Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen, Matias Hirvikoski, Julius Rajamäki
{"title":"芬兰冲孔剪切设计与现有方法的比较","authors":"Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen, Matias Hirvikoski, Julius Rajamäki","doi":"10.2478/ncr-2019-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the beginning of 2017 the design method for punching shear in Finland was changed. The method presented in Eurocode 2 was adopted with some nationally determined parameters and rules. During 2016 and 2017 computational analyses were conducted to compare the previous national design method and the new one. Comparison setups were created in which different parameters were varied. The results were presented the predicted punching resistances differ differences are significant and can be almost 60% in some cases.","PeriodicalId":42762,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Concrete Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"131 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Punching Shear Design in Finland According to the Current and the Former Method\",\"authors\":\"Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen, Matias Hirvikoski, Julius Rajamäki\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ncr-2019-0092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the beginning of 2017 the design method for punching shear in Finland was changed. The method presented in Eurocode 2 was adopted with some nationally determined parameters and rules. During 2016 and 2017 computational analyses were conducted to compare the previous national design method and the new one. Comparison setups were created in which different parameters were varied. The results were presented the predicted punching resistances differ differences are significant and can be almost 60% in some cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Concrete Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"131 - 144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Concrete Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ncr-2019-0092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Concrete Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ncr-2019-0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Punching Shear Design in Finland According to the Current and the Former Method
Abstract In the beginning of 2017 the design method for punching shear in Finland was changed. The method presented in Eurocode 2 was adopted with some nationally determined parameters and rules. During 2016 and 2017 computational analyses were conducted to compare the previous national design method and the new one. Comparison setups were created in which different parameters were varied. The results were presented the predicted punching resistances differ differences are significant and can be almost 60% in some cases.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
