Hou-Chuan Lai , Chung-Bao Hsieh , Chih-Shung Wong , Chun-Chang Yeh , Zhi-Fu Wu
{"title":"术前和术后硬膜外吗啡、罗哌卡因、氯胺酮和纳洛酮治疗对上腹部手术术后疼痛的控制","authors":"Hou-Chuan Lai , Chung-Bao Hsieh , Chih-Shung Wong , Chun-Chang Yeh , Zhi-Fu Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.aat.2016.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective(s)</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that preincisional epidural morphine, bupivacaine, and ketamine combined with epidural anesthesia (EA) and general anesthesia (GA) provided pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery. Recent studies reported that ultralow-dose naloxone enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine in rats. This study investigated the benefits of preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine + ropivacaine + ketamine + naloxone (M + R + K + N) treatment for achieving postoperative pain relief in upper abdominal surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty American Society of Anesthesiology I–II patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery were allocated to four groups in a randomized, single-blinded study. All patients received combined GA and EA with a continuous epidural infusion of 2% lidocaine (6–8 mL/h) 30 minutes after pain regimen. After GA induction, in Group I, an epidural pain control regimen (total 10 mL) was administered using 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg; M + R); in Group II, 1% lidocaine 8 (mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg; M + R + K); in Group III, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + N); and in Group IV, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + K + N), respectively. All patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with different pain regimens to control subsequent postoperative pain for 3 days following surgery. During the 3-day period following surgery, PCEA consumption (mL), numerical rating scale (NRS) score while cough/moving, and analgesic-related adverse effects were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total PCEA consumption for the 3-day observation period was 161.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17.8 mL, 103.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->21.7 mL, 152.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->25.6 mL, and 74.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.9 mL for Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The cough/moving NRS scores were significantly lower in Group IV patients than Groups I and III patients at 4 hours, 12 hours, and on Days 1 and 2 following surgery except for Group II (<em>p</em> < 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R + K + N treatment provides an ideal postoperative pain management than preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R, M + R + K, and M + R + N treatments in upper abdominal surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87042,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","volume":"54 3","pages":"Pages 88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2016.10.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine, ropivacaine, ketamine, and naloxone treatment for postoperative pain management in upper abdominal surgery\",\"authors\":\"Hou-Chuan Lai , Chung-Bao Hsieh , Chih-Shung Wong , Chun-Chang Yeh , Zhi-Fu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aat.2016.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective(s)</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that preincisional epidural morphine, bupivacaine, and ketamine combined with epidural anesthesia (EA) and general anesthesia (GA) provided pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery. Recent studies reported that ultralow-dose naloxone enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine in rats. This study investigated the benefits of preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine + ropivacaine + ketamine + naloxone (M + R + K + N) treatment for achieving postoperative pain relief in upper abdominal surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty American Society of Anesthesiology I–II patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery were allocated to four groups in a randomized, single-blinded study. All patients received combined GA and EA with a continuous epidural infusion of 2% lidocaine (6–8 mL/h) 30 minutes after pain regimen. After GA induction, in Group I, an epidural pain control regimen (total 10 mL) was administered using 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg; M + R); in Group II, 1% lidocaine 8 (mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg; M + R + K); in Group III, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + N); and in Group IV, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + K + N), respectively. All patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with different pain regimens to control subsequent postoperative pain for 3 days following surgery. During the 3-day period following surgery, PCEA consumption (mL), numerical rating scale (NRS) score while cough/moving, and analgesic-related adverse effects were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total PCEA consumption for the 3-day observation period was 161.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17.8 mL, 103.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->21.7 mL, 152.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->25.6 mL, and 74.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.9 mL for Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The cough/moving NRS scores were significantly lower in Group IV patients than Groups I and III patients at 4 hours, 12 hours, and on Days 1 and 2 following surgery except for Group II (<em>p</em> < 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R + K + N treatment provides an ideal postoperative pain management than preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R, M + R + K, and M + R + N treatments in upper abdominal surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 88-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2016.10.004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875459716300686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875459716300686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:既往研究表明,术前硬膜外吗啡、布比卡因、氯胺酮联合硬膜外麻醉(EA)和全身麻醉(GA)可为上腹部手术提供先发制人的镇痛。近年来有研究报道,超低剂量纳洛酮可增强吗啡对大鼠的抗伤害感受作用。本研究探讨了术前和术后硬膜外吗啡+罗哌卡因+氯胺酮+纳洛酮(M + R + K + N)治疗对上腹部手术术后疼痛缓解的益处。方法80例美国麻醉学学会I-II期拟行上腹部大手术的患者分为4组,采用随机、单盲研究。所有患者均接受GA和EA联合治疗,并在疼痛治疗后30分钟持续硬膜外输注2%利多卡因(6 - 8ml /h)。GA诱导后,I组采用1%利多卡因(8ml) +吗啡(2mg) +罗哌卡因(20mg)的硬膜外镇痛方案(总10ml);m + r);II组1%利多卡因8 (mL) +吗啡(2mg) +罗哌卡因(20mg) +氯胺酮(20mg);m + r + k);III组1%利多卡因(8 mL) +吗啡(2 mg) +罗哌卡因(20 mg) +纳洛酮(2 μg);m + r + n);IV组1%利多卡因(8 mL) +吗啡(2 mg) +罗哌卡因(20 mg) +氯胺酮(20 mg) +纳洛酮(2 μg);M + R + K + N)。所有患者均在术后3天内采用不同疼痛方案的患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)来控制术后疼痛。术后3天记录患者PCEA消耗(mL)、咳嗽/活动时数值评定量表(NRS)评分及镇痛相关不良反应。结果3 d观察期内,1、2、3、4组患者PCEA总消耗量分别为161.5±17.8 mL、103.2±21.7 mL、152.4±25.6 mL、74.1±16.9 mL。(p & lt;0.05)。除II组患者外,IV组患者在术后4小时、12小时和第1、2天咳嗽/移动NRS评分显著低于I组和III组患者(p <0.05)。结论切口前及术后硬膜外M + R + K + N治疗比切口前及术后硬膜外M + R、M + R + K、M + R + N治疗更理想。
Preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine, ropivacaine, ketamine, and naloxone treatment for postoperative pain management in upper abdominal surgery
Objective(s)
Previous studies have shown that preincisional epidural morphine, bupivacaine, and ketamine combined with epidural anesthesia (EA) and general anesthesia (GA) provided pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery. Recent studies reported that ultralow-dose naloxone enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine in rats. This study investigated the benefits of preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine + ropivacaine + ketamine + naloxone (M + R + K + N) treatment for achieving postoperative pain relief in upper abdominal surgery.
Methods
Eighty American Society of Anesthesiology I–II patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery were allocated to four groups in a randomized, single-blinded study. All patients received combined GA and EA with a continuous epidural infusion of 2% lidocaine (6–8 mL/h) 30 minutes after pain regimen. After GA induction, in Group I, an epidural pain control regimen (total 10 mL) was administered using 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg; M + R); in Group II, 1% lidocaine 8 (mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg; M + R + K); in Group III, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + N); and in Group IV, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + K + N), respectively. All patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with different pain regimens to control subsequent postoperative pain for 3 days following surgery. During the 3-day period following surgery, PCEA consumption (mL), numerical rating scale (NRS) score while cough/moving, and analgesic-related adverse effects were recorded.
Results
Total PCEA consumption for the 3-day observation period was 161.5 ± 17.8 mL, 103.2 ± 21.7 mL, 152.4 ± 25.6 mL, and 74.1 ± 16.9 mL for Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. (p < 0.05). The cough/moving NRS scores were significantly lower in Group IV patients than Groups I and III patients at 4 hours, 12 hours, and on Days 1 and 2 following surgery except for Group II (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R + K + N treatment provides an ideal postoperative pain management than preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R, M + R + K, and M + R + N treatments in upper abdominal surgery.