投资者情绪与审计意见购买

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory Pub Date : 2021-01-22 DOI:10.2308/AJPT-2019-523
Keval Amin, Dan Eshleman, Peng Guo
{"title":"投资者情绪与审计意见购买","authors":"Keval Amin, Dan Eshleman, Peng Guo","doi":"10.2308/AJPT-2019-523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The purpose of this study is to examine whether investor sentiment influences clients' propensity to engage in audit opinion shopping. Using the opinion shopping framework of Lennox (2000), we document that internal control opinion shopping is more prevalent when investor sentiment is high. This effect is concentrated among firms with low institutional ownership. We also find that clients are more likely to undertake downward switches (i.e., Big 4 to non-Big 4 auditor) when sentiment is high. Additional tests reveal that clients who engage in opinion shopping during high sentiment periods have a higher risk of material restatements and higher audit fees. As well, the market-penalty associated with opinion shopping is reduced when sentiment is high. Overall, the results suggest that firms' opinion shopping behavior during high sentiment periods is more prevalent and opportunistic.\n Data Availability: Data are available from public sources cited in the text.","PeriodicalId":48142,"journal":{"name":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investor Sentiment and Audit Opinion Shopping\",\"authors\":\"Keval Amin, Dan Eshleman, Peng Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/AJPT-2019-523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The purpose of this study is to examine whether investor sentiment influences clients' propensity to engage in audit opinion shopping. Using the opinion shopping framework of Lennox (2000), we document that internal control opinion shopping is more prevalent when investor sentiment is high. This effect is concentrated among firms with low institutional ownership. We also find that clients are more likely to undertake downward switches (i.e., Big 4 to non-Big 4 auditor) when sentiment is high. Additional tests reveal that clients who engage in opinion shopping during high sentiment periods have a higher risk of material restatements and higher audit fees. As well, the market-penalty associated with opinion shopping is reduced when sentiment is high. Overall, the results suggest that firms' opinion shopping behavior during high sentiment periods is more prevalent and opportunistic.\\n Data Availability: Data are available from public sources cited in the text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2019-523\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditing-A Journal of Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2019-523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在探讨投资者情绪是否会影响客户购买审计意见的倾向。利用Lennox(2000)的意见购买框架,我们发现当投资者情绪高涨时,内部控制意见购买更为普遍。这种影响主要集中在机构所有权较低的公司。我们还发现,当市场情绪高涨时,客户更有可能进行向下转换(即从四大会计师事务所转向非四大会计师事务所)。额外的测试表明,在情绪高涨时期进行意见购物的客户有更高的重大重述风险和更高的审计费用。此外,当情绪高涨时,与意见购物相关的市场惩罚也会减少。总体而言,结果表明,在情绪高涨时期,企业的意见购买行为更为普遍和机会主义。数据可用性:数据可从文本中引用的公共来源获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investor Sentiment and Audit Opinion Shopping
The purpose of this study is to examine whether investor sentiment influences clients' propensity to engage in audit opinion shopping. Using the opinion shopping framework of Lennox (2000), we document that internal control opinion shopping is more prevalent when investor sentiment is high. This effect is concentrated among firms with low institutional ownership. We also find that clients are more likely to undertake downward switches (i.e., Big 4 to non-Big 4 auditor) when sentiment is high. Additional tests reveal that clients who engage in opinion shopping during high sentiment periods have a higher risk of material restatements and higher audit fees. As well, the market-penalty associated with opinion shopping is reduced when sentiment is high. Overall, the results suggest that firms' opinion shopping behavior during high sentiment periods is more prevalent and opportunistic. Data Availability: Data are available from public sources cited in the text.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AUDITING contains technical articles as well as news and reports on current activities of the association.
期刊最新文献
Attracting the Next Generation of Accountants: The Joint Impact of Sustainability Emphasis and Social Value Orientation on Accounting Career Perceptions Cataloging the Marketplace of Assurance Services Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China The Value of Auditor Verification Amid Economic Uncertainty: International Evidence from Small Businesses Covers and Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1