关系依恋如何中介社会支持-职业后悔关系?

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Global Knowledge Memory and Communication Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1108/gkmc-11-2022-0262
Natashaa Kaul, C. Kumar, Amruta Deshpande, A. Mittal
{"title":"关系依恋如何中介社会支持-职业后悔关系?","authors":"Natashaa Kaul, C. Kumar, Amruta Deshpande, A. Mittal","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-11-2022-0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine if relational attachment could be considered as a mediator in the relationship between social support and career regret. The theoretical framework is based on Kahn’s (2007) work on meaningful connections.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors used a three-part survey for data collection, spread over two months from 368 employees for co-worker social support and 324 employees for supervisor social support working in different sectors in India.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that for co-workers, relational attachment acts as a mediator between instrumental support and career regret; but for personal support, the mediation effect is absent. However, instrumental support is not directly related to career regret. Notably, in case of social support from the supervisor, there does not seem to be any mediation effect for personal or instrumental support. But social support is related to career regret for both categories of support.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe authors contribute to literature that examines the mechanism, driving social support and career regret. By understanding how these factors interact and impact one another, researchers can develop interventions and strategies to help individuals navigate career decisions, improve their personal relationships and increase their access to social support. Ultimately, this research can lead to improved well-being and career satisfaction for individuals. As the sample is generalized, there is scope to examine if the relationships differ based on the work structures and idiosyncrasies of the industries.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study examines the unmapped mechanism that mediates the social support and career regret relationship, and in the process, provides new directions for research.\n","PeriodicalId":43718,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does relational attachment mediate the social support – career regret relation?\",\"authors\":\"Natashaa Kaul, C. Kumar, Amruta Deshpande, A. Mittal\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/gkmc-11-2022-0262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to examine if relational attachment could be considered as a mediator in the relationship between social support and career regret. The theoretical framework is based on Kahn’s (2007) work on meaningful connections.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors used a three-part survey for data collection, spread over two months from 368 employees for co-worker social support and 324 employees for supervisor social support working in different sectors in India.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results indicate that for co-workers, relational attachment acts as a mediator between instrumental support and career regret; but for personal support, the mediation effect is absent. However, instrumental support is not directly related to career regret. Notably, in case of social support from the supervisor, there does not seem to be any mediation effect for personal or instrumental support. But social support is related to career regret for both categories of support.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe authors contribute to literature that examines the mechanism, driving social support and career regret. By understanding how these factors interact and impact one another, researchers can develop interventions and strategies to help individuals navigate career decisions, improve their personal relationships and increase their access to social support. Ultimately, this research can lead to improved well-being and career satisfaction for individuals. As the sample is generalized, there is scope to examine if the relationships differ based on the work structures and idiosyncrasies of the industries.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study examines the unmapped mechanism that mediates the social support and career regret relationship, and in the process, provides new directions for research.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-11-2022-0262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-11-2022-0262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨关系依恋是否在社会支持与职业后悔的关系中起中介作用。理论框架基于Kahn(2007)关于有意义连接的研究。设计/方法/方法作者使用了一项分为三部分的调查来收集数据,分布在两个月内,来自印度不同部门的368名员工的同事社会支持和324名员工的主管社会支持。结果表明:对于同事而言,关系依恋在工具支持与职业后悔之间起中介作用;但对于个人支持,中介效应不存在。然而,工具支持与职业后悔没有直接关系。值得注意的是,在上级社会支持的情况下,个人或工具支持似乎没有任何中介作用。但社会支持与两类支持的职业后悔有关。研究局限/启示:作者为研究社会支持和职业后悔的驱动机制提供了文献。通过了解这些因素如何相互作用和相互影响,研究人员可以制定干预措施和策略,帮助个人进行职业决策,改善他们的个人关系,增加他们获得社会支持的机会。最终,这项研究可以提高个人的幸福感和职业满意度。由于样本是一般化的,因此有可能检查基于行业的工作结构和特性的关系是否不同。原创性/价值本研究探讨了社会支持与职业后悔关系的未映射中介机制,并在此过程中为研究提供了新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How does relational attachment mediate the social support – career regret relation?
Purpose This study aims to examine if relational attachment could be considered as a mediator in the relationship between social support and career regret. The theoretical framework is based on Kahn’s (2007) work on meaningful connections. Design/methodology/approach The authors used a three-part survey for data collection, spread over two months from 368 employees for co-worker social support and 324 employees for supervisor social support working in different sectors in India. Findings The results indicate that for co-workers, relational attachment acts as a mediator between instrumental support and career regret; but for personal support, the mediation effect is absent. However, instrumental support is not directly related to career regret. Notably, in case of social support from the supervisor, there does not seem to be any mediation effect for personal or instrumental support. But social support is related to career regret for both categories of support. Research limitations/implications The authors contribute to literature that examines the mechanism, driving social support and career regret. By understanding how these factors interact and impact one another, researchers can develop interventions and strategies to help individuals navigate career decisions, improve their personal relationships and increase their access to social support. Ultimately, this research can lead to improved well-being and career satisfaction for individuals. As the sample is generalized, there is scope to examine if the relationships differ based on the work structures and idiosyncrasies of the industries. Originality/value This study examines the unmapped mechanism that mediates the social support and career regret relationship, and in the process, provides new directions for research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
期刊最新文献
Mapping covid-19 and transportation: a taxonomical study using bibliometric visualisation The persistence of print books: exploring language preference and format preference among Arabic-speaking library patrons in Jordan A checklist to publish collections as data in GLAM institutions A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones to access library services and resources: challenges and benefits Citation analysis and mapping of genetics research in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1