“自由的最大属性”:水、亲属关系和殖民地圭亚那的村庄运动

Catherine Peters
{"title":"“自由的最大属性”:水、亲属关系和殖民地圭亚那的村庄运动","authors":"Catherine Peters","doi":"10.1353/jch.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Within twelve years of de jure emancipation, Afro-Guyanese residents purchased twenty-four abandoned estates through collectives of up to 168 individuals. During the period, the majority of colonial Guyana's population resided on a narrow coastal strip that enslaved Africans had reclaimed from the sea by moving at least 100 million tons of soil. Maintenance of this land demanded centralized infrastructure that the colonial government denied to Afro-Guyanese collectives, thereby exposing them to the sea's eroding force. Nevertheless, emancipated people knew how to manage water, having laboured as water engineers for cotton, coffee and sugar plantations. In spite of the risks, they still decided to purchase large tracts of land for the possibilities it could engender.Early historical scholarship on this significant development in Afro-Guyanese land purchase, also known as the \"village movement\", assessed its apparent \"failures\". Such judgements were delivered without attending to the possibility that the movement was not pursuing agriculture, oriented exclusively around export commodity production. The attempt here is to approximate what Afro-Guyanese collectives tried to achieve on their own terms. The village movement produced new geographies by and for Afro-Guyanese residents who seized the opportunity to live together according to their own means of structuring value. These collectives wagered their ecological knowledge, and particularly their experience with water, to recast plantation land into plots for alternative futures.","PeriodicalId":83090,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Caribbean history","volume":"57 1","pages":"24 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"The Greatest Attributes of Freedom\\\": Water, Kinship, and the Village Movement in Colonial Guyana\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jch.2022.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Within twelve years of de jure emancipation, Afro-Guyanese residents purchased twenty-four abandoned estates through collectives of up to 168 individuals. During the period, the majority of colonial Guyana's population resided on a narrow coastal strip that enslaved Africans had reclaimed from the sea by moving at least 100 million tons of soil. Maintenance of this land demanded centralized infrastructure that the colonial government denied to Afro-Guyanese collectives, thereby exposing them to the sea's eroding force. Nevertheless, emancipated people knew how to manage water, having laboured as water engineers for cotton, coffee and sugar plantations. In spite of the risks, they still decided to purchase large tracts of land for the possibilities it could engender.Early historical scholarship on this significant development in Afro-Guyanese land purchase, also known as the \\\"village movement\\\", assessed its apparent \\\"failures\\\". Such judgements were delivered without attending to the possibility that the movement was not pursuing agriculture, oriented exclusively around export commodity production. The attempt here is to approximate what Afro-Guyanese collectives tried to achieve on their own terms. The village movement produced new geographies by and for Afro-Guyanese residents who seized the opportunity to live together according to their own means of structuring value. These collectives wagered their ecological knowledge, and particularly their experience with water, to recast plantation land into plots for alternative futures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Caribbean history\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"24 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Caribbean history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jch.2022.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Caribbean history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jch.2022.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在法律上解放的12年里,非裔圭亚那居民通过168人的集体购买了24个被遗弃的庄园。在此期间,圭亚那殖民地的大多数人口居住在一条狭窄的沿海地带,奴役的非洲人通过移动至少1亿吨土壤从海上开垦了这条地带。这片土地的维护需要集中的基础设施,殖民政府拒绝给予非裔圭亚那集体,从而使他们暴露在海洋的侵蚀力量之下。然而,解放了的人们知道如何管理水,他们曾在棉花、咖啡和甘蔗种植园担任水利工程师。尽管有风险,他们仍然决定购买大片土地,因为它可能产生的可能性。早期的历史学者对非洲-圭亚那土地购买的这一重大发展(也被称为“村庄运动”)进行了评估,认为其明显的“失败”。作出这种判断时,没有考虑到该运动不追求农业的可能性,而农业完全以出口商品生产为导向。这里的尝试是接近非裔圭亚那集体试图以自己的条件实现的目标。乡村运动为非裔圭亚那居民创造了新的地理位置,他们根据自己的结构价值方式抓住了共同生活的机会。这些集体以他们的生态知识,特别是他们对水的经验为赌注,将种植园改造成未来的小块土地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"The Greatest Attributes of Freedom": Water, Kinship, and the Village Movement in Colonial Guyana
Abstract:Within twelve years of de jure emancipation, Afro-Guyanese residents purchased twenty-four abandoned estates through collectives of up to 168 individuals. During the period, the majority of colonial Guyana's population resided on a narrow coastal strip that enslaved Africans had reclaimed from the sea by moving at least 100 million tons of soil. Maintenance of this land demanded centralized infrastructure that the colonial government denied to Afro-Guyanese collectives, thereby exposing them to the sea's eroding force. Nevertheless, emancipated people knew how to manage water, having laboured as water engineers for cotton, coffee and sugar plantations. In spite of the risks, they still decided to purchase large tracts of land for the possibilities it could engender.Early historical scholarship on this significant development in Afro-Guyanese land purchase, also known as the "village movement", assessed its apparent "failures". Such judgements were delivered without attending to the possibility that the movement was not pursuing agriculture, oriented exclusively around export commodity production. The attempt here is to approximate what Afro-Guyanese collectives tried to achieve on their own terms. The village movement produced new geographies by and for Afro-Guyanese residents who seized the opportunity to live together according to their own means of structuring value. These collectives wagered their ecological knowledge, and particularly their experience with water, to recast plantation land into plots for alternative futures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
George Padmore's: Black Internationalism by Rodney Worrell (review) "Dishonourable Blacks"? The 1983 "Rebel Tour" and Perspectives on Jamaican Identity and Nationhood “Dishonourable Blacks”? The 1983 “Rebel Tour” and Jamaican Nationhood and Identity Book Review of George Padmore’s: Black Internationalism by Rodney Worrell "To Work Her Grounds": Provision Grounds, Gardens, and Subsistence in Late-Slavery Trinidad, 1824–1833
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1