鼓舞人心,但令人疲惫:领导者的情感复杂性如何塑造追随者的创造力

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organization Science Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.1287/orsc.2019.13152
Jakob Stollberger, Yves R. F. Guillaume, D. van Knippenberg
{"title":"鼓舞人心,但令人疲惫:领导者的情感复杂性如何塑造追随者的创造力","authors":"Jakob Stollberger, Yves R. F. Guillaume, D. van Knippenberg","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2019.13152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moods and emotions are an important influence on creativity at work, and recent developments point to emotional complexity as a particularly relevant influence in this respect. We develop this line of research by shifting focus from emotional complexity as an intrapersonal influence to emotional complexity as an interpersonal influence between leader and subordinate. Specifically, we integrate the social-functional approach to emotions with theory on self-regulation to shed light on the effects of leader emotional complexity (LEC), operationalized as alternations between leader displays of happiness and anger, on follower creativity. Three studies, two video experiments (Studies 1 and 2) and a multisource experience sampling study (Study 3), revealed that, on one hand, LEC stimulated creativity by enhancing the cognitive flexibility of followers; on the other hand, LEC led to heightened self-regulatory resource depletion, which compromised follower creativity. Our results also showed that trait epistemic motivation strengthened the positive effects of LEC on creativity via cognitive flexibility, the negative effects via self-regulatory resource depletion were also stronger for followers with higher trait epistemic motivation. Combined, results suggest that leader displays of emotional complexity can be tiring but are even more inspiring. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.13152 .","PeriodicalId":48462,"journal":{"name":"Organization Science","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inspiring, Yet Tiring: How Leader Emotional Complexity Shapes Follower Creativity\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Stollberger, Yves R. F. Guillaume, D. van Knippenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/orsc.2019.13152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Moods and emotions are an important influence on creativity at work, and recent developments point to emotional complexity as a particularly relevant influence in this respect. We develop this line of research by shifting focus from emotional complexity as an intrapersonal influence to emotional complexity as an interpersonal influence between leader and subordinate. Specifically, we integrate the social-functional approach to emotions with theory on self-regulation to shed light on the effects of leader emotional complexity (LEC), operationalized as alternations between leader displays of happiness and anger, on follower creativity. Three studies, two video experiments (Studies 1 and 2) and a multisource experience sampling study (Study 3), revealed that, on one hand, LEC stimulated creativity by enhancing the cognitive flexibility of followers; on the other hand, LEC led to heightened self-regulatory resource depletion, which compromised follower creativity. Our results also showed that trait epistemic motivation strengthened the positive effects of LEC on creativity via cognitive flexibility, the negative effects via self-regulatory resource depletion were also stronger for followers with higher trait epistemic motivation. Combined, results suggest that leader displays of emotional complexity can be tiring but are even more inspiring. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.13152 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":48462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization Science\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.13152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.13152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

情绪和情绪对工作中的创造力有重要影响,最近的发展表明情绪复杂性在这方面具有特别相关的影响。我们通过将重点从情感复杂性作为一种人际影响转移到情感复杂性作为领导和下属之间的人际影响来发展这条研究路线。具体而言,我们将情绪的社会功能研究方法与自我调节理论相结合,以揭示领导者情绪复杂性(LEC)对追随者创造力的影响,LEC以领导者表现出快乐和愤怒的交替形式运作。三个研究,两个视频实验(研究1和研究2)和一个多源经验抽样研究(研究3)表明,LEC一方面通过增强追随者的认知灵活性来刺激创造力;另一方面,LEC导致自我调节资源枯竭加剧,从而损害了追随者的创造力。研究结果还表明,特质认知动机通过认知灵活性增强了LEC对创造力的正向影响,而特质认知动机越高,LEC通过自我调节资源耗竭对创造力的负向影响也越强。综上所述,研究结果表明,领导者表现出复杂的情绪可能会让人疲惫,但却更能鼓舞人心。补充材料:在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.13152上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inspiring, Yet Tiring: How Leader Emotional Complexity Shapes Follower Creativity
Moods and emotions are an important influence on creativity at work, and recent developments point to emotional complexity as a particularly relevant influence in this respect. We develop this line of research by shifting focus from emotional complexity as an intrapersonal influence to emotional complexity as an interpersonal influence between leader and subordinate. Specifically, we integrate the social-functional approach to emotions with theory on self-regulation to shed light on the effects of leader emotional complexity (LEC), operationalized as alternations between leader displays of happiness and anger, on follower creativity. Three studies, two video experiments (Studies 1 and 2) and a multisource experience sampling study (Study 3), revealed that, on one hand, LEC stimulated creativity by enhancing the cognitive flexibility of followers; on the other hand, LEC led to heightened self-regulatory resource depletion, which compromised follower creativity. Our results also showed that trait epistemic motivation strengthened the positive effects of LEC on creativity via cognitive flexibility, the negative effects via self-regulatory resource depletion were also stronger for followers with higher trait epistemic motivation. Combined, results suggest that leader displays of emotional complexity can be tiring but are even more inspiring. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.13152 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organization Science
Organization Science MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
166
期刊介绍: Organization Science is ranked among the top journals in management by the Social Science Citation Index in terms of impact and is widely recognized in the fields of strategy, management, and organization theory. Organization Science provides one umbrella for the publication of research from all over the world in fields such as organization theory, strategic management, sociology, economics, political science, history, information science, communication theory, and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Can You Go Home Again? Performance Assistance Between Boomerangs and Incumbent Employees Cautious Exploitation: Learning and Search in Problems of Evaluation and Discovery Embrace the Unexpected: How Organizations Foster Participatory Improvisation with Customers Temporal Miscoupling: The Challenges and Consequences of Enacting a Practice in Decline Mavericks and Diplomats: Bridging Commercial and Institutional Entrepreneurship for Society’s Grand Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1