. Further, measurements of human and mammal co-use have species-specific implications for retrofitting existing structures and constructing wildlife fences and purpose-built wildlife passages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Conservation Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Conservation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.47.73060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.47.73060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究评估了加拿大魁北克省阿巴拉契亚地区一条无围栏的高流量4车道高速公路下方现有的人类用途地下通道,作为当地哺乳动物物种的潜在穿越结构。通过运动探测红外摄像机陷阱连续监测三种类型的8条地下通道(5条最低高度和宽度为1.8米的涵洞,1条低使用率的砾石公路旁路和2条铁路地下通道),时间跨度为778天(2016年9月至2018年11月)。我们询问了不同物种成功穿越结构(称为完全穿越)和厌恶结构(称为厌恶)的比例是如何不同的,我们探索了人类活动水平对野生动物使用这些结构的影响。所有监测的交叉结构的人类观测值都很低(平均每天少于35次人类活动)。我们的研究结果提供了证据,表明研究区域的21种哺乳动物至少一次成功地穿过8个观察到的地下通道中的至少一个。观察到一些物种定期穿过一些地下通道,即浣熊,赤狐和白尾鹿。我们将哺乳动物分为5类(无或低共利用到高共利用),以探讨哺乳动物对结构的使用与人类存在之间的关系。我们发现,人类和哺乳动物在四种被确定为人类共用耐受性的哺乳动物物种(高和非常高的共用等级)中被观察到共享传代,但在大多数其他物种中被观察到有限的共用或没有发生。这项研究的优势包括进行监测的时间长度,以及在每个结构上放置四个摄像头(两个朝内,两个朝外),以确定个体是否成功穿过结构或表现出回避行为。结果表明,某些哺乳动物在现有的地下通道上与人类共同使用。这项为期两年的研究记录了哺乳动物的活动模式,有助于未来对公路渗透性的估计。此外,人类和哺乳动物共同利用的测量结果对改造现有结构、建造野生动物围栏和专门建造的野生动物通道具有特定物种的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-use of existing crossing structures along roads by wildlife and humans: Wishful thinking?
This study assesses existing human-purpose underpasses below an unfenced high-traffic 4-lane highway in the Appalachian region of Quebec, Canada, as potential crossing structures for native mammal species. Eight underpasses of three types (five water culverts with minimum height and width of 1.8 m, one low-use gravel road byway, and two railroad underpasses) were continuously monitored by motion-detection infrared camera traps for time periods spanning up to 778 days (September 2016 to November 2018). We asked how the ratios of successful crossings through the structures (termed full crossings) and aversions to the structures (termed aversions) differed between species and we explored the influence of human activity levels on the use of these structures by wildlife. All monitored crossing structures had low human observations (with averages of less than 35 human activities per day). Our results provide evidence that 21 species of mammals in the study area successfully crossed through at least one of the eight observed underpasses on a minimum of one occasion. Some species were observed crossing through some of the underpasses on a regular basis, namely raccoon, red fox, and white-tailed deer. We propose a classification of mammal species into five human co-use classes (no or low co-use to very high co-use) to explore the relationship between mammal use of the structures and human presence. We found that humans and mammals were observed sharing passages for the four mammal species identified as tolerant of human co-use (high and very high co-use classes), but co-use was observed to be limited or not occurring for most other species. The strengths of this study include the length of time during which monitoring took place, as well as the placement of four cameras at each structure (two facing inward and two facing outward) to determine whether individuals successfully crossed through the structures or displayed avoidance behaviour. The results suggest select species of mammals show some co-use with humans at existing underpasses. The activity patterns of mammals documented over the two-year study can assist with future estimates of highway permeability. Further, measurements of human and mammal co-use have species-specific implications for retrofitting existing structures and constructing wildlife fences and purpose-built wildlife passages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Conservation Research
Nature Conservation Research BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the threat status of reptile species from Vietnam - Implementation of the One Plan Approach to Conservation Conserving the threatened woody vegetation on dune slopes: Monitoring the decline and designing adaptive strategies for restoration Has climate change hijacked the environmental agenda? Dynamic change of habitat quality and its key driving factors in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China Performance of SNP markers for parentage analysis in the Italian Alpine brown bear using non-invasive samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1