IF 0.1 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, SLAVIC Primerjalna Knjizevnost Pub Date : 2021-05-02 DOI:10.3986/PKN.V44.I1.06
Matic Kocijančič
{"title":"»Nič drugega kot nič«: negativna teopolitika Sofoklove Antigone","authors":"Matic Kocijančič","doi":"10.3986/PKN.V44.I1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the ending of Sophocles’s Antigone, the ingenious portrayal of Creon’s breakdown, remorse and withdrawal, which is too often overlooked in modern interpretations of this fundamental work of tragedy, focusing as they do above all on the central conflict between Antigone and Creon. A careful analysis of the concluding lines spoken by Creon and the Chorus, both in the original and in the rich tradition of Slovenian translations, and of their broader intellectual-historical context (particularly the Attic understanding of the relationship between divine and state law), reveals a challenging theopolitical point that traces the horizon of meaning of Sophocles’s entire work. In connection with this finding, the article develops the concept of negative politics, which provides a framework for understanding the two antagonistic theopolitical paradigms in Antigone and how the particular dynamics of the clash between them also foreshadows some recognizable spiritual and social upheavals of modernity.","PeriodicalId":52032,"journal":{"name":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/PKN.V44.I1.06","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨索福克勒斯的《安提戈涅》的结局,巧妙地描绘了克瑞翁的崩溃、悔恨和退缩,这在现代对这部基本悲剧作品的解释中经常被忽视,因为他们首先关注的是安提戈涅和克瑞翁之间的中心冲突。仔细分析克瑞翁和歌舞团的结语,无论是在原文中还是在丰富的斯洛文尼亚语翻译传统中,以及它们更广泛的知识历史背景下(特别是阿提卡对神法和国家法之间关系的理解),揭示了一个具有挑战性的神学政治观点,它追溯了索福克勒斯整个作品的意义。结合这一发现,本文发展了消极政治的概念,为理解《安提戈涅》中两种对立的神权政治范式提供了一个框架,以及它们之间冲突的特定动力如何预示着现代性的一些可识别的精神和社会动荡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
»Nič drugega kot nič«: negativna teopolitika Sofoklove Antigone
This article deals with the ending of Sophocles’s Antigone, the ingenious portrayal of Creon’s breakdown, remorse and withdrawal, which is too often overlooked in modern interpretations of this fundamental work of tragedy, focusing as they do above all on the central conflict between Antigone and Creon. A careful analysis of the concluding lines spoken by Creon and the Chorus, both in the original and in the rich tradition of Slovenian translations, and of their broader intellectual-historical context (particularly the Attic understanding of the relationship between divine and state law), reveals a challenging theopolitical point that traces the horizon of meaning of Sophocles’s entire work. In connection with this finding, the article develops the concept of negative politics, which provides a framework for understanding the two antagonistic theopolitical paradigms in Antigone and how the particular dynamics of the clash between them also foreshadows some recognizable spiritual and social upheavals of modernity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primerjalna Knjizevnost
Primerjalna Knjizevnost LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Moč odsotnega: eluzivnost resničnosti v dveh Antigonah »Nič drugega kot nič«: negativna teopolitika Sofoklove Antigone O veličini in dostojanstvu žrtve: antropološki nauk Sofoklove Antigone Svetovna primerjalna književnost The Concretization of the Literary Work of Art: Elements for a Comparison between Roman Ingarden and Wolfgang Iser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1